Literature DB >> 26654785

Protein-lipid interactions and non-lamellar lipidic structures in membrane pore formation and membrane fusion.

Robert J C Gilbert1.   

Abstract

Pore-forming proteins and peptides act on their targeted lipid bilayer membranes to increase permeability. This approach to the modulation of biological function is relevant to a great number of living processes, including; infection, parasitism, immunity, apoptosis, development and neurodegeneration. While some pore-forming proteins/peptides assemble into rings of subunits to generate discrete, well-defined pore-forming structures, an increasing number is recognised to form pores via mechanisms which co-opt membrane lipids themselves. Among these, membrane attack complex-perforin/cholesterol-dependent cytolysin (MACPF/CDC) family proteins, Bax/colicin family proteins and actinoporins are especially prominent and among the mechanisms believed to apply are the formation of non-lamellar (semi-toroidal or toroidal) lipidic structures. In this review I focus on the ways in which lipids contribute to pore formation and contrast this with the ways in which lipids are co-opted also in membrane fusion and fission events. A variety of mechanisms for pore formation that involve lipids exists, but they consistently result in stable hybrid proteolipidic structures. These structures are stabilised by mechanisms in which pore-forming proteins modify the innate capacity of lipid membranes to respond to their environment, changing shape and/or phase and binding individual lipid molecules directly. In contrast, and despite the diversity in fusion protein types, mechanisms for membrane fusion are rather similar to each other, mapping out a pathway from pairs of separated compartments to fully confluent fused membranes. Fusion proteins generate metastable structures along the way which, like long-lived proteolipidic pore-forming complexes, rely on the basic physical properties of lipid bilayers. Membrane fission involves similar intermediates, in the reverse order. I conclude by considering the possibility that at least some pore-forming and fusion proteins are evolutionarily related homologues. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Pore-Forming Toxins edited by Mauro Dalla Serra and Franco Gambale.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Membrane fission; Membrane fusion; Membrane pore formation; Molecular evolution; Non-lamellar (toroidal) lipids

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26654785     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.11.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  22 in total

Review 1.  Assembly mechanism of the α-pore-forming toxin cytolysin A from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Daniel Roderer; Rudi Glockshuber
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Pore formation by dimeric Bak and Bax: an unusual pore?

Authors:  Rachel T Uren; Sweta Iyer; Ruth M Kluck
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Disrupting a key hydrophobic pair in the oligomerization interface of the actinoporins impairs their pore-forming activity.

Authors:  Haydeé Mesa-Galloso; Karelia H Delgado-Magnero; Sheila Cabezas; Aracelys López-Castilla; Jorge E Hernández-González; Lohans Pedrera; Carlos Alvarez; D Peter Tieleman; Ana J García-Sáez; Maria E Lanio; Uris Ros; Pedro A Valiente
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Phospholipase A activity of adenylate cyclase toxin mediates translocation of its adenylate cyclase domain.

Authors:  David González-Bullón; Kepa B Uribe; César Martín; Helena Ostolaza
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Membrane Remodeling by the Lytic Fragment of SticholysinII: Implications for the Toroidal Pore Model.

Authors:  Haydee Mesa-Galloso; Pedro A Valiente; Mario E Valdés-Tresanco; Raquel F Epand; Maria E Lanio; Richard M Epand; Carlos Alvarez; D Peter Tieleman; Uris Ros
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Ceramide-C16 Is a Versatile Modulator of Phosphatidylethanolamine Polymorphism.

Authors:  Mahmoudreza Doroudgar; Michel Lafleur
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Peptide-Induced Lipid Flip-Flop in Asymmetric Liposomes Measured by Small Angle Neutron Scattering.

Authors:  Michael H L Nguyen; Mitchell DiPasquale; Brett W Rickeard; Milka Doktorova; Frederick A Heberle; Haden L Scott; Francisco N Barrera; Graham Taylor; Charles P Collier; Christopher B Stanley; John Katsaras; Drew Marquardt
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.882

Review 8.  Membrane Dynamics and Remodelling in Response to the Action of the Membrane-Damaging Pore-Forming Toxins.

Authors:  Kusum Lata; Mahendra Singh; Shamaita Chatterjee; Kausik Chattopadhyay
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 1.843

Review 9.  Biophysical and biochemical strategies to understand membrane binding and pore formation by sticholysins, pore-forming proteins from a sea anemone.

Authors:  Carlos Alvarez; Uris Ros; Aisel Valle; Lohans Pedrera; Carmen Soto; Yadira P Hervis; Sheila Cabezas; Pedro A Valiente; Fabiola Pazos; Maria E Lanio
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2017-08-29

10.  Protein acylation by saturated very long chain fatty acids and endocytosis are involved in necroptosis.

Authors:  Apoorva J Pradhan; Daniel Lu; Laura R Parisi; Shichen Shen; Ilyas A Berhane; Samuel L Galster; Kiana Bynum; Viviana Monje-Galvan; Omer Gokcumen; Sherry R Chemler; Jun Qu; Jason G Kay; G Ekin Atilla-Gokcumen
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 9.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.