Literature DB >> 26659899

Determinants of time trade-off valuations for EQ-5D-5L health states: data from the Canadian EQ-5D-5L valuation study.

Fatima Al Sayah1, Nick Bansback2, Stirling Bryan2, Arto Ohinmaa1, Lise Poissant3, Eleanor Pullenayegum4, Feng Xie5,6,7, Jeffrey A Johnson8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that population subgroups have different perceptions of health, as well as different preferences for hypothetical health states.
OBJECTIVE: To identify determinants of health states preferences elicited using time trade-off (TTO) for the 5-level EQ-5D questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) in Canada.
METHODS: Data were from the Canadian EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study, which took place in Edmonton, Hamilton, Montreal, and Vancouver. Each respondent valued 10 of 86 hypothetical health states during an in-person interview using a computer-based TTO exercise. The TTO scores were the dependent variable and explanatory variables including age, sex, marital status, education, employment, annual household income, ethnicity, country of birth, dwelling, study site, health literacy, number of chronic conditions, previous experience with illness, and self-rated health.
RESULTS: Average [standard deviation (SD)] age of respondents (N = 1209) was 48 (17) years, and 45 % were male. In multivariable linear regression models with random effects, adjusted for severity of health states and inconsistencies in valuations, older age [unstandardized regression coefficient (β) = -0.077], male sex (β = 0.042), being married (β = 0.069), and urban dwelling (β = -0.055) were significantly associated with health states scores. Additionally, participants from Edmonton (β = -0.124) and Vancouver (β = -0.156), but not those from Hamilton, had significantly lower TTO scores than those from Montreal.
CONCLUSIONS: Socio-demographic characteristics were the main determinants of preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states in this study. Interestingly, preferences were significantly lower in western Canadian cities compared to eastern ones, bringing into question whether a single preference algorithm is suitable for use in all parts of Canada.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canada; EQ-5D; Health preferences; Time trade-off (TTO)

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26659899     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1203-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  24 in total

Review 1.  EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group.

Authors:  R Rabin; F de Charro
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.709

2.  A uniform time trade off method for states better and worse than dead: feasibility study of the 'lead time' approach.

Authors:  Nancy J Devlin; Aki Tsuchiya; Ken Buckingham; Carl Tilling
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds.

Authors:  G L Albrecht; P J Devlieger
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Prevalence of multimorbidity among adults seen in family practice.

Authors:  Martin Fortin; Gina Bravo; Catherine Hudon; Alain Vanasse; Lise Lapointe
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  The effect of past and present illness experience on the valuations of health states.

Authors:  P Kind; P Dolan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population.

Authors:  Lisa D Chew; Joan M Griffin; Melissa R Partin; Siamak Noorbaloochi; Joseph P Grill; Annamay Snyder; Katharine A Bradley; Sean M Nugent; Alisha D Baines; Michelle Vanryn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Health state valuations of patients and the general public analytically compared: a meta-analytical comparison of patient and population health state utilities.

Authors:  Yvette Peeters; Anne M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 5.725

8.  The effect of chronic conditions on stated preferences for health.

Authors:  A Simon Pickard; Rima Tawk; James W Shaw
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2012-09-01

9.  Are patients' judgments of health status really different from the general population?

Authors:  Paul Fm Krabbe; Noor Tromp; Theo Jm Ruers; Piet Lcm van Riel
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L).

Authors:  M Herdman; C Gudex; A Lloyd; Mf Janssen; P Kind; D Parkin; G Bonsel; X Badia
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  12 in total

1.  Health literacy and logical inconsistencies in valuations of hypothetical health states: results from the Canadian EQ-5D-5L valuation study.

Authors:  Fatima Al Sayah; Jeffrey A Johnson; Arto Ohinmaa; Feng Xie; Nick Bansback
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Comparison of health state values derived from patients and individuals from the general population.

Authors:  Mihir Gandhi; Ru San Tan; Raymond Ng; Su Pin Choo; Whay Kuang Chia; Chee Keong Toh; Carolyn Lam; Phong Teck Lee; Nang Khaing Zar Latt; Kim Rand-Hendriksen; Yin Bun Cheung; Nan Luo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  EQ-5D-5L: a value set for Romania.

Authors:  Elena Olariu; Wael Mohammed; Yemi Oluboyede; Raluca Caplescu; Ileana Gabriela Niculescu-Aron; Marian Sorin Paveliu; Luke Vale
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2022-06-10

4.  A comparison of health utility scores calculated using United Kingdom and Canadian preference weights in persons with alzheimer's disease and their caregivers.

Authors:  Mingying Fang; Mark Oremus; Jean-Eric Tarride; Parminder Raina
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Cultural Values: Can They Explain Differences in Health Utilities between Countries?

Authors:  Bram Roudijk; A Rogier T Donders; Peep F M Stalmeier
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Transforming challenges into opportunities: conducting health preference research during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

Authors:  Manraj N Kaur; Richard L Skolasky; Philip A Powell; Feng Xie; I-Chan Huang; Ayse Kuspinar; John L O'Dwyer; Amy M Cizik; Donna Rowen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 3.440

7.  Examining the Association between Polish Migrant Status and Health Preferences Using a Novel Application of a Smaller Design EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study.

Authors:  Dan Kelleher; Samer Kharroubi; Edel Doherty; Gianluca Baio; Ciaran O'Neill
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2022-01-26

8.  Do health preferences differ among Asian populations? A comparison of EQ-5D-5L discrete choice experiments data from 11 Asian studies.

Authors:  Zhihao Yang; Fredrick Dermawan Purba; Asrul Akmal Shafie; Ataru Igarashi; Eliza Lai-Yi Wong; Hilton Lam; Hoang Van Minh; Hsiang-Wen Lin; Jeonghoon Ahn; Juntana Pattanaphesaj; Min-Woo Jo; Vu Quynh Mai; Jan Busschbach; Nan Luo; Jie Jiang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.440

9.  A Computer-Assisted Personal Interview App in Research Electronic Data Capture for Administering Time Trade-off Surveys (REDCap): Development and Pretest.

Authors:  Mark Oremus; Anis Sharafoddini; Gian Paolo Morgano; Xuejing Jin; Feng Xie
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2018-01-23

10.  Evaluation of PROMIS Preference Scoring System (PROPr) in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis or Kidney Transplant.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Barry Dewitt; Evan Tang; Daniel Breitner; Mohammed Saqib; Dan Li; Rabail Siddiqui; Nathaniel Edwards; John Devin Peipert; Ron D Hays; Janel Hanmer; Istvan Mucsi
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 10.614

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.