Mai Nanya1,2, Masaki Sato1, Kousuke Tanimoto3, Minoru Tozuka2, Shuki Mizutani1, Masatoshi Takagi1. 1. Department of Pediatrics and Developmental Biology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Analytical Laboratory Chemistry, Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. 3. Department of genomics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
Etoposide, a topoisomerase 2 (TOP2) inhibitor, is associated with the development of KMT2A (MLL)-rearranged infant leukemia. An epidemiological study suggested that in utero exposure to TOP2 inhibitors may be involved in generation of KMT2A (MLL) rearrangement. The present study examined the mechanism underlying the development of KMT2A (MLL)-rearranged infant leukemia in response to in utero exposure to etoposide in a mouse model. Fetal liver hematopoietic stem cells were more susceptible to etoposide than maternal bone marrow mononuclear cells. Etoposide-induced Kmt2a breakage was detected in fetal liver hematopoietic stem cells using a newly developed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay. Assessment of etoposide-induced chromosomal translocation by next-generation RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) identified several chimeric fusion messenger RNAs that were generated by etoposide treatment. However, Kmt2a (Mll)-rearranged fusion mRNA was detected in Atm-knockout mice, which are defective in the DNA damage response, but not in wild-type mice. The present findings suggest that in utero exposure to TOP2 inhibitors induces Kmt2a rearrangement when the DNA damage response is defective.
Etoposide, a topoisomerase 2 (TOP2) inhibitor, is associated with the development of KMT2A (MLL)-rearranged infant leukemia. An epidemiological study suggested that in utero exposure to TOP2 inhibitors may be involved in generation of KMT2A (MLL) rearrangement. The present study examined the mechanism underlying the development of KMT2A (MLL)-rearranged infant leukemia in response to in utero exposure to etoposide in a mouse model. Fetal liver hematopoietic stem cells were more susceptible to etoposide than maternal bone marrow mononuclear cells. Etoposide-induced Kmt2a breakage was detected in fetal liver hematopoietic stem cells using a newly developed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay. Assessment of etoposide-induced chromosomal translocation by next-generation RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) identified several chimeric fusion messenger RNAs that were generated by etoposide treatment. However, Kmt2a (Mll)-rearranged fusion mRNA was detected in Atm-knockout mice, which are defective in the DNA damage response, but not in wild-type mice. The present findings suggest that in utero exposure to TOP2 inhibitors induces Kmt2a rearrangement when the DNA damage response is defective.
The topoisomerase 2 (TOP2) inhibitor etoposide induces DNA double-strand breaks
between the S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle. Etoposide is widely used as a
chemotherapeutic agent against solid tumors and hematological malignances. However,
etoposide induces chemotherapy-associated secondary leukemia, which involves
rearrangement of the KMT2A (MLL) gene on
chromosome 11q23 [1]. The
KMT2A protein is a transcriptional coactivator that plays an essential role in
regulating gene expression during early development and hematopoiesis. Chromosomal
translocations involving KMT2A are responsible for some cases of
de novo acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid
leukemia (AML). In addition to their role in chemotherapy-associated secondary
leukemia, chromosomal translocations involving KMT2A are associated
with infant leukemia [2]
[3] [4]. In ALL,
KMT2A translocations are associated with poor clinical outcome
[5].Investigation of identical twin pairs with infant leukemia provided evidence of the
in utero transfer of leukemic cells from one twin to the other
[6], and the in
utero origin of this cancer was confirmed by retrospective analyses of
neonatal blood spots (Guthrie cards) from affected infants [7]. The high concordance rate
for leukemia in monozygotic twins and the short latency of the disease suggest that
KMT2A fusion in fetal hematopoietic stem cells (FL-HSCs) causes
infant leukemia. Therefore, determining how KMT2A gene alterations
occur in utero is important. The findings described above suggest
the possibility that KMT2A-rearranged infant leukemia is caused by
transplacental exposure to TOP2 inhibitors. Although it is unusual for a pregnant
woman to be directly exposed to drugs such as etoposide, other compounds in the
environment may exert similar effects. For example, benzoquinones from cigarette
smoke, isoflavones from soybeans, flavonoids from citrus or tea, lignans from flax
and sesame seed, some herbal medicines, laxatives such as senna, podophyllin resin,
quinolone antibiotics, and some pesticides including certain fungicidals and
mosquitocidals can act as TOP2 inhibitors [8]. Indeed, several dietary bioflavonoids induce cleavage
of KMT2A [9], and epidemiological studies indicate an elevated risk of leukemia in
infants exposed in utero to DNA-damaging drugs, herbal medicines,
dipyrone, and mosquitocidals [8].To elucidate the etiology of infant leukemia, it would be useful to combine
epidemiological and case-based genomic studies with cell-biological analyses.
Although several previous studies successfully detected TOP2 inhibitor-dependent
KMT2A rearrangement in vitro [10-12], such rearrangements have
not been observed in vivo. Furthermore, because the access to human
fetuses is limited, no experimental model of in utero exposure has
been reported to date. To overcome this obstacle, we used a mouse model to
investigate how maternal exposure to etoposide affects the Kmt2a
(Mll) gene in fetal hematopoietic cells.The DNA damage response pathway is critical for the maintenance of genome integrity.
For example, spontaneous chromosomal translocation in circulating lymphocytes is
observed in ataxia telangiectasia, which is caused by mutation of ataxia
telangiectasia mutated (ATM). ATM is a central player in the DNA damage response and
exerts its function by phosphorylating a variety of substrates including histone
H2AFX (H2AX) [13]. We
previously demonstrated that a defective DNA damage response via ATM is required for
KMT2A rearrangement in vitro [14].In the present study, we showed that in utero exposure to a TOP2
inhibitor induces Kmt2a breakage in the mouse fetus. In addition,
we showed that rearrangements involving the Kmt2a gene occur only
in mice with defects in the DNA damage response, and not in wild-type animals.
Materials and Methods
Mice
This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations of the
Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Tokyo Medical and Dental
University. C57BL/6 mice were used in the study. Atm-deficient mice
(Atm
-/-) [15] were backcrossed onto the C57BL/6 background for
more than 15 generations. Mice were bred in a specific pathogen-free unit in the
vivarium of Tokyo Medical and Dental University. Approximately 100 mice were
used in this study. Mice were sacrificed using carbon dioxide (CO2)
according to science council of Japan guidelines on animal experiment.
Experimental manipulations and animal care were approved by the Tokyo Medical
and Dental University Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol numbers 0140017A
and 010018A).
Etoposide concentration measurement
Fetal liver was homogenized and centrifuged (13,000 rpm for 15 min). Serum
fractions were subjected to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to
measure etoposide concentration.
Fetal livers were homogenized, and mononuclear cells (MNCs) were isolated using
Ficoll-Paque Plus (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). Ter119-positive cells
were removed from MNCs. Then, CD117+ CD45+ cells were
positively isolated using a MACS system (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA, USA).
Flow cytometry
FL-HSCs and maternal bone marrow (mBM) cells were fixed in 1% formaldehyde in PBS
for 15 min on ice. After washing in PBS, cells were resuspended in 70% ice-cold
ethanol, and then incubated at ˗20°C overnight. The cells were
then washed twice with PBS and incubated for 30 min at room temperature (RT) in
1 μl of mouse FcR blocking reagent (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA, USA) in
50 μl of PBS containing 1% BSA (0.5 μg/50 μl). To detect
γH2AX (Serine 139 phosphorylated H2AX), 2 × 105 cells
were incubated for 1 h at RT with FITC-conjugated γH2AX antibody (EMD
Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) diluted in PBS/1% BSA. After two washes in PBS,
cells were resuspended in 1 ml of PBS containing 5 μg/ml propidium iodide
(PI) (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) and 200 μg/ml RNase A
(Sigma-Aldrich) by stirring for 20 min at 37°C. Flow cytometry was
performed on a FACS Calibur instrument (Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA).
Phospho H3-positive cells were detected using Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated
phospho-Histone H3 Serine 10 antibody (EMD Millipore).
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay
FL-HSCs were isolated from five pregnant mice on day 13.5 and resuspended in 5 ml
of PBS, fixed by addition of 5 ml of 2% formaldehyde in PBS, and incubated for
10 min at RT with rotation. Fixation was quenched by addition of 513 μl
of 2.5 M Glycine in PBS (pH 7.0), and the samples were incubated for an
additional 5 min at RT with rotation. Cells were washed with PBS twice, and then
lysed with cell lysis buffer I (10 mM HEPES [pH 6.5], 10 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA,
0.25% Triton X-100, and protease inhibitors) for 10 min on ice. After
centrifugation and removal of the supernatant, 600 μl of nuclear lysis
buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl [pH 8.0], 10 mM EDTA, and 1% SDS) was added, and the
samples were incubated for 10 min on ice. The cells were sonicated (four rounds
of 10 sec duration, amplitude 6) on ice using BRANSON SONIFIER 250 (Danbury, CT,
USA). Samples were centrifuged (13,000 rpm for 15 min), and the supernatant was
transferred to a new tube and diluted with five volumes of dilution buffer (1%
Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-Cl [pH 8.1], and 150 mM NaCl). The diluted
supernatant was pre-cleared with 30 μl of protein A-Sepharose coated with
salmon sperm DNA and rabbit IgG for 1 h at 4°C with rotation. After
pre-clearing, a 1 ml aliquot of supernatant was transferred to a new tube, and
protein A Dynabeads (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) coated with rabbit
polyclonal γH2AX antibody (EMD Millipore) (1 μg/30 μl
Dynabeads) were added; the mixture was then incubated for 2 h at 4°C with
rotation. Immunoprecipitated proteins were washed five times with RIPA buffer
containing 0.5 M LiCl, followed by two washes with Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer.
Antibody/protein/DNA complexes were eluted with 150 μl of elution buffer
(0.1 M NaHCO3 and 1% SDS) and vortexing; this process was repeated,
and both eluates were combined in the same tube. One microliter of RNase A (from
10 mg/ml stock) was added, and the samples were incubated at 37°C for 1
h. To extract DNA, 7.5 μl of proteinase K (from 500 μg/ml stock)
was added, and the sample was incubated at 42°C for 3 h. To reverse
formaldehyde cross-links, the samples were incubated at 65°C overnight.
DNA was purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden,
Germany) and eluted in 30 μl of distilled water. PCR primers were as
follows: humanBCL9L region I
CTCTGAATCGAGGGATGGAG and
GGCCAACCAGATCTCACCTA, humanKMT2A
region II GCAGGCACTTTGAACATCCT and
CCAGTTGGTGCTGATTTCCT, region III
TGGAAAGGACAAACCAGACC and
CACTGCGGGAGATTCAGAGT, region IV
CTCTGAATCTCCCGCAGTGT and
AGGGCTCACAACAGACTTGG, mouseBcl9l
region I CTCTGAATCGAGGGATGGAG and
GGCCAACCAGATCTCACCTA, mouseKmt2a
region II TTCTCAGGAATTGGAGCCAC and,
CGGAATGTGCTAAATGCAGA, region III
TGTATGACTATGCACTGGGATTGA and,
GAAGGCAATGGGCGGCAG, region IV
TGGTTACCTGAATTATGTCCCCAG and
GTTCAGGAACTTGCGGCATTTTT. PCR condition was
96°C 30 sec, 60°C 30 sec, 72°C 30 sec, 35 cycle
amplification.
Western blotting
Aliquots of 1 × 106 FL-HSCs isolated from five fetal livers
from pregnant mice on day 13.5 were washed with PBS and lysed in RIPA buffer
(150 mM NaCl, 1.0% NP-40, 0.1% SDS, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, 5 mM EDTA, and 10
mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4]) containing protease inhibitors. Protein concentration was
measured using the DC Protein Assay Kit (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA, USA). After
boiling with sample buffer, 30 μg of protein was subjected to SDS-PAGE
and transferred to a membrane. Blots were probed with anti-ATM (4D2),
anti–phospho-ATMSerine 1981 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA,
USA), anti-γH2AX (Cell Signaling Technology), or β-actin
(Sigma-Aldrich) antibody. Primary antibodies were detected using horseradish
peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody (GE Healthcare, Little
Chalfont, UK).
RNA sequencing (RNA-seq)
Atm
+/- female mice were crossed with
Atm
+/- male mice. Pregnant
Atm
+/- females on day 13.5 were
intraperitoneally (IP) injected with saline or 0.5 mg/kg etoposide on 3
consecutive days, and sacrificed 24 h after the final injection. After
genotyping, samples were subjected to RNA-seq. Total RNA was extracted from
FL-HSCs using Trizol (Life Technologies) or RNeasy (QIAGEN). The integrity and
purity of total RNA were assessed by OD260/280 and using an Agilent Bioanalyzer
2100. cDNA (1–2 μg) was generated using the Clontech SmartPCR cDNA
kit (Clontech Laboratories, Mountain View, CA, USA) from 100 ng of total RNA,
and adaptors were removed by digestion with RsaI. The resultant
cDNA was fragmented using a Covaris sonicator (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA),
profiled using an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100, and subjected to Illumina library
preparation using NEBNext reagents (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) or
the TruSeq RNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The quality,
quantity, and size distribution of the Illumina libraries were determined using
an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100. The libraries were then subjected to sequencing on
an Illumina HiSeq 1500 or HiSeq 2000 according to standard protocols. Paired-end
90 or 100 nucleotide (nt) reads were generated, and the data quality was checked
using FASTQC (Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK).
Metaphase spread
FL-HSCs from pregnant mice on day 13.5 were enriched from mouse fetal livers
using MACS beads (Miltenyi, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and cultured with
Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium in the presence of 50 ng/ml
SCF, 10 ng/ml IL3, and 10 ng/ml IL6 for 24 h. Cells were treated in 75 mM KCl at
37°C for 15–30 min and fixed by addition of ice-cold fixative (1:3
acetic acid:methanol). Metaphase spreads were obtained by dropping fixed cells
onto slides. Slides were air-dried overnight and stained with DAPI.
Data analysis
Fusion mRNAs were analyzed using TopHat software [16]. Frame analysis of fusion mRNA was performed
based on our own developed script (Amerlieff, Tokyo, Japan). Functional
annotation of RNA sequence data was performed using DAVID Bioinformatics
Resources 6.7 [17]. Heat
maps and clustering were generated using MeV4.0. Data are expressed as means
± S.E. The Mann–Whitney U test or t-test was used for statistical
analysis; P values <0.05 were considered significant
(*, P < 0.05; and †,
P < 0.01).
Results
Fetal concentration of etoposide following maternal exposure
Etoposide concentration was measured in fetuses after IP injection of 10 mg/kg
etoposide into pregnant female mice on day 13.5. The etoposide concentration in
the fetus decreased rapidly, and was undetectable at 2.5 h after the injection
(Fig 1); when a dose of
0.5 mg/kg was administered, etoposide was not detectable even immediately after
injection (data not shown). The pharmacokinetics data were as follows: area
under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC), 266 mg/dl/h; terminal
elimination rate constant (Kel), 1.406/h-1; elimination half-life
(T1/2), 0.492 h; volume of distribution (Vd), 0.045 l; clearance
(CL), 0.0636 l/h; and clearance total (CLtot), 0.0636 l/h. These data
suggest that fetuses were exposed to etoposide at a concentration of at least
less than 5 μM for 2 h following IP injection of mothers with a dose of
10 mg/kg. However, the effective concentration in fetal cells following maternal
injection at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg could not be determined.
Fig 1
Fetal etoposide concentration after intraperitoneal (IP) etoposide
injection.
Etoposide (10 mg/kg) was IP injected into E13.5 pregnant mice, and fetal
livers were collected at the indicated time points.
Fetal etoposide concentration after intraperitoneal (IP) etoposide
injection.
Etoposide (10 mg/kg) was IP injected into E13.5 pregnant mice, and fetal
livers were collected at the indicated time points.
DNA double-strand breaks in the FL-HSC and maternal BM MNC after etoposide
injection
DNA damage was examined in FL-HSCs from pregnant female mice on day 13.5 and
maternal BM MNCs in response to IP injection of etoposide into pregnant mice.
γH2AX (Serine 139 phosphorylated H2AX) is a molecular marker of DNA
damage, including DNA double-strand and single-strand breaks. The percentage of
γH2AX-positive cells was measured by flow cytometry. The dose-dependence
of DNA damage induction in FL-HSCs was investigated using γH2AX
positivity as an indicator. IP injection of 0.2–0.5 mg/kg etoposide into
pregnant mice induced minimal DNA damage in the FL-HSC, and γH2AX
positivity gradually increased in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 2A). γH2AX
induction by low concentrations of etoposide (0.5 mg/kg) was not significantly
detectable by flow cytometry; therefore, a relatively high dose of etoposide (10
mg/kg) was used to characterize the in vivo effects on the
fetus. Kinetic analysis revealed that γH2AX-positive cells were
detectable in the FL-HSC and maternal BM MNC immediately after injection of 10
mg/kg etoposide, reaching a peak at 1–2 h in the maternal BM MNC and at 4
h in the FL-HSC. γH2AX-positive cells were more frequent in the FL-HSC
than in the maternal BM MNC (Fig 2B
and 2C and S1A and S1B Fig). In addition to
becoming γH2AX-positive, FL-HSCs exhibited activation of ATM, which plays
a central role in the DNA damage checkpoint (S1C Fig). Apoptosis was induced at
2 h after IP injection in maternal BM MNCs and, at a higher rate, in the FL-HSC
(Fig 2B and 2D). The
percentage of apoptotic cells reached a peak at 4 h after IP injection and
decreased over the next 4 h, possibly because of the clearance of dead
cells.
Fig 2
(A) Dose-dependence of γH2AX positivity in fetal liver
hematopoietic stem cells (FL-HSCs), analyzed 4 h after IP injection of
etoposide at the indicated doses. Etoposide was IP injected into E13.5
pregnant mice. (B) DNA double-strand breaks were detected according to
γH2AX positivity, and cell-cycle distribution was monitored by
propidium iodide (PI) incorporation. Etoposide (10 mg/kg) was IP
injected into E13.5 pregnant mice, and samples were analyzed at the
indicated time points. A two-dimensional dot blot is shown. FL-HSC:
fetal liver hematopoietic stem cells; mBM: maternal bone marrow mono
nuclear cells. (C) The kinetics of γH2AX positivity in the
samples shown in B are expressed as a line graph. Bold line indicates
FL-HSC, and broken line indicates mBM. (D) Percentage of apoptotic cells
in the samples shown in B.
(A) Dose-dependence of γH2AX positivity in fetal liver
hematopoietic stem cells (FL-HSCs), analyzed 4 h after IP injection of
etoposide at the indicated doses. Etoposide was IP injected into E13.5
pregnant mice. (B) DNA double-strand breaks were detected according to
γH2AX positivity, and cell-cycle distribution was monitored by
propidium iodide (PI) incorporation. Etoposide (10 mg/kg) was IP
injected into E13.5 pregnant mice, and samples were analyzed at the
indicated time points. A two-dimensional dot blot is shown. FL-HSC:
fetal liver hematopoietic stem cells; mBM: maternal bone marrow mono
nuclear cells. (C) The kinetics of γH2AX positivity in the
samples shown in B are expressed as a line graph. Bold line indicates
FL-HSC, and broken line indicates mBM. (D) Percentage of apoptotic cells
in the samples shown in B.
Alteration of the cell cycle following etoposide injection
The cell cycle is finely regulated by the DNA damage checkpoint. The proportion
of S phase cells was higher in FL-HSCs from pregnant mice on day 13.5 than in
the maternal BM MNC, indicating that cell-cycle progression occurred at a faster
rate in the FL-HSC than in the BM MNC (Fig 3A and 3D). To investigate this further,
cell-cycle kinetics were assessed following IP injection of 10 mg/kg etoposide
into pregnant mice on day 13.5. TOP2 is essential for DNA decatenation and
enables cell-cycle progression from S to M phase; etoposide, a TOP2 inhibitor,
blocks cell-cycle progression from G2 to M phase. The proportion of mitotic
cells, as indicated by phospho-histone H3 positivity, was transiently reduced at
0.5–4 h after etoposide injection in both FL-HSC and maternal BM MNC
(Fig 3A and 3B). In
parallel, G2 phase cells gradually accumulated in both tissues (Fig 3C). Concomitant with the
transient M phase arrest, the number of S phase cells transiently increased at 3
h after injection, followed by a gradual decrease. This phenomenon was more
pronounced in FL-HSCs than in the maternal BM MNC (Fig 3D). After a temporary G1 arrest, the proportion
of G1 phase cells was transiently reduced in the FL-HSC. Maternal BM MNCs did
not show obvious changes, indicating that the G1 arrest was persistent in this
tissue (Fig 3E). To examine
the distribution of DNA damage in response to etoposide exposure, γH2AX
positivity was monitored in each cell-cycle phase. γH2AX-positive cells
were detected between the S and G2/M phases, and were more abundant in FL-HSCs
than in the maternal BM MNCs(Fig
4). Although most DNA damage in cells between the S and G2 phases was
resolved by 8 h after injection, 2.4% of FL-HSCs in G1 had DNA breaks, whereas
only 0.3% of maternal BM cells in G1 phase were γH2AX-positive. This
observation suggests that the DNA damage that occurred between the S and G2/M
phases was carried over to the next G1 phase.
Fig 3
(A) Cell-cycle distribution was monitored by a combination of
phospho-histone H3 positivity and PI incorporation. Etoposide (10 mg/kg)
was IP injected into E13.5 pregnant mice, and samples were analyzed at
the indicated time points. A two-dimensional dot blot is shown. (B)
Kinetics of phospho-histone H3 positivity indicating M phase percent,
shown as a line graph. Bold line indicates FL-HSC, and broken line
indicates mBM. (C) G2/M phase cell percent, (D) S phase cell percent,
and (E) G0/G1 phase cell percent.
Fig 4
DNA double-strand breaks in FL-HSCs at each phase of the cell
cycle.
DNA double-strand breaks were monitored by γH2AX positivity. DMSO
or etoposide (10 mg/kg) was IP injected into E13.5 mice, and samples
were analyzed at the indicated time points. White bar indicates the DMSO
injected group. Black bar indicates the etoposide injected group.
(A) Cell-cycle distribution was monitored by a combination of
phospho-histone H3 positivity and PI incorporation. Etoposide (10 mg/kg)
was IP injected into E13.5 pregnant mice, and samples were analyzed at
the indicated time points. A two-dimensional dot blot is shown. (B)
Kinetics of phospho-histone H3 positivity indicating M phase percent,
shown as a line graph. Bold line indicates FL-HSC, and broken line
indicates mBM. (C) G2/M phase cell percent, (D) S phase cell percent,
and (E) G0/G1 phase cell percent.
DNA double-strand breaks in FL-HSCs at each phase of the cell
cycle.
DNA double-strand breaks were monitored by γH2AX positivity. DMSO
or etoposide (10 mg/kg) was IP injected into E13.5 mice, and samples
were analyzed at the indicated time points. White bar indicates the DMSO
injected group. Black bar indicates the etoposide injected group.
KMT2A breakage induced by etoposide
Etoposide causes KMT2A rearrangement [18]. Southern blotting is a
traditional method for detecting such rearrangements. However, Southern blotting
has several limitations, including low sensitivity and a requirement for large
amounts of DNA. Therefore, a new method is needed for detecting breaks in
KMT2A. Because the ChIP assay is a relatively sensitive
method for the detection of changes in chromatin, we used this technique to
detect DNA breaks in the KMT2A locus. γH2AX was used as
an indicator of DNA breaks. In vitro experiments were first
performed to compare the traditional and novel methods; specifically,
KMT2A rearrangement in BV173 cells was measured by both
Southern blotting and ChIP assay. KMT2A translocations
associated with infant and therapy-related leukemia can be mapped to an 8.3 kb
breakpoint cluster region between exons 8 and 11; the probe used to detect
KMT2A rearrangements by Southern blotting was an 8 kb
BamHI fragment spanning nearly that entire region (S2A Fig).
Rearranged KMT2A was faintly detectable by Southern blotting at
5 h after 1 μM etoposide treatment, whereas it was more prominent after
injection of 10 μM etoposide (Fig 5A). ChIP to detect γH2AX on
KMT2A was performed using four sets of primers: one in
exons 9 and two in the vicinity of exon 11. A primer was also designed as a
negative control for KMT2A breakage at a neighbor gene,
BCL9L, which is located 400 kb from the
KMT2A gene (S2A Fig). γH2AX-positive DNA
damaged regions were detected using the exon 9 and vicinity of exon 11 primers,
which are located within the breakpoint cluster region (Fig 5B), but were not detected
with the primers for BCL9L. Next, we investigated whether this
ChIP assay could detect breaks in Kmt2a in mouseBa/F3 cells
in vitro. For these experiments, we designed primers
against Kmt2a (S2B Fig). As same as in human,
γH2AX-positive DNA damaged regions were detected in
Kmt2a gene (Fig 5C). Next, cells were treated with various concentrations of
etoposide, and the ChIP assay was performed. DNA breaks were detected at
etoposide concentrations of 0.5 μM and higher (Fig 5D). Finally, we
investigated DNA breaks in vivo in FL-HSCs from pregnant female
mice on day 13.5. The ChIP assay detected DNA breaks in Kmt2a
in FL-HSCs following IP injection of 0.5 mg/kg etoposide into pregnant mice
(Fig 5E).
Fig 5
DNA damage at the KMT2A gene region after etoposide
treatment.
(A) Southern blot analysis of human KMT2A breakage.
Cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of etoposide for 5
h. ETO: etoposide. (B) ChIP analysis of DNA breaks in human
KMT2A. Cells were treated with 10 μM
etoposide for 5 h. (C) ChIP analysis of DNA breaks in mouse
Kmt2a. (D) Dose-dependent generation of DNA breaks
in mouse cells, analyzed by ChIP. Cells were treated with the indicated
concentrations of etoposide for 3 h. (F) ChIP analysis of DNA breaks in
the fetal mouse Kmt2a locus. Pregnant mice were IP
injected with 0.5 mg/kg etoposide and analyzed 1 h after injection.
DNA damage at the KMT2A gene region after etoposide
treatment.
(A) Southern blot analysis of humanKMT2A breakage.
Cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of etoposide for 5
h. ETO: etoposide. (B) ChIP analysis of DNA breaks in humanKMT2A. Cells were treated with 10 μM
etoposide for 5 h. (C) ChIP analysis of DNA breaks in mouseKmt2a. (D) Dose-dependent generation of DNA breaks
in mouse cells, analyzed by ChIP. Cells were treated with the indicated
concentrations of etoposide for 3 h. (F) ChIP analysis of DNA breaks in
the fetal mouseKmt2a locus. Pregnant mice were IP
injected with 0.5 mg/kg etoposide and analyzed 1 h after injection.
In vivo fetal response to etoposide
Based on these observations, we postulated that 0.5 mg/kg etoposide is the
minimal concentration required to induce DNA damage in the
Kmt2a region. We then attempted to detect
Kmt2a breakage after etoposide administration. MouseKmt2a is located on chromosome 9. Therefore, chromosome
painting was performed. After maternal etoposide exposure between days 13.5 and
15.5 of pregnancy, FL-HSCs from day 16.5 of pregnancy were examined, which
showed no chromosomal aberrations (0/88). We hypothesized that FISH analysis was
not sensitive enough. To precisely evaluate the in vivo effect
of low-dose maternal etoposide exposure on the fetus, we performed RNA-seq to
detect fusion genes and alterations in mRNA expression patterns. After maternal
etoposide exposure between days 13.5 and 15.5 of pregnancy, various chimeric
mRNAs were detected in FL-HSCs from day 16.5 of pregnancy (S1 Data and
Fig 6A). However,
chimeric fusion mRNAs involving Kmt2a were not detected.
Fig 6
E13.5 pregnant wild-type mice were IP injected with saline or
etoposide (0.5 mg/kg) on 3 consecutive days, and FL-HSCs were harvested
for expression analysis 24 h after the final injection (E16.5).
(A) Number of chimeric mRNAs detected by RNA-seq in
Atm
-/- mice and wild-type littermates.
Numbers in parenthesis indicate in-frame fusion mRNAs. (B) Heat map of
selected genes associated with signal transduction, enriched using the
DAVID software. Cont. DMSO; treated, ETO; etoposide-treated. Red
indicates upregulated and green indicates downregulated expression in
color ramp for heatmap
E13.5 pregnant wild-type mice were IP injected with saline or
etoposide (0.5 mg/kg) on 3 consecutive days, and FL-HSCs were harvested
for expression analysis 24 h after the final injection (E16.5).
(A) Number of chimeric mRNAs detected by RNA-seq in
Atm
-/- mice and wild-type littermates.
Numbers in parenthesis indicate in-frame fusion mRNAs. (B) Heat map of
selected genes associated with signal transduction, enriched using the
DAVID software. Cont. DMSO; treated, ETO; etoposide-treated. Red
indicates upregulated and green indicates downregulated expression in
color ramp for heatmapDNA breaks and etoposide treatment itself alter gene expression patterns [19]. Hence, we compared the
in vivo gene expression profiles of control and
etoposide-exposed wild-type FL-HSCs. Several genes were up- or downregulated
after etoposide exposure. Pathway analysis of these genes identified 21
upregulated and four downregulated pathways (Fig 6B and S2 Data). Several pathways that
accelerate cell proliferation, including the MAPK, WNT, JAK-STAT, SHH and NOTCH
pathways, were upregulated after etoposide exposure.
Cell-cycle dysregulation after DNA damage causes Kmt2a
rearrangement
Kmt2a rearrangement after etoposide treatment was not observed
in wild-type mice. Our previous in vitro study demonstrated
that ATM-deficient fibroblasts, which cannot activate the early G2/M checkpoint,
induce KMT2A rearrangement following low-dose etoposide
exposure [14]. Hence, we
investigated the effect of etoposide on Atm-deficient FL-HSC, which showed that
Atm-deficient FL-HSCs contained elevated levels of chromosome and chromatid
breaks following etoposide exposure (Fig 7A and 7B). We also performed RNA-seq, as
described in the previous section, on FL-HSCs. Various chimeric fusion mRNAs
were detected in wild-type and Atm-knockout FL-HSCs in response
to etoposide treatment (Fig
6A and S1 Data). Chimeric fusion mRNAs
were more abundant in the FL-HSCs of Atm-deficient fetuses than in their
wild-type littermates. Intriguingly, a
Kmt2a-Ptp4a2 fusion mRNA was detected in
Atm-deficient FL-HSCs following etoposide exposure (Fig 7C). However, this
chimeric mRNA was not an in-frame gene fusion. Well described fusion mRNAs in
infant leukemia such as KMT2A-AFF1 (MLL-AF4), KMT2A-MLLT3 (MLL-AF9) and
KMT2A-MLLT1 (MLL-ENL) were not observed in this study. In the absence of DNA
damage repair, persistent DNA damage leads to chromosomal rearrangement.
Therefore, γH2AX positivity in FL-HSC was analyzed after 24 h of maternal
exposure to 10 mg/kg etoposide. However, γH2AX positivity was almost
resolved in wild-type and Atm-knockout FL-HSCs (S3
Fig).
Fig 7
FL-HSCs of Atm-knockout mice were pulse-treated with
etoposide for 4 h in vitro; metaphase spreads were
generated 24 h after pulse treatment.
(A) Representative metaphase spreads. Arrows indicate chromosomal or
chromatid breaks. (B) Number of chromosomal breaks and chromatid breaks,
shown as a table. (C) Sequence electropherogram of
Kmt2a-Ptp4a2 fusion mRNA.
FL-HSCs of Atm-knockout mice were pulse-treated with
etoposide for 4 h in vitro; metaphase spreads were
generated 24 h after pulse treatment.
(A) Representative metaphase spreads. Arrows indicate chromosomal or
chromatid breaks. (B) Number of chromosomal breaks and chromatid breaks,
shown as a table. (C) Sequence electropherogram of
Kmt2a-Ptp4a2 fusion mRNA.
Increased leukemia development was not observed after in
utero etoposide exposure
The effect of low-dose etoposide treatment on pup delivery and leukemia
development in the offspring was investigated next.
Atmmice were crossed
with each other, and 0.5 mg/kg etoposide or DMSO was administered for 3 days
starting on day 13.5 of pregnancy. The number of delivered pups and the
frequency of stillbirths did not differ between the DMSO-treated and
etoposide-treated groups. A cross of Atm
+/- mice is
expected to produce offspring with the Atm
+/+,
Atm
+/- and Atm
-/-
genotypes. The frequency of Atm
+/+,
Atm
+/- and Atm
-/-
pups did not differ between the DMSO-treated and etoposide-treated groups (S4A Fig).
Leukemia development in the offspring was expected, especially in
Atm
-/- mice, as
Atm
-/- mice develop leukemia/lymphoma
spontaneously [20]. In
the DMSO-treated group, two of eight Atm
-/- mice
developed T cell lymphoma. In the etoposide-treated group, three of nine
Atm
-/- mice developed T cell lymphoma (S4B Fig).
The frequency of leukemia development did not differ between the two groups.
Leukemia development was not observed in Atm
+/+ or
Atm
+/- mice. These observations indicated that
maternal etoposide exposure did not induce leukemia development, even in the
Atm
-/--knockout condition. In the two
Atm
-/- mice that developed tumors after
in utero etoposide exposure, the tumors were positive for
chromosome 9 translocation, where Kmt2a is located. However,
these translocations did not involve Kmt2a translocation (S5
Fig).
Discussion
Infant acute leukemia is the human diseases that are initiated during embryogenesis
or fetal development. Epidemiological studies suggest that the development of infantleukemia is associated with in utero exposure to TOP2 inhibitors,
which results in the rearrangement of KMT2A [21-23]. In utero
modifications of both the primary DNA sequence and the epigenetic state are involved
in this chromosomal translocation. However, because the access to fetuses is
limited, these phenomena cannot be studied in human embryos. Therefore, we performed
an in vivo analysis using mouse models with or without Atm
deficiency to determine whether maternal exposure to a TOP2 inhibitor induces
Kmt2a rearrangement under certain conditions. In the present
study, we also developed a novel method for detecting breaks in
KMT2A using the ChIP assay.TOP2A, which is mainly expressed between the S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle, is
essential for cell-cycle progression. The TOP2 inhibitor etoposide blocks cell-cycle
progression from G2 to M phase and induces cell death. Therefore, it is speculated
that cycling cells are more sensitive to etoposide. Previously, we hypothesized that
cord blood-derived MNCs would be more sensitive to TOP2 inhibitors than adult
peripheral MNCs, and that this hypersensitivity to etoposide is related to the
development of infant leukemia. However, sensitivity to etoposide did not differ
significantly between cord blood-derived MNCs and peripheral MNCs from children
[24]. In the current
study, we show that the hematopoietic cells of the fetal liver, the primary organ of
fetal hematopoiesis, are more sensitive than BM cells to TOP2 inhibitors. This is
likely because most fetal liver hematopoietic cells are actively cycling, whereas
cord blood MNCs are in G0/G1 phase. Furthermore, our previous results may have been
influenced by the artificial in vitro conditions used in that
study. The kinetics of cell-cycle changes and γH2AX are different between
FL-HSCs and the maternal BM MNCs. γH2AX positivity in G2/M was more prominent
in FL-HSCs at 4 h after etoposide injection. This could be attributed to the amount
of damaged DNA in G2 phase that is carried over from S phase, or explained by
impaired DNA repair during S phase in FL-HSCs.In the present study, DNA breaks were detected in vivo using flow
cytometry, and the ChIP assay was used to detect γH2AX at the
KMT2A locus. Southern blotting and FISH analysis are the
standard techniques for monitoring KMT2A rearrangements in humans;
to date, however, no practical method has been established in a mouse model. Here,
we described a ChIP assay that can detect DNA breaks in the
KMT2A/Kmt2a region with high sensitivity. We
used this method to reproduce in vivo KMT2A rearrangement following
etoposide treatment. Previous reports revealed that fetal hematopoietic cell or stem
cell exposed to relatively low dose etoposide (0.2 to 0.5μM) induces DNA
damage and KMT2A translocation [25] [26]. These
results are compatible with our data. Intriguingly Bueno et al. reported continuous
exposure of extremely low dose etoposide (0.04μM) followed by 0.2μM
initial exposure also induces KMT2A translocation [26]. Although several lines of evidence suggest that
KMT2A breakage occurs in response to exposure to TOP2
inhibitors in utero, reproducing Kmt2a
translocation in vivo has not been attempted to date. Cleaved DNA
ends are usually repaired by the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous
recombination repair (HRR) pathway. Especially in the case of etoposide-induced
lesions, DNA breaks are mostly generated between the late S and G2/M phases (Fig 4), when breaks are primarily
repaired by HRR. To achieve chromosomal translocations, it seems necessary to
introduce additional factors, such as dysregulation of cell-cycle checkpoints or
defects in DNA repair pathways, in addition to DNA double-strand breaks. In previous
work, we showed that chromosomal translocations involving KMT2A
occur in ATM-deficient cells following etoposide treatment [14]; in addition, such cells
induce chromosomal translocations involving the T cell receptor locus via
RAG-dependent VDJ rearrangement during thymocyte maturation [27]. Furthermore, ATM regulates
the G2/M transition as well as the HRR pathway. Therefore, loss of cell-cycle
regulation or defects in the DNA damage response (due to loss or mutation of DNA
damage response factors such as ATM, its target genes, or related molecules) may
trigger chromosomal translocations following DNA double-strand breaks. ATM-defective
cell lines are hypersensitive to etoposide and this is due to high levels of TOP2A
expression [28]. Thus,
ATM-dependent regulation of TOP2A might be another factor that influences etoposide
sensitivity. In addition, dysfunction of ATM plays an important role in the
development of infant leukemia in certain cases [29]. Taken together with these findings, our results
suggest that increased sensitivity to TOP2 inhibitors caused by mutations or defects
of ATM pathways leads to KMT2A rearrangement, ultimately resulting
in the development of infant leukemia.The development of leukemia requires activation of cell proliferation in addition to
differentiation blockage. Etoposide exposure stimulates FL-HSC proliferation [12]. In the present study, we
analyzed gene expression profiles after etoposide treatment. Pathways involved in
cell proliferation, such as MAPK and JAK-STAT, were upregulated. This phenomenon may
be explained by the process of regeneration of damaged cells tor tissues. If cells
retain DNA damage because of defects in the DNA damage response pathway, such as ATM
deficiency, activation of proliferative pathways would enable the cells to
proliferate despite the persistence of DNA breakage or rearrangements.Consistent with this, we detected the Kmt2a-Ptp4a2 fusion mRNA
following in utero etoposide exposure only in
Atm-knockout fetuses by using a highly sensitive method (RNA-seq).
The Kmt2a-Ptp4a2 fusion mRNA has not been described previously.
Ptp4a2 is a member of the family of protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs), which
function as cell signaling molecules, and may play a role in hematopoietic renewal
[30]. Although this could
be a bystander translocation in this case, it still indicates that changes of
chromosomal translocations can be generated.Our results showed that exposure to a TOP2 inhibitor per se is not
sufficient for rearrangement of KMT2A in vivo in a wild-type animal
model. Genetic background, such as mutations in the DNA damage response pathway, may
influence the likelihood of KMT2A rearrangement. However
KMT2A-rearranged leukemia development was not observed even in
Atm
-/- mice.
Kmt2a-AF4 knock-in mice develop leukemia after
prolonged latency, suggesting that a second hit, which might be induced by a
possibly defective DNA damage response, is required for full leukemogenesis [31]. Our data also suggested
that Kmt2a breakage itself is not sufficient for the full
development of infantile leukemia, even if the DNA damage response is defective.
Infant leukemia has one of the lowest frequencies of somatic mutations of any
sequenced cancer [32].
Activating mutation of genes associated with cellular proliferation such as RAS
mutations has been identified as an one of these mutations. A defective DNA damage
response might be involved in KMT2A rearrangement. However,
activation of cellular proliferation by mutation of other genes associated with
cellular proliferation as well as KMT2A rearrangement might be
necessary for the full development of leukemia. Taken together, these findings
suggest that the identification of other factors in addition to
KMT2A rearrangement is necessary to improve our understanding
of the mechanisms underlying the development of infant leukemia.
Fusion genes detected by RNA seq.
(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.
Pathway analysis results.
(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.
Supporting data for Fig
1.
(PDF)Click here for additional data file.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
Western blot analysis of γH2AX positivity 24 hr after etoposide
treatment.
(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
in vivo effect of etoposide for mice delivery and pups survival.
Authors: F E Alexander; S L Patheal; A Biondi; S Brandalise; M E Cabrera; L C Chan; Z Chen; G Cimino; J C Cordoba; L J Gu; H Hussein; E Ishii; A M Kamel; S Labra; I Q Magalhães; S Mizutani; E Petridou; M P de Oliveira; P Yuen; J L Wiemels; M F Greaves Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2001-03-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Virginia C Rodriguez-Cortez; Maria Pilar Navarrete-Meneses; Oscar Molina; Talia Velasco-Hernandez; Jessica Gonzalez; Paola Romecin; Francisco Gutierrez-Aguera; Heleia Roca-Ho; Meritxell Vinyoles; Eric Kowarz; Pedro Marin; Sandra Rodriguez-Perales; Carlos Gomez-Marin; Patricia Perez-Vera; Felipe Cortes-Ledesma; Anna Bigas; Andrea Terron; Clara Bueno; Pablo Menendez Journal: Haematologica Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Julio Castaño; Ana B Herrero; Aldeheid Bursen; Federico González; Rolf Marschalek; Norma C Gutiérrez; Pablo Menendez Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-05-24