Literature DB >> 26654087

Utility of the clue - From assessing the investigative contribution of forensic science to supporting the decision to use traces.

Sonja Bitzer1, Nicola Albertini2, Eric Lock3, Olivier Ribaux4, Olivier Delémont4.   

Abstract

In an attempt to grasp the effectiveness of forensic science in the criminal justice process, a number of studies introduced some form of performance indicator. However, most of these indicators suffer from different weaknesses, from the definition of forensic science itself to problems of reliability and validity. We suggest the introduction of the concept of utility of the clue as an internal evaluation indicator of forensic science in the investigation. Utility of the clue is defined as added value of information, gained by the use of traces. This concept could be used to assess the contribution of the trace in the context of the case. By extension, a second application of this concept is suggested. By formalising and considering, a priori, the perceived utility of using traces, we introduce the notion of expected utility that could be used as decision factor when choosing which traces to use, once they have been collected at the crime scene or from an object in the laboratory. In a case-based approach, utility can be assessed in the light of the available information to evaluate the investigative contribution of forensic science. In the decision-making process, the projection or estimation of the utility of the clue is proposed to be a factor to take into account when triaging the set of traces.
Copyright © 2015 The Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Effectiveness; Forensic science; Impact; Investigation; Utility

Year:  2015        PMID: 26654087     DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2015.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Justice        ISSN: 1355-0306            Impact factor:   2.124


  1 in total

1.  Benchmarking forensic volume crime performance in Australia between 2011 and 2015.

Authors:  Eva Bruenisholz; Nicholas Vandenberg; Cheryl Brown; Linzi Wilson-Wilde
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2019-05-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.