Literature DB >> 26663507

Predicting heart failure decompensation using cardiac implantable electronic devices: a review of practices and challenges.

Nathaniel M Hawkins1, Sean A Virani1, Matthew Sperrin2, Iain E Buchan2, John J V McMurray3, Andrew D Krahn1.   

Abstract

Cardiac implantable electronic devices include remote monitoring tools intended to guide heart failure management. The monitoring focus has been on averting hospitalizations by predicting worsening heart failure. However, although device measurements including intrathoracic impedance correlate with risk of decompensation, they individually predict hospitalizations with limited accuracy. Current 'crisis detection' methods involve repeatedly screening for impending decompensation, and do not adhere to the principles of diagnostic testing. Complex substrate, limited test performance, low outcome incidence, and long test to outcome times inevitably generate low positive and high negative predictive values. When combined with spectrum bias, the generalizability, incremental value, and cost-effectiveness of device algorithms are questionable. To avoid these pitfalls, remote monitoring may need to shift from crisis detection to health maintenance, keeping the patient within an ideal physiological range through continuous 'closed loop' interaction and dynamic therapy adjustment. Test performance must also improve, possibly through combination with physiological sensors in different dimensions, static baseline characteristics, and biomarkers. Complex modelling may tailor monitoring to individual phenotypes, and thus realize a personalized medicine approach. Future randomized controlled trials should carefully consider these issues, and ensure that the interventions tested are generalizable to clinical practice.
© 2015 The Authors European Journal of Heart Failure © 2015 European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure; Remote monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26663507     DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail        ISSN: 1388-9842            Impact factor:   15.534


  14 in total

1.  Editorial Commentary: Hard questions for mobile technology in cardiology.

Authors:  Daniel B Kramer; Robert W Yeh; Peter J Zimetbaum
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.677

2.  Cost-Effectiveness of Remote Cardiac Monitoring With the CardioMEMS Heart Failure System.

Authors:  Jordana K Schmier; Kevin L Ong; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 3.  Remote Patient Monitoring in Heart Failure: Factors for Clinical Efficacy.

Authors:  Ankit Bhatia; Thomas M Maddox
Journal:  Int J Heart Fail       Date:  2020-11-30

4.  Hemodynamic monitoring by intracardiac impedance measured by cardiac resynchronization defibrillators: Evaluation in a controlled clinical setting (BIO.Detect HF II study).

Authors:  Peter-Paul Henri Marie Delnoy; Klaus-Jürgen Gutleben; Niels Eske Bruun; Sebastian K G Maier; Hanno Oswald; Christoph Stellbrink; Jens Brock Johansen; Stefan Paule; Peter Søgaard
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 5.  Mildly symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations.

Authors:  Alexandra Arvanitaki; Eleni Michou; Andreas Kalogeropoulos; Haralambos Karvounis; George Giannakoulas
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-05-05

Review 6.  Remote monitoring: Doomed to let down or an attractive promise?

Authors:  Fabiana Lucà; Laura Cipolletta; Stefania Angela Di Fusco; Annamaria Iorio; Andrea Pozzi; Carmelo Massimiliano Rao; Nadia Ingianni; Manuela Benvenuto; Andrea Madeo; Damiana Fiscella; Daniela Benedetto; Giuseppina Maura Francese; Sandro Gelsomino; Massimo Zecchin; Domenico Gabrielli; Michele Massimo Gulizia
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2019-05-30

7.  Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and resynchronization devices to improve patient outcomes: dead end or way ahead?

Authors:  Frieder Braunschweig; Stefan D Anker; Jochen Proff; Niraj Varma
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 5.214

8.  Implant-based multi-parameter telemonitoring of patients with heart failure and a defibrillator with vs. without cardiac resynchronization therapy option: a subanalysis of the IN-TIME trial.

Authors:  Johann Christoph Geller; Thorsten Lewalter; Niels Eske Bruun; Milos Taborsky; Frank Bode; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Christoph Stellbrink; Steffen Schön; Holger Mühling; Hanno Oswald; Sebastian Reif; Stefan Kääb; Peter Illes; Jochen Proff; Nikolaos Dagres; Gerhard Hindricks
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  Improving the monitoring of chronic heart failure in Argentina: is the implantable pulmonary artery pressure with CardioMEMS Heart Failure System cost-effective?

Authors:  Andrea Alcaraz; Carlos Rojas-Roque; Daniela Prina; Juan Martín González; Andrés Pichon-Riviere; Federico Augustovski; Alfredo Palacios
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2021-07-09

10.  Prospective evaluation of integrated device diagnostics for heart failure management: results of the TRIAGE-HF study.

Authors:  Sean A Virani; Vinod Sharma; Mary McCann; Jodi Koehler; Bernice Tsang; Shelley Zieroth
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2018-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.