William B Acker1, Bruce L Tai, Barry Belmont, Albert J Shih, Todd A Irwin, James R Holmes. 1. *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI;†Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX;‡Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Residents in training are often directed to insert screws using "two-finger tightness" to impart adequate torque but minimize the chance of a screw stripping in bone. This study seeks to quantify and describe two-finger tightness and to assess the variability of its application by residents in training. METHODS: Cortical bone was simulated using a polyurethane foam block (30-pcf density) that was prepared with predrilled holes for tightening 3.5 × 14-mm long cortical screws and mounted to a custom-built apparatus on a load cell to capture torque data. Thirty-three residents in training, ranging from the first through fifth years of residency, along with 8 staff members, were directed to tighten 6 screws to two-finger tightness in the test block, and peak torque values were recorded. The participants were blinded to their torque values. RESULTS: Stripping torque (2.73 ± 0.56 N·m) was determined from 36 trials and served as a threshold for failed screw placement. The average torques varied substantially with regard to absolute torque values, thus poorly defining two-finger tightness. Junior residents less consistently reproduced torque compared with other groups (0.29 and 0.32, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data quantify absolute values of two-finger tightness but demonstrate considerable variability in absolute torque values, percentage of stripping torque, and ability to consistently reproduce given torque levels. Increased years in training are weakly correlated with reproducibility, but experience does not seem to affect absolute torque levels. These results question the usefulness of two-finger tightness as a teaching tool and highlight the need for improvement in resident motor skill training and development within a teaching curriculum. Torque measuring devices may be a useful simulation tools for this purpose.
OBJECTIVES: Residents in training are often directed to insert screws using "two-finger tightness" to impart adequate torque but minimize the chance of a screw stripping in bone. This study seeks to quantify and describe two-finger tightness and to assess the variability of its application by residents in training. METHODS: Cortical bone was simulated using a polyurethane foam block (30-pcf density) that was prepared with predrilled holes for tightening 3.5 × 14-mm long cortical screws and mounted to a custom-built apparatus on a load cell to capture torque data. Thirty-three residents in training, ranging from the first through fifth years of residency, along with 8 staff members, were directed to tighten 6 screws to two-finger tightness in the test block, and peak torque values were recorded. The participants were blinded to their torque values. RESULTS: Stripping torque (2.73 ± 0.56 N·m) was determined from 36 trials and served as a threshold for failed screw placement. The average torques varied substantially with regard to absolute torque values, thus poorly defining two-finger tightness. Junior residents less consistently reproduced torque compared with other groups (0.29 and 0.32, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data quantify absolute values of two-finger tightness but demonstrate considerable variability in absolute torque values, percentage of stripping torque, and ability to consistently reproduce given torque levels. Increased years in training are weakly correlated with reproducibility, but experience does not seem to affect absolute torque levels. These results question the usefulness of two-finger tightness as a teaching tool and highlight the need for improvement in resident motor skill training and development within a teaching curriculum. Torque measuring devices may be a useful simulation tools for this purpose.
Authors: James W A Fletcher; Verena Neumann; Lisa Wenzel; Boyko Gueorguiev; R Geoff Richards; Harinderjit S Gill; Michael R Whitehouse; Ezio Preatoni Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2021-10-26 Impact factor: 2.359
Authors: Caitlin R Moreno; Elizabeth M Santschi; Jennifer Janes; Jie Liu; Do-Gyoon Kim; Alan S Litsky Journal: Vet Surg Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 1.618
Authors: Barzi Gareb; Valerie D M van Munster; Pieter U Dijkstra; Ruud R M Bos; Arjan Vissink; Nico B van Bakelen; Baucke van Minnen Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-08-24 Impact factor: 4.996