Matthew J Soeberg1, Kris Rogers2, David C Currow3, Jane M Young4. 1. Cancer Epidemiology and Services Research (CESR), Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: jane.young@sydney.edu.au. 2. Cancer Epidemiology and Services Research (CESR), Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia. 3. Cancer Institute NSW, Australia. 4. Cancer Epidemiology and Services Research (CESR), Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney Local Health District and University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the incidence and survival of anal cancer in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, as anal cancer cases are often grouped together with other colorectal cancers in descriptive epidemiological analyses. METHODS: We studied patterns and trends in the incidence and survival of people diagnosed with anal cancer in NSW, Australia, 1972-2009 (n=2724). We also predicted anal cancer incidence in NSW during 2010-2032. Given the human papilloma virus-associated aetiology for most anal cancers, we quantified these changes over time in incidence and survival by histological subtype: anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC); and anal adenocarcinoma (AAC). RESULTS: There was a linear increase in incident anal cancer cases in NSW with an average annual percentage change (AAPC) of 1.6 (95% CI 1.1-2.0) such that, in combination with age-period-cohort modelling, we predict there will be 198 cases of anal cancer in the 2032 calendar year (95% CI 169-236). Almost all of these anal cancer cases are projected to be ASCC (94%). Survival improved over time regardless of histological subtype. However, five-year relative survival was substantially higher for people with ASCC (70% (95% CI 66-74%)) compared to AAC (51% (95% CI 43-59%)), a 37% difference. Survival was also greater for women (69% (95% CI 64-73%)) with ASCC compared to men (55% (95% CI 50-60%)). It was not possible to estimate survival by stage at diagnosis particularly given that 8% of all cases were recorded as having distant stage and 22% had missing stage data. INTERPRETATION: Aetiological explanations, namely exposure to oncogenic types of human papillomavirus, along with demographic changes most likely explain the actual and projected increase in ASCC case numbers. Survival differences by gender and histological subtype point to areas where further research is warranted to improve treatment and outcomes for all anal cancer patients.
INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the incidence and survival of anal cancer in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, as anal cancer cases are often grouped together with other colorectal cancers in descriptive epidemiological analyses. METHODS: We studied patterns and trends in the incidence and survival of people diagnosed with anal cancer in NSW, Australia, 1972-2009 (n=2724). We also predicted anal cancer incidence in NSW during 2010-2032. Given the human papilloma virus-associated aetiology for most anal cancers, we quantified these changes over time in incidence and survival by histological subtype: anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC); and anal adenocarcinoma (AAC). RESULTS: There was a linear increase in incident anal cancer cases in NSW with an average annual percentage change (AAPC) of 1.6 (95% CI 1.1-2.0) such that, in combination with age-period-cohort modelling, we predict there will be 198 cases of anal cancer in the 2032 calendar year (95% CI 169-236). Almost all of these anal cancer cases are projected to be ASCC (94%). Survival improved over time regardless of histological subtype. However, five-year relative survival was substantially higher for people with ASCC (70% (95% CI 66-74%)) compared to AAC (51% (95% CI 43-59%)), a 37% difference. Survival was also greater for women (69% (95% CI 64-73%)) with ASCC compared to men (55% (95% CI 50-60%)). It was not possible to estimate survival by stage at diagnosis particularly given that 8% of all cases were recorded as having distant stage and 22% had missing stage data. INTERPRETATION: Aetiological explanations, namely exposure to oncogenic types of human papillomavirus, along with demographic changes most likely explain the actual and projected increase in ASCC case numbers. Survival differences by gender and histological subtype point to areas where further research is warranted to improve treatment and outcomes for all anal cancerpatients.
Authors: L Cattelan; F M Ghazawi; M Le; E Savin; A Zubarev; F Lagacé; D Sasseville; K Waschke; I V Litvinov Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Devarati Mitra; Nora K Horick; Diane G Brackett; Kent W Mouw; Jason L Hornick; Soldano Ferrone; Theodore S Hong; Harvey Mamon; Jeffrey W Clark; Aparna R Parikh; Jill N Allen; David P Ryan; David T Ting; Vikram Deshpande; Jennifer Y Wo Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-02-12