Literature DB >> 26664282

Multi-Axis Prosthetic Knee Resembles Alpine Skiing Movements of an Intact Leg.

Ivan Demšar1, Jože Duhovnik1, Blaž Lešnik2, Matej Supej3.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to analyse the flexion angles of the ski boot, ankle and knee joints of an above-knee prosthesis and to compare them with an intact leg and a control group of skiers. One subject with an above-knee amputation of the right leg and eight healthy subjects simulated the movement of a skiing turn by performing two-leg squats in laboratory conditions. By adding additional loads in proportion to body weight (BW; +1/3 BW, +2/3 BW, +3/3 BW), various skiing regimes were simulated. Change of Flexion Angle (CoFA) and Range of Motion (RoM) in the ski boot, ankle and knee joints were calculated and compared. An average RoM in the skiing boot on the side of prosthesis (4.4 ± 1.1°) was significantly lower compared to an intact leg (5.9 ± 1.8°) and the control group (6.5 ± 2.3°). In the ankle joint, the average RoM was determined to be 13.2±2.9° in the prosthesis, 12.7 ± 2.8° in an intact leg and 14.8±3.6 in the control group. However, the RoM of the knee joint in the prosthesis (42.2 ± 4.2°) was significantly larger than that of the intact leg (34.7 ± 4.4°). The average RoM of the knee joint in the control group was 47.8 ± 5.4°. The influences of additional loads on the kinematics of the lower extremities were different on the side of the prosthesis and on the intact leg. In contrast, additional loads did not produce any significant differences in the control group. Although different CoFAs in the ski boot, ankle and knee joints were used, an above-knee prosthesis with a built-in multi-axis prosthetic knee enables comparable leg kinematics in simulated alpine skiing. Key pointsThe RoM in the ski boot on the side of the prosthetic leg was smaller than the RoM of the intact leg and the control group of healthy subjects.The RoM in the ankle joint of prosthetic leg was comparable to that of the intact leg and the control group of healthy subjects.The RoM in the prosthetic knee joint was greater than the RoM in the knee joint of the intact leg and smaller than that of the control group.The total knee flexions in the laboratory measurements were comparable with field measurements.Additional load affects the RoM of the ski boot, ankle and knee joints for the amputated skier in both legs. No significant influence from the additional load was found on the RoM in the control group of healthy subjects.The above-knee prosthesis with a multiple-axis prosthetic knee reproduces the alpine skiing kinematics of an intact leg.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Above-knee amputation; Alpine skiing; impairment; kinematics; prosthesis

Year:  2015        PMID: 26664282      PMCID: PMC4657428     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  10 in total

1.  The biomechanics of running.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 2.  Biomechanical aspects of new techniques in alpine skiing and ski-jumping.

Authors:  Erich Müller; Hermann Schwameder
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.337

3.  A new time measurement method using a high-end global navigation satellite system to analyze alpine skiing.

Authors:  Matej Supej; Hans-Christer Holmberg
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Three-dimensional knee joint loading in alpine skiing: a comparison between a carved and a skidded turn.

Authors:  Miriam Klous; Erich Müller; Hermann Schwameder
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 1.833

5.  Comparative evaluation of two skiing simulators as functional training devices for recreational skiers.

Authors:  Fausto A Panizzolo; Giuseppe Marcolin; Nicola Petrone
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Quadriceps Muscle Function during Recreational Alpine Skiing.

Authors:  Josef Kröll; James M Wakeling; John G Seifert; Erich Müller
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 7.  The biomechanics of walking and running.

Authors:  S Ounpuu
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.182

8.  Kinematic and kinetic comparisons of transfemoral amputee gait using C-Leg and Mauch SNS prosthetic knees.

Authors:  Ava D Segal; Michael S Orendurff; Glenn K Klute; Martin L McDowell; Janice A Pecoraro; Jane Shofer; Joseph M Czerniecki
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec

9.  Effect of ski boot settings on tibio-femoral abduction and rotation during standing and simulated skiing.

Authors:  Harald Böhm; Veit Senner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Prosthetic gait of unilateral transfemoral amputees: a kinematic study.

Authors:  S M Jaegers; J H Arendzen; H J de Jongh
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.966

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.