Literature DB >> 26651522

Bone-tissue engineering: complex tunable structural and biological responses to injury, drug delivery, and cell-based therapies.

Karrer M Alghazali1, Zeid A Nima1, Rabab N Hamzah1, Madhu S Dhar2, David E Anderson2, Alexandru S Biris1.   

Abstract

Bone loss and failure of proper bone healing continues to be a significant medical condition in need of solutions that can be implemented successfully both in human and veterinary medicine. This is particularly true when large segmental defects are present, the bone has failed to return to normal form or function, or the healing process is extremely prolonged. Given the inherent complexity of bone tissue - its unique structural, mechanical, and compositional properties, as well as its ability to support various cells - it is difficult to find ideal candidate materials that could be used as the foundation for tissue regeneration from technological platforms. Recently, important developments have been made in the implementation of complex structures built both at the macro- and the nano-level that have been shown to positively impact bone formation and to have the ability to deliver active biological molecules (drugs, growth factors, proteins, cells) for controlled tissue regeneration and the prevention of infection. These materials are diverse, ranging from polymers to ceramics and various composites. This review presents developments in this area with a focus on the role of scaffold structure and chemistry on the biologic processes that influence bone physiology and regeneration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone regeneration; bio-chemical agents delivery; bioactive scaffolds; biomaterials; bone structure; drug therapeutics; stem cell biology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26651522     DOI: 10.3109/03602532.2015.1115871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Metab Rev        ISSN: 0360-2532            Impact factor:   4.518


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of a bone filler scaffold for local antibiotic delivery to prevent Staphylococcus aureus infection in a contaminated bone defect.

Authors:  Karen E Beenken; Mara J Campbell; Aura M Ramirez; Karrar Alghazali; Christopher M Walker; Bailey Jackson; Christopher Griffin; William King; Shawn E Bourdo; Rebecca Rifkin; Silke Hecht; Daniel G Meeker; David E Anderson; Alexandru S Biris; Mark S Smeltzer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Cell sheets of co-cultured BMP-2-modified bone marrow stromal cells and endothelial progenitor cells accelerate bone regeneration in vitro.

Authors:  Jia He; Xuesong Han; Songmei Wang; Ying Zhang; Xiaoming Dai; Boyan Liu; Liu Liu; Xian Zhao
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  A Novel Cell Delivery System Exploiting Synergy between Fresh Titanium and Fibronectin.

Authors:  Makoto Hirota; Norio Hori; Yoshihiko Sugita; Takayuki Ikeda; Wonhee Park; Juri Saruta; Takahiro Ogawa
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 7.666

4.  Functionalized gold nanorod nanocomposite system to modulate differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into neural-like progenitors.

Authors:  Karrer M Alghazali; Steven D Newby; Zeid A Nima; Rabab N Hamzah; Fumiya Watanabe; Shawn E Bourdo; Thomas J Masi; Stacy M Stephenson; David E Anderson; Madhu S Dhar; Alexandru S Biris
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Network-Based Method for Identifying Co- Regeneration Genes in Bone, Dentin, Nerve and Vessel Tissues.

Authors:  Lei Chen; Hongying Pan; Yu-Hang Zhang; Kaiyan Feng; XiangYin Kong; Tao Huang; Yu-Dong Cai
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 4.096

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.