Laurent de Landsheere1,2, Mathias Brieu3, Silvia Blacher4, Carine Munaut4, Betty Nusgens5, Chrystèle Rubod6, Agnès Noel4, Jean-Michel Foidart7,4, Michelle Nisolle7,4, Michel Cosson6. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Liège, CHR La Citadelle, Boulevard du 12e de ligne, n°1, 4000, Liège, Belgium. ldelandsheere@chu.ulg.ac.be. 2. Laboratory of Tumor and Development Biology, GIGA-Cancer, University of Liège, CHU Sart-Tilman, Avenue de l'Hôpital, 4000, Liège, Belgium. ldelandsheere@chu.ulg.ac.be. 3. LML, CNRS UMR 8107, Ecole centrale de Lille, University Nord de France, Lille, France. 4. Laboratory of Tumor and Development Biology, GIGA-Cancer, University of Liège, CHU Sart-Tilman, Avenue de l'Hôpital, 4000, Liège, Belgium. 5. Laboratory of Connective Tissues Biology, GIGA-Cancer, University of Liège, CHU Sart-Tilman, Avenue de l'Hôpital, 4000, Liège, Belgium. 6. Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Avenue Oscar Lambret, n°2, 59037, Lille Cedex, France. 7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Liège, CHR La Citadelle, Boulevard du 12e de ligne, n°1, 4000, Liège, Belgium.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the study was to correlate histological and biomechanical characteristics of the vaginal wall in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: Tissue samples were collected from the anterior [point Ba; POP Questionnaire (POP-Q)] and/or posterior (point Bp; POP-Q) vaginal wall of 15 women who underwent vaginal surgery for POP. Both histological and biomechanical assessments were performed from the same tissue samples in 14 of 15 patients. For histological assessment, the density of collagen and elastin fibers was determined by combining high-resolution virtual imaging and computer-assisted digital image analysis. For biomechanical testing, uniaxial tension tests were performed to evaluate vaginal tissue stiffness at low (C0) and high (C1) deformation rates. RESULTS: Biomechanical testing highlights the hyperelastic behavior of the vaginal wall. At low strains (C0), vaginal tissue appeared stiffer when elastin density was low. We found a statistically significant inverse relationship between C0 and the elastin/collagen ratio (p = 0.048) in the lamina propria. However, at large strain levels (C1), no clear relationship was observed between elastin density or elastin/collagen ratio and stiffness, likely reflecting the large dispersion of the mechanical behavior of the tissue samples. CONCLUSION: Histological and biomechanical properties of the vaginal wall vary from patient to patient. This study suggests that elastin density deserves consideration as a relevant factor of vaginal stiffness in women with POP.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the study was to correlate histological and biomechanical characteristics of the vaginal wall in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: Tissue samples were collected from the anterior [point Ba; POP Questionnaire (POP-Q)] and/or posterior (point Bp; POP-Q) vaginal wall of 15 women who underwent vaginal surgery for POP. Both histological and biomechanical assessments were performed from the same tissue samples in 14 of 15 patients. For histological assessment, the density of collagen and elastin fibers was determined by combining high-resolution virtual imaging and computer-assisted digital image analysis. For biomechanical testing, uniaxial tension tests were performed to evaluate vaginal tissue stiffness at low (C0) and high (C1) deformation rates. RESULTS: Biomechanical testing highlights the hyperelastic behavior of the vaginal wall. At low strains (C0), vaginal tissue appeared stiffer when elastin density was low. We found a statistically significant inverse relationship between C0 and the elastin/collagen ratio (p = 0.048) in the lamina propria. However, at large strain levels (C1), no clear relationship was observed between elastin density or elastin/collagen ratio and stiffness, likely reflecting the large dispersion of the mechanical behavior of the tissue samples. CONCLUSION: Histological and biomechanical properties of the vaginal wall vary from patient to patient. This study suggests that elastin density deserves consideration as a relevant factor of vaginal stiffness in women with POP.
Entities:
Keywords:
Biomechanics; Collagen; Connective tissue; Elastin; Pelvic organ prolapse; Vagina
Authors: R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Gunhilde M Buchsbaum; Erin E Duecy; Lindsey A Kerr; Li-Shan Huang; MaryAnn Perevich; David S Guzick Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: A Liapis; P Bakas; A Pafiti; M Frangos-Plemenos; N Arnoyannaki; G Creatsas Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 2.435
Authors: Jennifer M Wu; Catherine A Matthews; Mitchell M Conover; Virginia Pate; Michele Jonsson Funk Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Daniela Ulrich; Sharon L Edwards; Kai Su; Jacinta F White; John A M Ramshaw; Graham Jenkin; Jan Deprest; Anna Rosamilia; Jerome A Werkmeister; Caroline E Gargett Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Shataakshi Dahal; Mei Kuang; Anna Rietsch; R S Butler; Anand Ramamurthi; Margot S Damaser Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 4.219
Authors: Surya C Gnyawali; Mithun Sinha; Mohamed S El Masry; Brian Wulff; Subhadip Ghatak; Fidel Soto-Gonzalez; Traci A Wilgus; Sashwati Roy; Chandan K Sen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 3.240