| Literature DB >> 26664682 |
David E V Harter1, Mike Thiv2, Alfons Weig3, Anke Jentsch4, Carl Beierkuhnlein1.
Abstract
The Crassulacean genus Aeonium is a well-known example for plant species radiation on oceanic archipelagos. However, while allopatric speciation among islands is documented for this genus, the role of intra-island speciation due to population divergence by topographical isolation or ecological heterogeneity has not yet been addressed. The aim of this study was to investigate intraspecific genetic structures and to identify spatial and ecological drivers of genetic population differentiation on the island scale. We analyzed inter simple sequence repeat variation within two island-endemic Aeonium species of La Palma: one widespread generalist that covers a large variety of different habitat types (Ae. davidbramwellii) and one narrow ecological specialist (Ae. nobile), in order to assess evolutionary potentials on this island. Gene pool differentiation and genetic diversity patterns were associated with major landscape structures in both species, with phylogeographic implications. However, overall levels of genetic differentiation were low. For the generalist species, outlier loci detection and loci-environment correlation approaches indicated moderate signatures of divergent selection pressures linked to temperature and precipitation variables, while the specialist species missed such patterns. Our data point to incipient differentiation among populations, emphasizing that ecological heterogeneity and topographical structuring within the small scales of an island can foster evolutionary processes. Very likely, such processes have contributed to the radiation of Aeonium on the Canary Islands. There is also support for different evolutionary mechanisms between generalist and specialist species.Entities:
Keywords: Gene flow barriers; island biogeography; isolation by distance; isolation by ecology; landscape genetics; niche width
Year: 2015 PMID: 26664682 PMCID: PMC4667834 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1682
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1The two study species Aeonium davidbramwellii (A) and Aeonium nobile (B). Photographs by Carl Beierkuhnlein and Katharina Staab, respectively.
Figure 2Genetic clustering results for Aeonium davidbramwellii. (A) structure results for K = 2–4. Vertical bars depict color‐coded proportions of genetic cluster assignments for single individuals with populations being separated by vertical black lines. (B) Map of La Palma showing the occurrences of the species (green points) and the genetic structuring from the structure results for K = 3 as pie charts per analyzed population. (C) Discriminant analysis of principal components ordination plot with each point representing one individual, distributed along the two first linear Discriminants. Individuals of the same population are connected to its centroid and share the same coloring. Five principal components were retained (representing 31.6% of the total variation) to obtain adequate discrimination of clusters, based on cross‐validation. Populations are named by their clockwise position around the island, starting from the north.
Figure 3Potential adaptive genetic differentiation among populations of Aeonium davidbramwellii of locus UBC809_292 in relation to mean annual temperature (A) and of locus UBT4_333 in relation to mean precipitation from May to October (B) on La Palma. Black, white, and gray dots indicate the presence or absence of the respective Inter‐Simple Sequence Repeat fragment in an individual or missing data, respectively. Local Moran's I values >0.1 indicate local spatial autocorrelation of allelic variation. Single individual coordinates were dispersed around their population center for mapping purposes.
Descriptive population genetic parameters for the analyzed populations of Aeonium davidbramwellii
| Population | Longitude UTM | Latitude UTM | Elevation (m a.s.l.) |
| No. of bands | No. of private alleles |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A_d | 218814 | 3192964 | 80 | 5 | 89 | 6 | 5.985 | 0.746 | 38.4 | 0.137 |
| B_d | 229864 | 3187626 | 134 | 4 | 51 | 0 | 2.661 | 0.435 | 22 | 0.075 |
| C_d | 225423 | 3179899 | 870 | 5 | 88 | 1 | 4.878 | 0.737 | 37.9 | 0.134 |
| D_d | 230166 | 3168798 | 85 | 5 | 58 | 0 | 2.750 | 0.474 | 25 | 0.087 |
| E_d | 222168 | 3152717 | 235 | 5 | 68 | 1 | 3.209 | 0.582 | 29.3 | 0.083 |
| F_d | 219540 | 3168200 | 893 | 5 | 66 | 0 | 3.014 | 0.565 | 28.4 | 0.098 |
| G_d | 213600 | 3174629 | 115 | 5 | 61 | 2 | 2.881 | 0.504 | 26.3 | 0.091 |
| H_d | 217192 | 3178367 | 365 | 5 | 106 | 7 | 7.181 | 0.905 | 45.7 | 0.165 |
| I_d | 216611 | 3179654 | 1051 | 5 | 77 | 2 | 4.166 | 0.642 | 33.2 | 0.104 |
| J_d | 216095 | 3180765 | 1922 | 5 | 124 | 0 | 7.543 | 1.047 | 53.4 | 0.185 |
| K_d | 208142 | 3182987 | 271 | 5 | 54 | 1 | 2.664 | 0.444 | 23.3 | 0.082 |
N, Number of scored individuals; DW, rarity index; A, allelic diversity; PLP, percentage of polymorphic loci; H e, Nei's gene diversity.
Combined results of outlier loci detection methods for Aeonium davidbramwellii. Locus names and overall frequencies of dominant fragments are depicted in the first (left) panel. The second panel depicts results of the F ST‐based methods (only indications for divergent selection shown): bayescan (posterior probabilities, PP) and mcheza (F ST‐ and P‐values). The third and fourth panels show results of the two correlative methods: LFMM (for K = 1) and sam, respectively. Outlier loci candidates are highlighted by coloring in the respective columns/panels. Significance of correlations between allelic variation and environmental variables by LFMM and sam is color‐coded as follows: yellow: P < 0.05, orange: P < 0.01, red: P < 0.005, dark red: P < 0.001
Figure 4Genetic clustering results for Aeonium nobile. (A) structure results for K = 2–4. Vertical bars depict color‐coded proportions of genetic cluster assignments for single individuals with populations being separated by vertical black lines. (B) Map of La Palma showing the occurrences of the species (brown points) and the genetic structuring from the structure results for K = 3 as pie charts per analyzed population. (C) Discriminant analysis of principal components ordination plot with each point representing one individual, distributed along the two first linear discriminants. Individuals of the same population are connected to its centroid and share the same coloring. Ten principal components were retained (representing 37.7% of the total variation) to obtain adequate discrimination of clusters, based on cross‐validation. Populations are named by their latitudinal position, starting from the north.
Descriptive population genetic parameters for the analyzed populations of Aeonium nobile
| Population | Longitude UTM | Latitude UTM | Elevation (m a.s.l.) | N | No. of bands | No. of private alleles |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A_n | 207834 | 3182960 | 36 | 4 | 50 | 2 | 3.125 | 0.500 | 25.5 | 0.100 |
| B_n | 209258 | 3180361 | 293 | 4 | 37 | 1 | 2.573 | 0.378 | 18.9 | 0.069 |
| C_n | 210473 | 3179117 | 443 | 5 | 79 | 2 | 5.202 | 0.791 | 40.3 | 0.143 |
| D_n | 210327 | 3178565 | 149 | 3 | 18 | 1 | 1.882 | 0.179 | 9.2 | 0.045 |
| E_n | 217096 | 3178041 | 363 | 5 | 96 | 0 | 6.306 | 0.954 | 49 | 0.162 |
| F_n | 213028 | 3175880 | 720 | 4 | 55 | 1 | 3.840 | 0.546 | 28.1 | 0.109 |
| G_n | 213600 | 3174629 | 115 | 5 | 80 | 0 | 4.442 | 0.806 | 40.8 | 0.123 |
| H_n | 212226 | 3172861 | 6 | 5 | 103 | 5 | 6.871 | 1.041 | 52.6 | 0.160 |
| I_n | 219344 | 3157172 | 275 | 4 | 55 | 1 | 3.965 | 0.556 | 28.1 | 0.099 |
| J_n | 220699 | 3153422 | 415 | 5 | 60 | 3 | 4.448 | 0.592 | 30.6 | 0.108 |
N, Number of scored individuals; DW, rarity index; A, allelic diversity; PLP, percentage of polymorphic loci; H e, Nei's gene diversity.