Literature DB >> 26655591

Intradiscal pressure measurements: A challenge or a routine?

Maxim Bashkuev1, Pieter-Paul A Vergroesen2, Marcel Dreischarf1, Christoph Schilling3, Albert J van der Veen2, Hendrik Schmidt4, Idsart Kingma5.   

Abstract

Intradiscal pressure (IDP) is an essential biomechanical parameter and has been the subject of numerous in vivo and in vitro investigations. Although currently available sensors differ in size and measurement principles, no data exist regarding inter-sensor reliability in measuring IDP. Moreover, although discs of various species vary significantly in size and mechanics, the possible effects of sensor insertion on the IDP have never been investigated. The present in vitro study aimed to address these issues. The synchronized signals of two differently sized pressure transducers (Ø1.33 and Ø0.36 mm) obtained during the measurements in two species (bovine and caprine) and their influence on the measured pressure were compared. First, the discs were subjected to three loading periods, and the pressure was measured simultaneously to assess the inter-sensor reliability. In the second test, the effect of the sensor size was evaluated by alternatingly inserting one transducer into the disc while recording the resulting pressure change with the second transducer. Although both sensors yielded similar pressure values (ICC: consistency: 0.964-0.999; absolute agreement: 0.845-0.996) when used simultaneously, the sensor size was determined to influence the measured pressure during the insertion tests. The magnitude of the effect differed between species; it was insignificant in the bovine specimens but significant in the caprine specimens, with a pressure increase of 0.31-0.64 MPa (median: 0.43 MPa) obtained when the larger sensor was inserted. The results suggest that sensor selection for IDP measurements requires special attention and can be crucial for species with smaller disc sizes.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In vitro; Intervertebral disc; Intradiscal pressure measurement; Pressure transducers

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26655591     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  3 in total

1.  Robotic Replica of a Human Spine Uses Soft Magnetic Sensor Array to Forecast Intervertebral Loads and Posture after Surgery.

Authors:  Maohua Lin; Moaed A Abd; Alex Taing; Chi-Tay Tsai; Frank D Vrionis; Erik D Engeberg
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 2.  In Vitro Studies for Investigating Creep of Intervertebral Discs under Axial Compression: A Review of Testing Environment and Results.

Authors:  Mengying Yang; Dingding Xiang; Song Wang; Weiqiang Liu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  In vivo measurement of intradiscal pressure changes related to thrust and non-thrust spinal manipulation in an animal model: a pilot study.

Authors:  William R Reed; Michael A K Liebschner; Carla R Lima; Harshvardhan Singh; Christopher P Hurt; Daniel F Martins; James M Cox; Maruti R Gudavalli
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2022-09-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.