Akane Sueki1, Kazuyuki Matsuda2, Akemi Yamaguchi3, Masayuki Uehara3, Mitsutoshi Sugano1, Takeshi Uehara1, Takayuki Honda1. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan. 2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan. Electronic address: kmatsuda@shinshu-u.ac.jp. 3. Core Technology Development Center, Seiko Epson Corporation, Suwa, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immunochromatographic antigen tests have been widely used for detection of influenza virus; however its low sensitivity restricts the use of clinical materials other than nasopharyngeal swabs. Saliva is obtained non-invasively and has utility for diagnosis of influenza. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is not typically used for rapid testing because it is time consuming. We evaluated the utility of saliva as diagnostic materials for influenza virus infection by PCR-based assays. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva were simultaneously collected from 144 patients and investigated by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and droplet-RT-PCR. RESULTS: Overall concordance of results from nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva were 95.8%. Influenza gene was detectable in less than 12min in saliva by the droplet-RT-PCR. Saliva as well as nasopharyngeal swabs contained more than 1×10(2) copies/μl of the influenza gene. About half of the patients provided positive results in nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva within 24h from the onset of the symptoms. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that saliva can be used as an alternative specimen source to nasopharyngeal swabs. When rapid PCR assay including RNA extraction to be full-automation in a miniaturized machine, point-of-care test based on PCR may be realized using saliva without restriction of materials.
BACKGROUND: Immunochromatographic antigen tests have been widely used for detection of influenza virus; however its low sensitivity restricts the use of clinical materials other than nasopharyngeal swabs. Saliva is obtained non-invasively and has utility for diagnosis of influenza. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is not typically used for rapid testing because it is time consuming. We evaluated the utility of saliva as diagnostic materials for influenza virus infection by PCR-based assays. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva were simultaneously collected from 144 patients and investigated by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and droplet-RT-PCR. RESULTS: Overall concordance of results from nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva were 95.8%. Influenza gene was detectable in less than 12min in saliva by the droplet-RT-PCR. Saliva as well as nasopharyngeal swabs contained more than 1×10(2) copies/μl of the influenza gene. About half of the patients provided positive results in nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva within 24h from the onset of the symptoms. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that saliva can be used as an alternative specimen source to nasopharyngeal swabs. When rapid PCR assay including RNA extraction to be full-automation in a miniaturized machine, point-of-care test based on PCR may be realized using saliva without restriction of materials.
Authors: Kelvin Kw To; Lu Lu; Cyril Cy Yip; Rosana Ws Poon; Ami My Fung; Andrew Cheng; Daniel Hk Lui; Deborah Ty Ho; Ivan Fn Hung; Kwok-Hung Chan; Kwok-Yung Yuen Journal: Emerg Microbes Infect Date: 2017-06-07 Impact factor: 7.163