Fernando Althabe1, Alicia Alemán2, Mabel Berrueta1, Paola Morello1, Luz Gibbons1, Mercedes Colomar2, Van T Tong3, Patricia M Dietz3, Sherry L Farr3, Alvaro Ciganda2, Agustina Mazzoni1, Laura Llambí4, Ana Becú1, Ruben A Smith3, Carolyn Johnson5, José M Belizán1, Pierre M Buekens5. 1. Mother and Child Health Research Department, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS) , Buenos Aires , Argentina. 2. Division of Reproductive Health, Montevideo Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit , Montevideo , Uruguay. 3. Division of Reproductive Health/National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, GA. 4. Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la Republica , Montevideo , Uruguay. 5. Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine , New Orleans, LA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:Argentina and Uruguay have a high prevalence of smoking during pregnancy. However, and despite national recommendations, pregnant women are not routinely receiving cessation counseling during antenatal care (ANC). We evaluated a multifaceted strategy designed to increase the frequency of pregnant women who received a brief smoking cessation counseling based on the 5As (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, and Arrange). METHODS: We randomly assigned (1:1) 20 ANC clusters in Buenos Aires, Argentina and Montevideo, Uruguay to receive a multifaceted intervention to implement brief smoking cessation counseling into routine ANC, or to receive no intervention. The primary outcome was the frequency of women who recalled receiving the 5As during ANC at more than one visit. Frequency of women who smoked until the end of pregnancy, and attitudes and readiness of ANC providers towards providing counseling were secondary outcomes. Women's outcomes were measured at baseline and at the end of the 14- to 18-month intervention, by administering questionnaires at the postpartum hospital stay. Self-reported cessation was verified with saliva cotinine. The trial took place between October 03, 2011 and November 29, 2013. RESULTS: The rate of women who recalled receiving the 5As increased from 14.0% to 33.6% in the intervention group (median rate change, 22.1%), and from 10.8% to 17.0% in the control group (median rate change, 4.6%; P = .001 for the difference in change between groups). The effect of the intervention was larger in Argentina than in Uruguay. The proportion of women who continued smoking during pregnancy was unchanged at follow-up in both groups and the relative difference between groups was not statistically significant (ratio of odds ratios 1.16, 95% CI: 0.98-1.37; P = .086). No significant changes were observed in knowledge, attitudes, and self-confidence of ANC providers. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention showed a moderate effect in increasing the proportion of women who recalled receiving the 5As, with a third of women receiving counseling in more than one visit. However, the frequency of women who smoked until the end of the pregnancy was not significantly reduced by the intervention. IMPLICATIONS: No implementation trials of smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women have been carried out in Latin American or in middle-income countries where health care systems or capacities may differ. We evaluated a multifaceted strategy designed to increase the frequency of pregnant women who receive brief smoking cessation counseling based on the 5As in Argentina and Uruguay. We found that the intervention showed a moderate effect in increasing the proportion of women receiving the 5As, with a third of women receiving counseling in more than one visit. However, the frequency of women who smoked until the end of the pregnancy was not significantly reduced by the intervention. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco 2015. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Argentina and Uruguay have a high prevalence of smoking during pregnancy. However, and despite national recommendations, pregnant women are not routinely receiving cessation counseling during antenatal care (ANC). We evaluated a multifaceted strategy designed to increase the frequency of pregnant women who received a brief smoking cessation counseling based on the 5As (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, and Arrange). METHODS: We randomly assigned (1:1) 20 ANC clusters in Buenos Aires, Argentina and Montevideo, Uruguay to receive a multifaceted intervention to implement brief smoking cessation counseling into routine ANC, or to receive no intervention. The primary outcome was the frequency of women who recalled receiving the 5As during ANC at more than one visit. Frequency of women who smoked until the end of pregnancy, and attitudes and readiness of ANC providers towards providing counseling were secondary outcomes. Women's outcomes were measured at baseline and at the end of the 14- to 18-month intervention, by administering questionnaires at the postpartum hospital stay. Self-reported cessation was verified with saliva cotinine. The trial took place between October 03, 2011 and November 29, 2013. RESULTS: The rate of women who recalled receiving the 5As increased from 14.0% to 33.6% in the intervention group (median rate change, 22.1%), and from 10.8% to 17.0% in the control group (median rate change, 4.6%; P = .001 for the difference in change between groups). The effect of the intervention was larger in Argentina than in Uruguay. The proportion of women who continued smoking during pregnancy was unchanged at follow-up in both groups and the relative difference between groups was not statistically significant (ratio of odds ratios 1.16, 95% CI: 0.98-1.37; P = .086). No significant changes were observed in knowledge, attitudes, and self-confidence of ANC providers. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention showed a moderate effect in increasing the proportion of women who recalled receiving the 5As, with a third of women receiving counseling in more than one visit. However, the frequency of women who smoked until the end of the pregnancy was not significantly reduced by the intervention. IMPLICATIONS: No implementation trials of smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women have been carried out in Latin American or in middle-income countries where health care systems or capacities may differ. We evaluated a multifaceted strategy designed to increase the frequency of pregnant women who receive brief smoking cessation counseling based on the 5As in Argentina and Uruguay. We found that the intervention showed a moderate effect in increasing the proportion of women receiving the 5As, with a third of women receiving counseling in more than one visit. However, the frequency of women who smoked until the end of the pregnancy was not significantly reduced by the intervention. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco 2015. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
Authors: Jako S Burgers; Richard P T M Grol; Joost O M Zaat; Teun H Spies; Akke K van der Bij; Henk G A Mokkink Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Mabel Berrueta; Paola Morello; Alicia Alemán; Van T Tong; Carolyn Johnson; Patricia M Dietz; Sherry L Farr; Agustina Mazzoni; Mercedes Colomar; Alvaro Ciganda; Laura Llambi; Ana Becú; Luz Gibbons; Ruben A Smith; Pierre Buekens; Jose M Belizán; Fernando Althabe Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-06-27 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Mercedes Colomar; Van T Tong; Paola Morello; Sherry L Farr; Catalina Lawsin; Patricia M Dietz; Alicia Aleman; Mabel Berrueta; Agustina Mazzoni; Ana Becu; Pierre Buekens; José Belizán; Fernando Althabe Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2015-07
Authors: Michele Bloch; Fernando Althabe; Marie Onyamboko; Christine Kaseba-Sata; Eduardo E Castilla; Salvio Freire; Ana L Garces; Sailajanandan Parida; Shivaprasad S Goudar; Muhammad Masood Kadir; Norman Goco; Jutta Thornberry; Magdalena Daniels; Janet Bartz; Tyler Hartwell; Nancy Moss; Robert Goldenberg Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-02-28 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Noah M Ivers; Ilana J Halperin; Jan Barnsley; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Baiju R Shah; Karen Tu; Ross Upshur; Merrick Zwarenstein Journal: Trials Date: 2012-08-01 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Fernando Althabe; Alicia Alemán; Agustina Mazzoni; Mabel Berrueta; Paola Morello; Mercedes Colomar; Alvaro Ciganda; Ana Becú; Luz Gibbons; Laura Llambi; María G Bittar Gonzalez; Van T Tong; Sherry L Farr; Ruben A Smith; Patricia M Dietz; Carolyn Johnson; Pierre Buekens; José M Belizán Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2013-08-26 Impact factor: 3.223
Authors: Alicia Alemán; Paola Morello; Mercedes Colomar; Laura Llambi; Mabel Berrueta; Luz Gibbons; Pierre Buekens; Fernando Althabe Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-12-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Felix Naughton; Luis Reeves Vaz; Tim Coleman; Sophie Orton; Katharine Bowker; Jo Leonardi-Bee; Sue Cooper; Laura Vanderbloemen; Stephen Sutton; Michael Ussher Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Fernando Althabe; Elwyn Chomba; Antoinette K Tshefu; Ernest Banda; María Belizán; Eduardo Bergel; Mabel Berrueta; Jane Bertrand; Carl Bose; Maria Luisa Cafferata; Waldemar A Carlo; Alvaro Ciganda; France Donnay; Ezequiel García Elorrio; Luz Gibbons; Karen Klein; Jerker Liljestrand; Paul D Lusamba; Arlette K Mavila; Agustina Mazzoni; Dalau M Nkamba; Friday H Mwanakalanga; Abigail Mwapule Tembo; Musaku Mwenechanya; Lee Pyne-Mercier; Cintia Spira; Jean D Wetshikoy; Xu Xiong; Pierre Buekens Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2019-03-22 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Felix Naughton; Sarah Hopewell; Lesley Sinclair; Dorothy McCaughan; Jennifer McKell; Linda Bauld Journal: Br J Health Psychol Date: 2018-05-15