Literature DB >> 26653869

Sex Differences in Aortic Stenosis and Outcome Following Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Laura E Dobson1, Timothy A Fairbairn1, Sven Plein1, John P Greenwood1.   

Abstract

Aortic stenosis is the commonest valve defect in the developed world and is associated with a high mortality once symptomatic. There is a difference in the way that male and female hearts remodel in the face of chronic pressure overload: women develop a concentrically hypertrophied, small cavity left ventricle (LV), whereas men are more prone to the development of eccentric hypertrophy. At a cellular level, there is an increase in collagen and metalloproteinase gene expression in males suggesting a different regulation of extracellular volume composition according to sex. Male hearts with aortic stenosis appear to have more fibrosis than their female comparators. The trigger for this appears to be in part related to estrogen receptor signaling, but other factors such as renin-angiotensin activation, nitric oxide, and circulating noradrenaline levels may also be implicated. Treatment options include surgical valve replacement (SAVR) and more recently transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Female sex may be a risk factor for adverse outcome following SAVR and conversely appears to confer a survival advantage when undergoing TAVR. Whether the lower mortality seen following TAVR in women compared with men (despite their increased age and frailty) reflects their longer life expectancy, smaller annular size (and less post-TAVR aortic regurgitation), more favorable LV reverse remodeling, or more likely, a combination of these factors remains to be established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26653869     DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2014.5158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  6 in total

Review 1.  The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the assessment of severe aortic stenosis and in post-procedural evaluation following transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Tarique Al Musa; Sven Plein; John P Greenwood
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-06

2.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacements alter circulating serum factors to mediate myofibroblast deactivation.

Authors:  Brian A Aguado; Katherine B Schuetze; Joseph C Grim; Cierra J Walker; Anne C Cox; Tova L Ceccato; Aik-Choon Tan; Carmen C Sucharov; Leslie A Leinwand; Matthew R G Taylor; Timothy A McKinsey; Kristi S Anseth
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 19.319

3.  Impact of chronic kidney disease on long-term outcome of patients with valvular heart defects.

Authors:  Łukasz Kuźma; Jolanta Małyszko; Hanna Bachórzewska-Gajewska; Marta Maria Niwińska; Anna Kurasz; Małgorzata Zalewska-Adamiec; Marcin Kożuch; Sławomir Dobrzycki
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Impact of Sex on Mortality in Patients Undergoing Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Hyun-Uk Kang; Jae-Sik Nam; Dongho Kim; Kyungmi Kim; Ji-Hyun Chin; In-Cheol Choi
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-07-24

5.  Role of endothelial CXCR4 in the development of aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  Anna Winnicki; James Gadd; Vahagn Ohanyan; Gilbert Hernandez; Yang Wang; Molly Enrick; Hannah McKillen; Matthew Kiedrowski; Dipan Kundu; Karlina Kegecik; Marc Penn; William M Chilian; Liya Yin; Feng Dong
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-06

6.  Ascending aortic estrogen receptor positivity and aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  Ari Mennander; Nitta-Nea Valtonen; Eetu Niinimäki; Ivana Kholová; Timo Paavonen
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.596

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.