Literature DB >> 26660516

Chondrocyte survival in osteochondral transplant cylinders depends on the harvesting technique.

Benedikt Hafke1, Maximilian Petri1, Eduardo Suero1, Claudia Neunaber1, Sebastian Kwisda1, Christian Krettek1, Michael Jagodzinski1, Mohamed Omar2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In autologous osteochondral transplantation, the edges of the harvested plug are particularly susceptible to mechanical or thermal damage to the chondrocytes. We hypothesised that the applied harvesting device has an impact on chondrocyte vitality.
METHODS: Both knees of five blackhead sheep (ten knees) underwent open osteochondral plug harvesting with three different circular harvesting devices (osteoarticular transfer system harvester [OATS; diameter 8 mm; Arthrex, Munich, Germany], diamond cutter [DC; diameter 8.35 mm; Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany] and hollow reamer with cutting crown [HRCC; diameter 7 mm; Dannoritzer, Tuttlingen, Germany]) from distinctly assigned anatomical sites of the knee joint. The rotary cutters (DC and HRCC) were either used with (+) or without cooling (-). Surgical cuts of the cartilage with a scalpel blade were chosen as control method. After cryotomy cutting, chondrocyte vitality was assessed using fluorescence microscopy and a Live/Dead assay.
RESULTS: There were distinct patterns of chondrocyte vitality, with reproducible accumulations of dead chondrocytes along the harvesting edge. No statistical difference in chondrocyte survivorship was seen between the OATS technique and the control method, or between the HRCC+ technique and the control method (P > 0.05). The DC+, HRCC- and DC- techniques yielded significantly lower chondrocyte survival rates compared with the control method (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Chondrocyte survival in osteochondral cylinders depends on the applied harvesting technique. The use of rotary cutters without cooling yielded worst results, while the traditional OATS punch and rotary cutters with cooling achieved comparable rates of chondrocyte vitality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chondrocyte harvesting; Chondrocyte survival; Diamond cutter; Hollow reamer; OATS harvester; Osteochondral transplant

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26660516     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-3065-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  20 in total

1.  Regenerative treatment in osteochondral lesions of the talus: autologous chondrocyte implantation versus one-step bone marrow derived cells transplantation.

Authors:  Roberto Buda; Francesca Vannini; Francesco Castagnini; Marco Cavallo; Alberto Ruffilli; Laura Ramponi; Gherardo Pagliazzi; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Osteochondral transplantation in the elbow leads to good clinical and radiologic long-term results: an 8- to 14-year follow-up examination.

Authors:  Stephan Vogt; Sebastian Siebenlist; Daniel Hensler; Lizzy Weigelt; Patrick Ansah; Klaus Woertler; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Chondrocyte repopulation of the zone of death induced by osteochondral harvest.

Authors:  A J McGregor; B G Amsden; S D Waldman
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Chondrocyte death associated with human femoral osteochondral harvest as performed for mosaicplasty.

Authors:  J S Huntley; P G Bush; J M McBirnie; A H Simpson; A C Hall
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Treatment of osteochondral lesions in the elbow: results after autologous osteochondral transplantation.

Authors:  L Weigelt; S Siebenlist; D Hensler; A B Imhoff; S Vogt
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Manual punch versus power harvesting of osteochondral grafts.

Authors:  Peter J Evans; Anthony Miniaci; Mark B Hurtig
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Long-term results of autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee for chronic chondral and osteochondral defects.

Authors:  Leela C Biant; George Bentley; Sridhar Vijayan; John A Skinner; Richard W J Carrington
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Evaluation of subsidence, chondrocyte survival and graft incorporation following autologous osteochondral transplantation.

Authors:  Niels B Kock; Gerjon Hannink; Albert van Kampen; Nico Verdonschot; Job L C van Susante; Pieter Buma
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Reconstruction of osteochondral defects by combined bone grafting and a bilayer collagen membrane as a sandwich technique.

Authors:  Maximilian Petri; Max Ettinger; Christian von Falck; Nael Hawi; Michael Jagodzinski; Carl Haasper
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2013-11-18

10.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head using autologous osteochondral transfer (mosaicplasty): preliminary report.

Authors:  Jacek Gagala; Marta Tarczyńska; Krzysztof Gawęda
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of osteochondral graft orientation in a biotribological test system.

Authors:  Christoph Bauer; Hakan Göçerler; Eugenia Niculescu-Morzsa; Vivek Jeyakumar; Christoph Stotter; Ivana Tóth; Thomas Klestil; Friedrich Franek; Stefan Nehrer
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Anisotropic properties of articular cartilage in an accelerated in vitro wear test.

Authors:  M Jayed Hossain; Hessam Noori-Dokht; Sonali Karnik; Naomi Alyafei; Amin Joukar; Stephen B Trippel; Diane R Wagner
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2020-05-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.