Literature DB >> 26660286

Compositional control of pore geometry in multivariate metal-organic frameworks: an experimental and computational study.

Laura K Cadman1, Jessica K Bristow1, Naomi E Stubbs1, Davide Tiana1, Mary F Mahon1, Aron Walsh1, Andrew D Burrows1.   

Abstract

A new approach is reported for tailoring the pore geometry in five series of multivariate metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) based on the structure [Zn2(bdc)2(dabco)] (bdc = 1,4-benzenedicarboxylate, dabco = 1,8-diazabicyclooctane), DMOF-1. A doping procedure has been adopted to form series of MOFs containing varying linker ratios. The series under investigation are [Zn2(bdc)(2-x)(bdc-Br)x(dabco)]·nDMF 1 (bdc-Br = 2-bromo-1,4-benzenedicarboxylate), [Zn2(bdc)(2-x)(bdc-I)x(dabco)]·nDMF 2 (bdc-I = 2-iodo-1,4-benzenedicarboxylate), [Zn2(bdc)(2-x)(bdc-NO2)x(dabco)]·nDMF 3 (bdc-NO2 = 2-nitro-1,4-benzenedicarboxylate), [Zn2(bdc)(2-x)(bdc-NH2)x(dabco)]·nDMF 4 (bdc-NH2 = 2-amino-1,4-benzenedicarboxylate) and [Zn2(bdc-Br)(2-x)(bdc-I)x(dabco)]·nDMF 5. Series 1-3 demonstrate a functionality-dependent pore geometry transition from the square, open pores of DMOF-1 to rhomboidal, narrow pores with increasing proportion of the 2-substituted bdc linker, with the rhomboidal-pore MOFs also showing a temperature-dependent phase change. In contrast, all members of series 4 and 5 have uniform pore geometries. In series 4 this is a square pore topology, whilst series 5 exhibits the rhomboidal pore form. Computational analyses reveal that the pore size and shape in systems 1 and 2 is altered through non-covalent interactions between the organic linkers within the framework, and that this can be controlled by the ligand functionality and ratio. This approach affords the potential to tailor pore geometry and shape within MOFs through judicious choice of ligand ratios.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 26660286     DOI: 10.1039/c5dt04045k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dalton Trans        ISSN: 1477-9226            Impact factor:   4.390


  4 in total

1.  Post-Synthetic Mannich Chemistry on Metal-Organic Frameworks: System-Specific Reactivity and Functionality-Triggered Dissolution.

Authors:  Harina Amer Hamzah; William J Gee; Paul R Raithby; Simon J Teat; Mary F Mahon; Andrew D Burrows
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.236

2.  Construction of fluorescence active MOFs with symmetrical and conformationally rigid N-2-aryl-triazole ligands.

Authors:  Jingyang Li; Ying He; Li Wang; Guanghua Li; Yongcun Zou; Yan Yan; Dandan Li; Xinli Shi; Zhiguang Song; Xiaodong Shi
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  Free Energy of Ligand Removal in the Metal-Organic Framework UiO-66.

Authors:  Jessica K Bristow; Katrine L Svane; Davide Tiana; Jonathan M Skelton; Julian D Gale; Aron Walsh
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 4.126

4.  Liquid phase blending of metal-organic frameworks.

Authors:  Louis Longley; Sean M Collins; Chao Zhou; Glen J Smales; Sarah E Norman; Nick J Brownbill; Christopher W Ashling; Philip A Chater; Robert Tovey; Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb; Thomas F Headen; Nicholas J Terrill; Yuanzheng Yue; Andrew J Smith; Frédéric Blanc; David A Keen; Paul A Midgley; Thomas D Bennett
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 14.919

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.