Michael Montalto1, Man Yee Chu2, Irani Ratnam3, Tim Spelman3, Karin Thursky4. 1. Hospital in the Home, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC michael.montalto@mh.org.au. 2. Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, China. 3. Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Melbourne, VIC. 4. NHMRC National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Guidance, Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes for patients with nursing home-acquired pneumonia (NHAP) treated completely in a Hospital in the Home (HITH) setting with those of patients treated in a traditional hospital ward. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: All patients admitted by the Royal Melbourne Hospital for treatment of NHAP from 1 July 2013 to 31 January 2014. INTERVENTION: Admission to the Royal Melbourne Hospital HITH Unit within 48 hours of presentation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of stay, in-hospital and 30-day mortality, hospital readmissions (30-day), complications and unplanned returns to hospital. RESULTS: Sixty HITH patients and 54 hospital (control) patients were identified. Thirty-two patients (53%) were admitted directly to HITH without any hospital or emergency stay, 25 (42%) were referred directly from the emergency department. HITH patients were more likely to be male, older and dehydrated, and less likely to have an advanced care directive or to have had non-invasive ventilation. There were no significant differences in CURB-65 or CORB scores between the two patient groups; similar proportions were given intravenous fluids or supplemental oxygen. There were no adjusted differences in median length of stay between HITH and control patients (-1.00 days; 95% CI, -2.72 to 0.72; P = 0.252) or in overall mortality at 30 days (HITH v control patients: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.97; 95% CI, 0.67-5.73). Inpatient mortality was lower for HITH patients (aOR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05-0.75) but unadjusted postdischarge 30-day mortality was higher (OR, 13.25; 95% CI 1.67-105.75). There were no differences between the two groups with regard to complications (falls and pressure wounds) and 30-day readmission rates (aOR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.30-8.53). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that HITH may be an effective and safe alternative to hospital treatment for residents of aged care facilities presenting with NHAP.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes for patients with nursing home-acquired pneumonia (NHAP) treated completely in a Hospital in the Home (HITH) setting with those of patients treated in a traditional hospital ward. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: All patients admitted by the Royal Melbourne Hospital for treatment of NHAP from 1 July 2013 to 31 January 2014. INTERVENTION: Admission to the Royal Melbourne Hospital HITH Unit within 48 hours of presentation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of stay, in-hospital and 30-day mortality, hospital readmissions (30-day), complications and unplanned returns to hospital. RESULTS: Sixty HITH patients and 54 hospital (control) patients were identified. Thirty-two patients (53%) were admitted directly to HITH without any hospital or emergency stay, 25 (42%) were referred directly from the emergency department. HITH patients were more likely to be male, older and dehydrated, and less likely to have an advanced care directive or to have had non-invasive ventilation. There were no significant differences in CURB-65 or CORB scores between the two patient groups; similar proportions were given intravenous fluids or supplemental oxygen. There were no adjusted differences in median length of stay between HITH and control patients (-1.00 days; 95% CI, -2.72 to 0.72; P = 0.252) or in overall mortality at 30 days (HITH v control patients: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.97; 95% CI, 0.67-5.73). Inpatient mortality was lower for HITH patients (aOR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05-0.75) but unadjusted postdischarge 30-day mortality was higher (OR, 13.25; 95% CI 1.67-105.75). There were no differences between the two groups with regard to complications (falls and pressure wounds) and 30-day readmission rates (aOR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.30-8.53). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that HITH may be an effective and safe alternative to hospital treatment for residents of aged care facilities presenting with NHAP.
Authors: Christine E Mc Carthy; Tracy Keating; Vinny Ramiah; Dermot Power; Joseph Duggan; Chie Wei Fan Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2020-05-29 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Janet K Sluggett; Samanta Lalic; Sarah M Hosking; Brett Ritchie; Jennifer McLoughlin; Terry Shortt; Leonie Robson; Tina Cooper; Kelly A Cairns; Jenni Ilomäki; Renuka Visvanathan; J Simon Bell Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 3.390