Literature DB >> 26662882

Assessment of non-surgical versus surgical therapy for localized hepatocellular carcinoma.

Sanjay Mohanty1,2,3, Ravi Rajaram1,2,3, Karl Y Bilimoria1,2,3, Riad Salem4, Timothy M Pawlik5, David J Bentrem2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with adequate liver function is typically treated with resection. Non-surgical modalities including trans-arterial embolization have emerged as options for intermediate/advanced HCC. Hypothesizing that non-surgical techniques have expanded to localized disease, we examined treatment patterns, factors associated with surgical therapy, and the impact of modality on survival.
METHODS: Non-cirrhotic, localized HCC patients were identified from the National Cancer Data Base (2003-2011). Trends were examined using average annual percent change (AAPC). Regression models were developed to determine factors associated with treatment and assess the association of modality with survival.
RESULTS: Of 10,187 patients (median tumor size: 3.7 cm), 6,387 (62.7%) underwent surgery and 3,800 (37.3%) non-surgical therapy. Surgery declined from 61.6% to 44.5% (AAPC, -3.7%; 95%CI, -4.9% to -2.6%, P < 0.001). Non-surgical therapies increased from 17.2% to 39.2% (AAPC 11.4%; 95%CI, 8.8-14.1%, P < 0.001). White race, higher income, and treatment in an academic center (OR = 1.37, 95%CI 1.13-1.66) were associated with surgery. Patients selected for non-surgical therapy had worse adjusted 5-year survival (HR=2.05, 95%CI 1.85-2.26).
CONCLUSIONS: Non-surgical therapy has become as common as surgery in the treatment of non-cirrhotic, localized HCC. Randomized studies are needed to compare the effectiveness of treatments for this disease.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hepatocellular carcinoma; therapy; treatment trends

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26662882     DOI: 10.1002/jso.24113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  4 in total

1.  Minimally Invasive Liver Resection for Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Inconsistent Outcomes from Matched or Weighted Cohorts.

Authors:  Lu Wu; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Katiuscha Merath; J Madison Hyer; Anghela Z Paredes; Rittal Mehta; Kota Sahara; Fabio Bagante; Eliza W Beal; Feng Shen; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Caveat Emptor: 2-Year Follow-Up Evaluating Post-Resection Liver Decompensation in Patients with Underlying Cirrhosis and Incident Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Dhavan Shah; Bona Ko; David J Bentrem
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Competing risk analysis on outcome after hepatic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients.

Authors:  Alessandro Cucchetti; Carlo Sposito; Antonio Daniele Pinna; Davide Citterio; Matteo Cescon; Marco Bongini; Giorgio Ercolani; Christian Cotsoglou; Lorenzo Maroni; Vincenzo Mazzaferro
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Stimulus-responsive self-assembled prodrugs in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Xiao Dong; Rajeev K Brahma; Chao Fang; Shao Q Yao
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 9.825

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.