Asbjørn M Scholtens1, Hein J Verberne2, Ricardo P J Budde3, Marnix G E H Lam4. 1. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands a.scholtens@meandermc.nl. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Radiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and. 4. Department of Imaging, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Adequate suppression of cardiac glucose metabolism increases the interpretability and diagnostic reliability of (18)F-FDG PET studies performed to detect cardiac inflammation and infection. There are no standardized guidelines, though prolonged fasting (>6 h), carbohydrate-restricted diets, fatty meals, and heparin loading all have been proposed. The aim of this study was to compare the 3 preparatory protocols used in our institution. METHODS: (18)F-FDG PET scans were selected and grouped according to 3 preparatory protocols (50 consecutive scans per group): 6-h fast (group 1), low-carbohydrate diet plus 12-h fast (group 2), and low-carbohydrate diet plus 12-h fast plus intravenous heparin preadministration (50 IU/kg) (group 3). Consecutive scans were retrospectively included from time frames during which the particular protocol was used. Group 1 included oncologic indications, and groups 2 and 3 infection or inflammation detection. Cardiac segments for which inflammation or infection foci had been confirmed on other imaging modalities were excluded from the analysis. (18)F-FDG uptake in normal myocardium was scored according to a scale ranging from 0 (uptake less than that in left ventricle blood pool) to 4 (diffuse uptake greater than that in liver). Adequate suppression was defined as uptake less than that in liver and without any focus (scores 0-2). RESULTS: Adequate suppression differed significantly between groups: 28% in group 1, 54% in group 2, and 88% in group 3 (P< 0.0001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Single-dose heparin administration before (18)F-FDG PET in addition to a low-carbohydrate diet significantly outperforms a low-carbohydrate diet alone in adequately suppressing cardiac glucose metabolism.
UNLABELLED: Adequate suppression of cardiac glucose metabolism increases the interpretability and diagnostic reliability of (18)F-FDG PET studies performed to detect cardiac inflammation and infection. There are no standardized guidelines, though prolonged fasting (>6 h), carbohydrate-restricted diets, fatty meals, and heparin loading all have been proposed. The aim of this study was to compare the 3 preparatory protocols used in our institution. METHODS: (18)F-FDG PET scans were selected and grouped according to 3 preparatory protocols (50 consecutive scans per group): 6-h fast (group 1), low-carbohydrate diet plus 12-h fast (group 2), and low-carbohydrate diet plus 12-h fast plus intravenous heparin preadministration (50 IU/kg) (group 3). Consecutive scans were retrospectively included from time frames during which the particular protocol was used. Group 1 included oncologic indications, and groups 2 and 3 infection or inflammation detection. Cardiac segments for which inflammation or infection foci had been confirmed on other imaging modalities were excluded from the analysis. (18)F-FDG uptake in normal myocardium was scored according to a scale ranging from 0 (uptake less than that in left ventricle blood pool) to 4 (diffuse uptake greater than that in liver). Adequate suppression was defined as uptake less than that in liver and without any focus (scores 0-2). RESULTS: Adequate suppression differed significantly between groups: 28% in group 1, 54% in group 2, and 88% in group 3 (P< 0.0001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Single-dose heparin administration before (18)F-FDG PET in addition to a low-carbohydrate diet significantly outperforms a low-carbohydrate diet alone in adequately suppressing cardiac glucose metabolism.
Authors: Sophia R Larson; Justin A Pieper; Edward A Hulten; Edward P Ficaro; James R Corbett; Venkatesh L Murthy; Richard L Weinberg Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Michael T Osborne; Edward A Hulten; Venkatesh L Murthy; Hicham Skali; Viviany R Taqueti; Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo F DiCarli; Ron Blankstein Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Riemer H J A Slart; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Patrizio Lancellotti; Fabien Hyafil; Ron Blankstein; Ronald G Schwartz; Wael A Jaber; Raymond Russell; Alessia Gimelli; François Rouzet; Marcus Hacker; Olivier Gheysens; Sven Plein; Edward J Miller; Sharmila Dorbala; Erwan Donal Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 5.952