Literature DB >> 26661617

Transport of Iodine Is Different in Cartilage and Meniscus.

J T J Honkanen1,2, M J Turunen3, V Tiitu4, J S Jurvelin3,5, J Töyräs3,5.   

Abstract

Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) has been proposed for diagnostics of cartilage and meniscus injuries and degeneration. As both tissues may be imaged simultaneously, CECT could provide a method for comprehensive evaluation of knee joint health. Since the composition and structure of cartilage and meniscus are different, we hypothesize that transport characteristics of anionic contrast agents also differ between the tissues. This would affect interpretation of CECT images and warrants investigation. To clarify this, we aimed to determine the transport kinematics of anionic iodine (q = -1, M = 126.9 g/mol), assumed to not be significantly affected by the steric hindrance, thus providing faster transport than large molecule contrast agents (e.g., ioxaglate). Cylindrical samples (d = 6 mm, h = 2 mm) were prepared from healthy bovine (n = 10) patella and meniscus, immersed in isotonic phosphate-buffered NaI solution (20 mgI/mL), and subsequently imaged with a micro-CT at 20 time points up to 23 h. Subsequently, normalized attenuation and contrast agent flux, as well as water, collagen, and proteoglycan (PG) contents in the tissues were determined. Normalized attenuation at equilibrium was higher (p = 0.005) in meniscus. Contrast agent flux was lower (p = 0.005) in the meniscus at 10 min, but higher (p < 0.05) between 30 and 120 min. In both tissues, contrast agent distribution at equilibrium suggested an inverse agreement with the depth-wise PG distribution. In conclusion, iodine transport into cartilage and meniscus was different, especially between the first 2 hours after the immersion. This is an important finding which should be considered during simultaneous CECT of cartilage and meniscus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Contrast agent; Transport kinematics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26661617     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-015-1513-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  5 in total

1.  dGEMRIC and CECT Comparison of Cationic and Anionic Contrast Agents in Cadaveric Human Metacarpal Cartilage.

Authors:  Jonathan D Freedman; Daniel J Ellis; Hrvoje Lusic; Gopal Varma; Aaron K Grant; Benjamin A Lakin; Brian D Snyder; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  EFFECTS OF SOLUTE SIZE AND TISSUE COMPOSITION ON MOLECULAR AND MACROMOLECULAR DIFFUSIVITY IN HUMAN KNEE CARTILAGE.

Authors:  Francesco Travascio; Sabrina Valladares-Prieto; Alicia R Jackson
Journal:  Osteoarthr Cartil Open       Date:  2020-07-24

Review 3.  Three-Dimensional Printing Strategies for Irregularly Shaped Cartilage Tissue Engineering: Current State and Challenges.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Zhonghan Wang; He Liu; Jiaqi Liu; Ronghang Li; Xiujie Zhu; Ming Ren; Mingli Wang; Yuzhe Liu; Youbin Li; Yuxi Jia; Chenyu Wang; Jincheng Wang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-05

4.  Optical Coherence Elastography as a Tool for Studying Deformations in Biomaterials: Spatially-Resolved Osmotic Strain Dynamics in Cartilaginous Samples.

Authors:  Yulia Alexandrovskaya; Olga Baum; Alexander Sovetsky; Alexander Matveyev; Lev Matveev; Emil Sobol; Vladimir Zaitsev
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Cationic Contrast Agent Diffusion Differs Between Cartilage and Meniscus.

Authors:  Juuso T J Honkanen; Mikael J Turunen; Jonathan D Freedman; Simo Saarakkala; Mark W Grinstaff; Janne H Ylärinne; Jukka S Jurvelin; Juha Töyräs
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.934

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.