| Literature DB >> 26664250 |
Sherif F Elmekkawi1, Ghada M Mansour1, Mohammed S E Elsafty1, Alaa S Hassanin1, Mohamed Laban1, Heba M Elsayed2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the accuracy of prenatal assessment of interventricular septum (IVS) thickness, right myocardial wall thickness (RMWT), and left myocardial wall thickness (LMWT) by two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound for the prediction of perinatal mortality and postnatal diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) among diabetic pregnant women. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 diabetic pregnant women at 35 weeks or more were enrolled in this study from January 1, 2012, to June 30, 2014, at Ain Shams Maternity Hospital, Cairo, Egypt. The 2D ultrasound was done once for all the participants at the time of recruitment; IVS thickness, RMWT, and LMWT were measured. The glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of the participants were recorded. Neonatal assessment including postnatal echocardiography was done after 48 hours. Postnatal results were compared with the prenatal predictive results.Entities:
Keywords: diabetes mellitus (DM) with pregnancy; echocardiography; hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM); infant of diabetic mother; interventricular septum (IVS) thickness; left myocardial wall thickness (LMWT); two-dimensional ultrasound
Year: 2015 PMID: 26664250 PMCID: PMC4667560 DOI: 10.4137/CMWH.S32825
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Med Insights Womens Health ISSN: 1179-562X
Comparison between good and poor glycemic control on prenatal and postnatal ultrasound measurements.
| GLYCEMIC CONTROL (110) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOD (78) | POOR (32) | ||
| by prenatal ultrasound | 3.78 ± 0.78 | 5.09 ± 0.96 | <0.0001 |
| by postnatal ultrasound | 3.81 ± 0.78 | 5.20 ± 0.93 | <0.0001 |
| by prenatal ultrasound | 4.36 ± 0.58 | 5.25 ± 0.76 | <0.0001 |
| by postnatal ultrasound | 4.38 ± 0.59 | 5.25 ± 0.76 | <0.0001 |
| by prenatal ultrasound | 4.97 ± 0.62 | 5.66 ± 0.75 | <0.0001 |
| by postnatal ultrasound | 5.01 ± 0.63 | 5.78 ± 0.81 | <0.0001 |
| by postnatal echocardiography | 61.79 ± 3.17 | 57.50 ± 4.02 | <0.0001 |
Comparison between prenatal and postnatal assessments of the IVS thickness, RMWT, and LMWT.
| PRENATAL | POSTNATAL | MPD ± SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVS thickness (mm) | 4.16 ± 1.02 | 4.21 ± 1.03 | 0.04 ± 0.18 | 0.004 |
| Right myocardial thickness (mm) | 4.73 ± 0.84 | 4.63 ± 0.76 | 0.08 ± 0.21 | 0.002 |
| Left myocardial thickness (mm) | 5.30 ± 8.06 | 5.23 ± 0.77 | 0.09 ± 0.19 | 0.001 |
Notes: Data are presented as mean ± SD. *Analysis is done using paired student’s t-test.
Abbreviations: IVS, interventricular septum; MPD, mean paired difference; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 1ROC curves for estimating the association between prenatal IVS thickness, right and left myocardial thicknesses, and postnatal diagnosis of HCM.
Notes: All of those measurements showed significant predictability of HCM, with the prenatal IVS thickness being the most predictable, having the largest area under the curve (AUC). A prenatal IVS thickness ≥4.5 mm was associated with a postnatal diagnosis of HCM at a sensitivity of 82%, a specificity of 68%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 37%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94%, a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 2.6, and an overall accuracy of 72%. AUC for prenatal IVS thickness: 0.80, 95% CI (0.66 to 0.93), p < 0.001. AUC for prenatal right myocardial thickness: 0.70, 95% CI (0.57 to 0.84), p = 0.003. AUC for prenatal left myocardial thickness: 0.68, 95% CI (0.53 to 0.82), p = 0.01. AUC, 95% CI: area under the curve and its 95% confidence interval.
Figure 2ROC curve for estimating the association between prenatal IVS thickness-to-left myocardial thickness (IVS:LMWT) ratio, and postnatal diagnosis of HCM.
Notes: A prenatal IVS: LMWT ratio ≤1.18 was associated with a postnatal diagnosis of HCM at a sensitivity of 82%, a specificity of 72%, a PPV of 40%, a NPV of 95%, a LR+ of 3, and an overall accuracy of 74%. AUC: 0.75, 95% CI (0.63 to 0.87), p = 0.003. AUC, 95% CI: area under the curve and its 95% confidence interval.
Multivariate regression analysis for association between prenatal IVS thickness and IVS/LMWT ratio and postnatal diagnosis of HCM.
| UNADJUSTED OR (95% CI) | ADJUSTED OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Prenatal IVS thickness ≥4.5 mm | 9.73 (4.04 to 31.15) | 3.02 (1.1 to 11.65) |
| Prenatal IVS:LMWT ratio ≤1.18 | 11.83 (3.67 to 38.15) | 3.78 (1.2 to 14.80) |
Abbreviations: IVS, interventricular septum; LMWT, left myocardial wall thickness; OR (95% CI), odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval.
Figure 3Fetal interventricular septal thickness 6 mm in a case of uncontrolled pregestational diabetes mellitus with pregnancy by 2D ultrasound.
Association between prenatal IVS thickness and IVS/LMWT ratio, and IUFD and relevant perinatal mortality.
| IUFD (n = 10) RR (95% CI) | POSSIBLY RELEVANT PERINATAL MORTALITY | |
|---|---|---|
| Prenatal IVS thickness ≥4.5 mm | 2.15 (1.45 to 3.18) | 2.63 (2.07 to 3.35) |
| Prenatal IVS:LMWT ratio ≤1.18 | 1.88 (1.17 to 3.01) | 2.63 (2.07 to 3.35) |
Notes:
Possibly relevant perinatal mortality includes both the cases of IUFD and neonatal death due to heart failure.
Abbreviations: IVS, interventricular septum; LMWT, left myocardial wall thickness; IUFD, intrauterine fetal demise; RR (95% CI), relative risk and its 95% confidence interval.