Elizabeth A Gonzalez1, Poulomi Nandy2, Anne D Lucas2, Victoria M Hitchins2. 1. Division of Biology, Chemistry, and Material Sciences, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD. Electronic address: Elizabeth.gonzalez@fda.hhs.gov. 2. Division of Biology, Chemistry, and Material Sciences, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nosocomial infections are a serious problem in health care facilities. Bacteria can be transferred from patient to patient via contaminated reusable medical devices and equipment. METHODS: An anesthesia machine and objects representative of smooth and ridged machine knobs were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus atrophaeus spores, and Clostridium sporogenes spores. The ability of 5 commercially available cleaning-disinfecting wipes to remove bacteria was compared with gauze soaked with water or bleach. Gauze soaked with water was used to determine the optimal wetness for bacteria removal, which was then used to evaluate the efficacy of the wipe ingredients. RESULTS: All of the wipes cleaned the device surfaces significantly better than the no wipe control. Some wipes performed equally well as gauze with water, whereas others performed worse. Overall, the wipe containing sodium hypochlorite was the most effective at removing bacteria. When the wipe ingredients were re-evaluated using the determined optimal wipe wetness on gauze, their effectiveness at cleaning S aureus, but not spores, significantly improved. CONCLUSION: Physically removing bacteria from device surfaces with water was often as effective as the cleaning-disinfecting wipes. Of the wipe active ingredients evaluated, sodium hypochlorite was the most effective overall. The wetness of the wipes may also play a role in their effectiveness. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND:Nosocomial infections are a serious problem in health care facilities. Bacteria can be transferred from patient to patient via contaminated reusable medical devices and equipment. METHODS: An anesthesia machine and objects representative of smooth and ridged machine knobs were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus atrophaeus spores, and Clostridium sporogenes spores. The ability of 5 commercially available cleaning-disinfecting wipes to remove bacteria was compared with gauze soaked with water or bleach. Gauze soaked with water was used to determine the optimal wetness for bacteria removal, which was then used to evaluate the efficacy of the wipe ingredients. RESULTS: All of the wipes cleaned the device surfaces significantly better than the no wipe control. Some wipes performed equally well as gauze with water, whereas others performed worse. Overall, the wipe containing sodium hypochlorite was the most effective at removing bacteria. When the wipe ingredients were re-evaluated using the determined optimal wipe wetness on gauze, their effectiveness at cleaning S aureus, but not spores, significantly improved. CONCLUSION: Physically removing bacteria from device surfaces with water was often as effective as the cleaning-disinfecting wipes. Of the wipe active ingredients evaluated, sodium hypochlorite was the most effective overall. The wetness of the wipes may also play a role in their effectiveness. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cleaning; Disinfection; Nosocomial infection; Reusable medical devices
Authors: Samantha Velazquez; Willem Griffiths; Leslie Dietz; Patrick Horve; Susie Nunez; Jinglin Hu; Jiaxian Shen; Mark Fretz; Chenyang Bi; Ying Xu; Kevin G Van Den Wymelenberg; Erica M Hartmann; Suzanne L Ishaq Journal: Indoor Air Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 5.770
Authors: Alyssa M West; Carine A Nkemngong; Maxwell G Voorn; Tongyu Wu; Xiaobao Li; Peter J Teska; Haley F Oliver Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 4.887
Authors: Carine A Nkemngong; Gurpreet K Chaggar; Xiaobao Li; Peter J Teska; Haley F Oliver Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 4.887