| Literature DB >> 26664799 |
Brittany E Alexander1, Jasper M de Goeij1,2, Benjamin Mueller2, Mark J A Vermeij2,3, Harm H G van der Geest1.
Abstract
Marine organism are often kept, cultured, and experimented on in running seawater aquaria. However, surprisingly little attention is given to the nutrient composition of the water flowing through these systems, which is generally assumed to equal in situ conditions, but may change due to the presence of biofouling organisms. Significantly lower bacterial abundances and higher inorganic nitrogen species (nitrate, nitrite, and ammonium) were measured in aquarium water when biofouling organisms were present within a 7-year old inlet pipe feeding a tropical reef running seawater aquaria system, compared with aquarium water fed by a new, biofouling-free inlet pipe. These water quality changes are indicative of the feeding activity and waste production of the suspension- and filter-feeding communities found in the old pipe, which included sponges, bivalves, barnacles, and ascidians. To illustrate the physiological consequences of these water quality changes on a model organism kept in the aquaria system, we investigated the influence of the presence and absence of the biofouling community on the functioning of the filter-feeding sponge Halisarca caerulea, by determining its choanocyte (filter cell) proliferation rates. We found a 34% increase in choanocyte proliferation rates following the replacement of the inlet pipe (i.e., removal of the biofouling community). This indicates that the physiological functioning of the sponge was compromised due to suboptimal food conditions within the aquarium resulting from the presence of the biofouling organisms in the inlet pipe. This study has implications for the husbandry and performance of experiments with marine organisms in running seawater aquaria systems. Inlet pipes should be checked regularly, and replaced if necessary, in order to avoid excessive biofouling and to approach in situ water quality.Entities:
Keywords: Bacteria; Biofouling; BrdU; Cell proliferation; Nitrogen; Nutrients; Porifera; Running seawater aquaria; Sponges; Water quality
Year: 2015 PMID: 26664799 PMCID: PMC4675111 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1430
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Biofouling communities within the old inlet pipe.
The first 14 m from the entrance of the inlet pipe are shown. No biofouling communities were found after the initial 12 m. Water samples inside the pipe were taken from areas of the pipe outlined in red and marked by the red arrows (0, 3, 6, and 12 m).
Figure 2Bacterial abundance along the old (black circles) and new (grey circles) inlet pipes leading to the flow-through aquarium (open squares).
Solid lines indicate exponential models for bacterial abundance within the first 60 m of inlet pipe (i.e., the section that was replaced). The dotted lines represent differences in bacterial abundance between the flow-through aquarium, which was 100 m from the inlet pipe entrance, and the replaced section of the inlet pipe.
Figure 3(A) Nitrate [NO], (B) nitrite [NO], (C) ammonium [NH], and (D) phosphate [PO] concentrations along the length of the old (black circles) and new pipes (grey circles), and in the aquarium (open squares).
Solid lines indicate linear models for inorganic nutrient concentrations within the first 60 m of inlet pipe (the section that was replaced), which was 100 m from the entrance of the inlet pipe. The dotted lines represent differences in inorganic nutrient concentrations between the flow-through aquarium and the replaced section of the inlet pipe.
Water quality parameters (bacterial abundance [BA], nitrate (NO), nitrite [NO], ammonium [NH], and phosphate [PO]) and H. caerulea choanocyte proliferation rates in a flow-through aquarium fed with water from the old (+ biofouling) and new inlet pipe (− biofouling).
Means ± SD are shown (n = 3). Percentage increases or decreases in the aforementioned parameters between the old and the new pipe are given. NA, not applicable; i.e., no significant difference.
| Water quality parameters | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BA (×105 mL−1) | NO | NO | NH | PO | |
| Aquarium water + biofouling | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 0.86 ± 0.04 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 2.42 ± 1.73 | 0.04 ± 0.01 |
| Aquarium water − biofouling | 5.9 ± 0.0 | 0.50 ± 0.05 | 0.05 ± 0.00 | 0.57 ± 0.13 | 0.05 ± 0.01 |
| % increase or decrease from old pipe to new pipe | 217 | −42 | −42 | −77 | NA |