Literature DB >> 26659186

An observational radiative constraint on hydrologic cycle intensification.

Anthony M DeAngelis1, Xin Qu1, Mark D Zelinka2, Alex Hall1.   

Abstract

Intensification of the hydrologic cycle is a key dimension of climate change, with substantial impacts on human and natural systems. A basic measure of hydrologic cycle intensification is the increase in global-mean precipitation per unit surface warming, which varies by a factor of three in current-generation climate models (about 1-3 per cent per kelvin). Part of the uncertainty may originate from atmosphere-radiation interactions. As the climate warms, increases in shortwave absorption from atmospheric moistening will suppress the precipitation increase. This occurs through a reduction of the latent heating increase required to maintain a balanced atmospheric energy budget. Using an ensemble of climate models, here we show that such models tend to underestimate the sensitivity of solar absorption to variations in atmospheric water vapour, leading to an underestimation in the shortwave absorption increase and an overestimation in the precipitation increase. This sensitivity also varies considerably among models due to differences in radiative transfer parameterizations, explaining a substantial portion of model spread in the precipitation response. Consequently, attaining accurate shortwave absorption responses through improvements to the radiative transfer schemes could reduce the spread in the predicted global precipitation increase per degree warming for the end of the twenty-first century by about 35 per cent, and reduce the estimated ensemble-mean increase in this quantity by almost 40 per cent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26659186     DOI: 10.1038/nature15770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  8 in total

1.  PDRMIP: A Precipitation Driver and Response Model Intercomparison Project, Protocol and preliminary results.

Authors:  G Myhre; P M Forster; B H Samset; Ø Hodnebrog; J Sillmann; S G Aalbergsjø; T Andrews; O Boucher; G Faluvegi; D Fläschner; T Iversen; M Kasoar; V Kharin; J-F Lamarque; D Olivié; T Richardson; D Shindell; K P Shine; Camilla W Stjern; T Takemura; A Voulgarakis; F Zwiers
Journal:  Bull Am Meteorol Soc       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 8.766

2.  Differences in the Hydrological Cycle and Sensitivity Between Multiscale Modeling Frameworks with and without a Higher-order Turbulence Closure.

Authors:  Kuan-Man Xu; Zhujun Li; Anning Cheng; Peter N Blossey; Cristiana Stan
Journal:  J Adv Model Earth Syst       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 6.660

3.  Northern Hemisphere hydroclimate variability over the past twelve centuries.

Authors:  Fredrik Charpentier Ljungqvist; Paul J Krusic; Hanna S Sundqvist; Eduardo Zorita; Gudrun Brattström; David Frank
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Tightening of tropical ascent and high clouds key to precipitation change in a warmer climate.

Authors:  Hui Su; Jonathan H Jiang; J David Neelin; T Janice Shen; Chengxing Zhai; Qing Yue; Zhien Wang; Lei Huang; Yong-Sang Choi; Graeme L Stephens; Yuk L Yung
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Divergent global-scale temperature effects from identical aerosols emitted in different regions.

Authors:  Geeta G Persad; Ken Caldeira
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Ocean surface energy balance allows a constraint on the sensitivity of precipitation to global warming.

Authors:  Wei Wang; T C Chakraborty; Wei Xiao; Xuhui Lee
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Scientific data from precipitation driver response model intercomparison project.

Authors:  Gunnar Myhre; Bjørn Samset; Piers M Forster; Øivind Hodnebrog; Marit Sandstad; Christian W Mohr; Jana Sillmann; Camilla W Stjern; Timothy Andrews; Olivier Boucher; Gregory Faluvegi; Trond Iversen; Jean-Francois Lamarque; Matthew Kasoar; Alf Kirkevåg; Ryan Kramer; Longbo Liu; Johannes Mülmenstädt; Dirk Olivié; Johannes Quaas; Thomas B Richardson; Dilshad Shawki; Drew Shindell; Chris Smith; Philip Stier; Tao Tang; Toshihiko Takemura; Apostolos Voulgarakis; Duncan Watson-Parris
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 6.444

8.  Balancing Accuracy, Efficiency, and Flexibility in Radiation Calculations for Dynamical Models.

Authors:  Robert Pincus; Eli J Mlawer; Jennifer S Delamere
Journal:  J Adv Model Earth Syst       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 6.660

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.