Chenfei Rao1, Heng Zhang2, Huawei Gao2, Yan Zhao1, Xin Yuan2, Kun Hua1, Shengshou Hu2, Zhe Zheng3. 1. National Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China. 2. National Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China. 3. National Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: zhengzhe@fuwai.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In light of the burgeoning volume and certain variation of in-hospital outcomes of cardiac operations in China, a large patient-level registry was needed. We generated the Chinese Cardiac Surgery Registry (CCSR) database in 2013 to benchmark, continuously monitor, and provide feedback of the quality of adult cardiac operations. We report on the design of this database and provide an overview of participating sites and quality of data. METHODS: We established a network of participating sites with an adult cardiac surgery volume of more than 100 operations per year for continuous web-based registry of in-hospital and follow-up data of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valve operations. After a routine data quality audit, we report the performance and quality of care back to the participating sites. RESULTS: In total, 87 centers participated and submitted 46,303 surgical procedures from January 2013 to December 2014. The timeliness rates of the short-list and in-hospital data submitted were 73.6% and 70.2%, respectively. The completeness and accuracy rates of the in-hospital data were 97.6% and 95.1%, respectively. We have provided 2 reports for each site and 1 national report regarding the performance of isolated CABG and valve operations. CONCLUSIONS: The newly launched CCSR with a national representativeness network and good data quality has the potential to act as an important platform for monitoring and improving cardiac surgical care in mainland China, as well as facilitating research projects, establishing benchmarking standards, and identifying potential areas for quality improvements (ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT02400125).
BACKGROUND: In light of the burgeoning volume and certain variation of in-hospital outcomes of cardiac operations in China, a large patient-level registry was needed. We generated the Chinese Cardiac Surgery Registry (CCSR) database in 2013 to benchmark, continuously monitor, and provide feedback of the quality of adult cardiac operations. We report on the design of this database and provide an overview of participating sites and quality of data. METHODS: We established a network of participating sites with an adult cardiac surgery volume of more than 100 operations per year for continuous web-based registry of in-hospital and follow-up data of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valve operations. After a routine data quality audit, we report the performance and quality of care back to the participating sites. RESULTS: In total, 87 centers participated and submitted 46,303 surgical procedures from January 2013 to December 2014. The timeliness rates of the short-list and in-hospital data submitted were 73.6% and 70.2%, respectively. The completeness and accuracy rates of the in-hospital data were 97.6% and 95.1%, respectively. We have provided 2 reports for each site and 1 national report regarding the performance of isolated CABG and valve operations. CONCLUSIONS: The newly launched CCSR with a national representativeness network and good data quality has the potential to act as an important platform for monitoring and improving cardiac surgical care in mainland China, as well as facilitating research projects, establishing benchmarking standards, and identifying potential areas for quality improvements (ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT02400125).
Authors: Stuart W Grant; Simon Kendall; Andrew T Goodwin; Graham Cooper; Uday Trivedi; Richard Page; David P Jenkins Journal: JTCVS Open Date: 2021-02-12