| Literature DB >> 26652177 |
Laia Tolosa1,2,3,4, Jérôme Caron5,6,7, Zara Hannoun8,9,10, Marc Antoni11,12,13, Silvia López14, Deborah Burks15, Jose Vicente Castell16,17, Anne Weber18,19,20, Maria-Jose Gomez-Lechon21,22, Anne Dubart-Kupperschmitt23,24,25.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hepatic cell therapy has become a viable alternative to liver transplantation for life-threatening liver diseases. However, the supply of human hepatocytes is limited due to the shortage of suitable donor organs required to isolate high-quality cells. Human pluripotent stem cells reflect a potential renewable source for generating functional hepatocytes. However, most differentiation protocols use undefined matrices or factors of animal origin; as such, the resulting hepatocytes are not Good Manufacturing Practice compliant. Moreover, the preclinical studies employed to assess safety and function of human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived hepatocytes are generally limited to immunodeficient mice. In the present study, we evaluate the generation of hepatocytes under defined conditions using a European hESC line (VAL9) which was derived under animal-free conditions. The function capacity of VAL9-derived hepatocytes was assessed by transplantation into mice with acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure, a clinically relevant model.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26652177 PMCID: PMC4676869 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-015-0227-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther ISSN: 1757-6512 Impact factor: 6.832
Fig. 1Differentiation of VAL9 hESCs into hepatic progenitors. a Stages of differentiation and phase contrast microscopy images showing corresponding cell morphology. b Representative images of immunofluorescence from definitive endoderm. Cells express GATA binding protein (GATA)4, SOX17, hepatic nuclear factor (HNF)3β and are negative for human octamer-binding transcription factor (OCT)4 and homeobox transcription factor (NANOG), two markers characteristic of undifferentiated cells. c Representative fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of VAL9 at endoderm stage where 98.4 % cells were CXCR4-positive. d Representative immunofluorescence of hepatic progenitors. Cells express GATA4, HNF4α, HNF6, HNF3β, cytokeratin (CK)19 and AFP. e Representative FACS analysis of VAL9 at hepatic progenitor stage where 97 % cells were epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM)-positive.
Fig. 3Differentiation of VAL9-hepatoblasts into hepatocytes. a Protocol and phase contrast images of hepatocyte differentiation. Hepatic progenitors were passaged at day 11 on collagen 1-coated wells and grown for 2 days in HamF12/Williams (HPM), 20 ng/ml hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), then for 2 days in HPM, 20 ng/ml HGF and 20 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF). From day 16 to day 18 of differentiation cells were grown in a mixture of HPM/hepatocyte culture medium (HCM), HGF 10 ng/ml and oncostatin 10 ng/ml. Hepatocytes were generated after 10–12 additional days in HCM, 10 ng/ml HGF. b Hepatic morphology of VAL9-HEP during the differentiation protocol (11 to 30 days). c Representative field of immunostaining of VAL9-HEP. Cells express hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF)Aα, alpha-1-antitrypsin (A1AT), albumin (ALB; red) and HNF3β (green), ALB (red) and cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), alpha foetoprotein (AFP), claudin (CLDN1), scavenger receptor class B member 1 (SRB1) and cluster of differentiation (CD)81. d Representative fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of VAL9-HEP showing 85 % of asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGR) a marker specific for differentiated hepatocytes. e Quantitative RT-PCR analysis at days 0, 4, 11 and 30 of differentiation. Data are represented as the percentage of expression in VAL9-HEP. f Representative transcript levels of hepatic cell markers on days 5, 11 and 25 of differentiation
Fig. 2Differentiation of hepatoblasts into precursors of cholangiocytes. a Protocol and phase contrast images of cholangiocyte precursors. Hepatic progenitors were passaged at day 11 onto collagen 1-coated wells and grown for 2 days in HamF12/Williams (HPM), 20 ng/ml HGF, then for 2 days in HPM, 20 ng/ml HGF and 20 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF). From day 16 to day 18 of differentiation cells were grown in a mixture of HPM/HCM. b Representative field of immunostaining of cholangiocyte precursor cells. Cells express osteopontin (OPN), hepatic nuclear factor (HNF1) 1β , cytokeratin (CK)7, CK18, cystic fibrosis transmembrane receptor (CFTR) and are negative for HNF4α, a hepatocyte transcription factor. c Representative phase contrast image (×40) of cysts obtained 1 week after seeding in matrigel at day 18 of differentiation (left panel). Immunostaining of cyst (middle panel) and tubule (right panel) showing the polarity of the cells in these structures. GH Growth hormone, IL Interleukin, TGF Transforming growth factor
Fig. 4Functional characterization of VAL9-HEP in vitro at day 30 of differentiation. a Glycogen storage was assessed by PAS staining. Cells were incubated with insulin 10−7 M (INS) or INS 10−7 M + glucagon 10−6 M (GLC). b Cells were examined for uptake and excretion of ICG. c Differentiation of VAL9 hESCs was assessed by flow cytometry after transduction with lentivectors expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the control of apolipoprotein A-II (APOAII) and cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) promoters or EF1α promoter in control vectors. d Ureagenesis was assessed by measuring the formation of urea from NH4+ after incubation of the cells for 24 hours in the presence of NH4CL and by comparison to neonate hepatocytes. e UDP glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) activity was assessed by incubating VAL9-HEP with 15 μM β-estradiol for 24 hours and by comparison to neonate hepatocytes. f Western blot analysis showing expression of uridine 5’-diphospho-(UDP) glucuronosyltransferase 1 family, polypeptide A1 (UGT1A1) in VAL9-HEP and in neonatal hepatocytes (NH) using β-actin as loading control. g Human (h)ALB secreted to the media by VAL9-HEP after 20 and 30 days of differentiation. hALB was determined in the culture medium by ELISA. h CYP activity levels in VAL9-HEP were determined in cells exposed to 25 μM rifampicin and were compared to the control cells. Cells were incubated for 24 hours with a cocktail of specific substrates as previously described [55]. Activity values are expressed as pmol of the corresponding metabolite formed per minute and per million cells
Fig. 5VAL9- HEP can rescue acetaminophen (APAP)-induced acute liver failure (ALF). a Representative images of transduced VAL9-HEP (phase-contrast and fluorescence) for green fluorescent protein (GFP). b Flow cytometry analysis of GFP expression from transduced VAL9-HEP 2 days after transduction with A1AT-GFP lentivector. The numbers indicate the percentages of GFP-positive cells in the analyzed gate. c Representative histopathology of livers of control, acetaminophen-treated mice and acetaminophen-treated mice after transplantation with VAL9-HEP. d Survival curves of immunodeficient mice (n = 10 in each group) that received intrasplenic cell transplantation with 1.0 × 106 VAL9-derived hepatocytes. e Secreted ALB in the serum of transplanted animals at different time points. f Liver function test after infusion of acetaminophen then saline or VAL9-HEP at different time points. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 versus control; # p < 0.05 versus APAP-treated mice. ALT Alanine aminotransferase, AST Aspartate aminotransferase
Fig. 6Engraftment of VAL9-HEP in the liver parenchyma of transplanted acetaminophen-treated mice. a Visualization of engrafted cells 30 days post-transplantation using immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect green fluorescent protein (GFP). The clusters confirm proliferation of engrafted cells. b Representative IHC staining on serial sections showing co-expression of GFP and albumin (ALB). c Representative IHC staining on serial sections demonstrating downregulation of alpha foetoprotein (AFP). d Representative IHC staining on serial sections showing co-expression of GFP and alpha-1-anti-trypsin (A1AT)