Literature DB >> 26654120

Impact of error self-perception of aerobic capacity in the safety and efficacy of the lifeguards.

Jose A Prieto1, Paloma Nistal1, David Méndez1, Cristian Abelairas-Gomez2, Roberto Barcala-Furelos2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The strong physical demands that are required of lifeguards during rescues also require an accurate self-perception of one's fitness level to be able to regulate the intensity of effort.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the real aerobic capacity (RAC) and to compare it with two self-reported measurements: subjective appraisal of aerobic capacity (SAAC) and appraisal of physical exercise (APE).
METHODS: Fifty-two professional lifeguards were included in the study. For an objective assessment of RAC, the lifeguards' maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) values were measured during treadmill stress tests. A fitness assessment questionnaire was used to obtain the SAAC and APE values.
RESULTS: We found a statistically significant association between the APE and RAC variables in the contingency analysis (p < 0.001). In total, 93.7% of the lifeguards who obtained a VO2max value below 43 ml kg(-1) min(-1) considered their aerobic capacity to be high or very high.
CONCLUSION: This self-perception error of true aerobic capacity could lead to premature fatigue during a rescue, endangering both the lifeguard's life and the life of the victim. These data may help lifeguards and beach managers to become aware of the need to know lifeguards' true physical conditions through testing and structured training programs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aerobic capacity; lifeguards; safety of beaches; self-perception of physical fitness

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26654120     DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1117352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Occup Saf Ergon        ISSN: 1080-3548


  3 in total

1.  How is rating of perceived capacity related to VO2max and what is VO2max at onset of training?

Authors:  Christina Gjestvang; Trine Stensrud; Lene A H Haakstad
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2017-07-06

2.  Is Low-Frequency Electrical Stimulation a Tool for Recovery after a Water Rescue? A Cross-Over Study with Lifeguards.

Authors:  Roberto Barcala-Furelos; Alicia González-Represas; Ezequiel Rey; Alicia Martínez-Rodríguez; Anton Kalén; Olga Marques; Luís Rama
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Relationship between the Performance in a Maximum Effort Test for Lifeguards and the Time Spent in a Water Rescue.

Authors:  Sergio López-García; Brais Ruibal-Lista; José Palacios-Aguilar; Miguel Santiago-Alonso; José Antonio Prieto
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.