Literature DB >> 26653982

Role of ATM in bystander signaling between human monocytes and lung adenocarcinoma cells.

Somnath Ghosh1, Anu Ghosh2, Malini Krishna2.   

Abstract

The response of a cell or tissue to ionizing radiation is mediated by direct damage to cellular components and indirect damage mediated by radiolysis of water. Radiation affects both irradiated cells and the surrounding cells and tissues. The radiation-induced bystander effect is defined by the presence of biological effects in cells that were not themselves in the field of irradiation. To establish the contribution of the bystander effect in the survival of the neighboring cells, lung carcinoma A549 cells were exposed to gamma-irradiation, 2Gy. The medium from the irradiated cells was transferred to non-irradiated A549 cells. Irradiated A549 cells as well as non-irradiated A549 cells cultured in the presence of medium from irradiated cells showed decrease in survival and increase in γ-H2AX and p-ATM foci, indicating a bystander effect. Bystander signaling was also observed between different cell types. Phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA)-stimulated and gamma-irradiated U937 (human monocyte) cells induced a bystander response in non-irradiated A549 (lung carcinoma) cells as shown by decreased survival and increased γ-H2AX and p-ATM foci. Non-stimulated and/or irradiated U937 cells did not induce such effects in non-irradiated A549 cells. Since ATM protein was activated in irradiated cells as well as bystander cells, it was of interest to understand its role in bystander effect. Suppression of ATM with siRNA in A549 cells completely inhibited bystander effect in bystander A549 cells. On the other hand suppression of ATM with siRNA in PMA stimulated U937 cells caused only a partial inhibition of bystander effect in bystander A549 cells. These results indicate that apart from ATM, some additional factor may be involved in bystander effect between different cell types.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATM; Bystander effect; DNA damage response; H2AX

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26653982     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2015.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen        ISSN: 1383-5718            Impact factor:   2.873


  3 in total

Review 1.  Targeted and Off-Target (Bystander and Abscopal) Effects of Radiation Therapy: Redox Mechanisms and Risk/Benefit Analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Pouget; Alexandros G Georgakilas; Jean-Luc Ravanat
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 8.401

2.  Coupling of cell fate selection model enhances DNA damage response and may underlie BE phenomenon.

Authors:  Gökhan Demirkıran; Güleser Kalaycı Demir; Cüneyt Güzeliş
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.615

3.  Microvesicles Contribute to the Bystander Effect of DNA Damage.

Authors:  Xiaozeng Lin; Fengxiang Wei; Pierre Major; Khalid Al-Nedawi; Hassan A Al Saleh; Damu Tang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.