Literature DB >> 26660862

Anterolateral Drawer Versus Anterior Drawer Test for Ankle Instability: A Biomechanical Model.

Adam G Miller1, Stuart H Myers1, Brent G Parks1, Gregory P Guyton2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The addition of unconstrained internal rotation to the physical examination could allow for detection of more subtle degrees of ankle instability. We hypothesized that a simulated anterolateral drawer test allowing unconstrained internal rotation of the ankle would provoke greater displacement of the lateral talus in the mortise versus the anterior drawer test.
METHODS: Ten cadaveric lower extremities were tested in a custom apparatus designed to reproduce the anterior drawer test and the anterolateral drawer test, in which the ankle was allowed to internally rotate about the intact deep deltoid ligament while being subluxed anteriorly. Specimens were tested intact and with anterior tibiofibular ligament sectioned. A differential variable reluctance transducer was used to measure lateral talar displacement with anterior forces of 25 and 50 N.
RESULTS: No significant differences in talar displacement or ankle rotation were noted in intact specimens between the groups. Among sectioned specimens, significantly more talar displacement (25 N [6.5 ± 1.7 mm vs 3.8 ± 2.4 mm] and 50 N [8.7 ± 0.9 mm vs 4.5 ± 2.5 mm], P < .001) and ankle rotation (25 N [13.9 ± 8.0 degrees vs 0.0 ± 0.0 degrees] and 50 N [23.7 ± 5.8 degrees vs 0.0 ± 0.0 degrees], P < .001) were found in the anterolateral drawer versus anterior drawer group.
CONCLUSION: In an ankle instability model, the anterolateral drawer test provoked almost twice the lateral talus displacement found with the anterior drawer test. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Allowing internal rotation of the ankle while testing for ankle instability may allow the examiner to detect more subtle degrees of ankle instability.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle; anterior drawer; anterolateral drawer; biomechanics; instability

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26660862     DOI: 10.1177/1071100715620854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  6 in total

1.  Reverse anterolateral drawer test is more sensitive and accurate for diagnosing chronic anterior talofibular ligament injury.

Authors:  Qianru Li; Yingchun Tu; Jun Chen; Jieling Shan; Patrick Shu-Hang Yung; Samuel Ka-Kin Ling; Yinghui Hua
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  CORR Insights®: Do External Supports Improve Dynamic Balance in Patients with Chronic Ankle Instability? A Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gregory P Guyton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  An Updated Model of Chronic Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Jay Hertel; Revay O Corbett
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  Evaluating and Differentiating Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Phillip A Gribble
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Biomechanics of Ankle Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study to Compare Stability of Reconstruction Techniques Using 1 or 2 Fibular Tunnels.

Authors:  Martina Gautschi; Elias Bachmann; Camila Shirota; Tobias Götschi; Niklas Renner; Stephan H Wirth
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-10-22

6.  Ultrasound-Guided Anterior Talofibular Ligament Repair With Augmentation Can Restore Ankle Kinematics: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Soichi Hattori; Kentaro Onishi; Calvin K Chan; Satoshi Yamakawa; Yuji Yano; Philipp W Winkler; MaCalus V Hogan; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-08-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.