Literature DB >> 26651391

Identification of Distinct Psychosis Biotypes Using Brain-Based Biomarkers.

Brett A Clementz1, John A Sweeney1, Jordan P Hamm1, Elena I Ivleva1, Lauren E Ethridge1, Godfrey D Pearlson1, Matcheri S Keshavan1, Carol A Tamminga1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Clinical phenomenology remains the primary means for classifying psychoses despite considerable evidence that this method incompletely captures biologically meaningful differentiations. Rather than relying on clinical diagnoses as the gold standard, this project drew on neurobiological heterogeneity among psychosis cases to delineate subgroups independent of their phenomenological manifestations.
METHOD: A large biomarker panel (neuropsychological, stop signal, saccadic control, and auditory stimulation paradigms) characterizing diverse aspects of brain function was collected on individuals with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder with psychosis (N=711), their first-degree relatives (N=883), and demographically comparable healthy subjects (N=278). Biomarker variance across paradigms was exploited to create nine integrated variables that were used to capture neurobiological variance among the psychosis cases. Data on external validating measures (social functioning, structural magnetic resonance imaging, family biomarkers, and clinical information) were collected.
RESULTS: Multivariate taxometric analyses identified three neurobiologically distinct psychosis biotypes that did not respect clinical diagnosis boundaries. The same analysis procedure using clinical DSM diagnoses as the criteria was best described by a single severity continuum (schizophrenia worse than schizoaffective disorder worse than bipolar psychosis); this was not the case for biotypes. The external validating measures supported the distinctiveness of these subgroups compared with clinical diagnosis, highlighting a possible advantage of neurobiological versus clinical categorization schemes for differentiating psychotic disorders.
CONCLUSIONS: These data illustrate how multiple pathways may lead to clinically similar psychosis manifestations, and they provide explanations for the marked heterogeneity observed across laboratories on the same biomarker variables when DSM diagnoses are used as the gold standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26651391      PMCID: PMC5314432          DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.14091200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  46 in total

Review 1.  CNVs: harbingers of a rare variant revolution in psychiatric genetics.

Authors:  Dheeraj Malhotra; Jonathan Sebat
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  The family history method using diagnostic criteria. Reliability and validity.

Authors:  N C Andreasen; J Endicott; R L Spitzer; G Winokur
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1977-10

3.  Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in lung cancer: an overview and update.

Authors:  Gillian Bethune; Drew Bethune; Neale Ridgway; Zhaolin Xu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes.

Authors:  Roberto Romero; Sudhansu K Dey; Susan J Fisher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  A strategy for elucidating genetic influences on complex psychopathological syndromes (with special reference to ocular motor functioning and schizophrenia).

Authors:  W G Iacono; B A Clementz
Journal:  Prog Exp Pers Psychopathol Res       Date:  1993

Review 6.  Schizophrenia: a disconnection syndrome?

Authors:  K J Friston; C D Frith
Journal:  Clin Neurosci       Date:  1995

7.  Reduced attentional engagement contributes to deficits in prefrontal inhibitory control in schizophrenia.

Authors:  James L Reilly; Margret S H Harris; Tin T Khine; Matcheri S Keshavan; John A Sweeney
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Clinical phenotypes of psychosis in the Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes (B-SNIP).

Authors:  Carol A Tamminga; Elena I Ivleva; Matcheri S Keshavan; Godfrey D Pearlson; Brett A Clementz; Bradley Witte; David W Morris; Jeffrey Bishop; Gunvant K Thaker; John A Sweeney
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Is aberrant functional connectivity a psychosis endophenotype? A resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Sabin Khadka; Shashwath A Meda; Michael C Stevens; David C Glahn; Vince D Calhoun; John A Sweeney; Carol A Tamminga; Matcheri S Keshavan; Kasey O'Neil; David Schretlen; Godfrey D Pearlson
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  Gene co-expression network analysis reveals common system-level properties of prognostic genes across cancer types.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Leng Han; Yuan Yuan; Jun Li; Nainan Hei; Han Liang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  215 in total

1.  Brain Heterogeneity in Schizophrenia and Its Association With Polygenic Risk.

Authors:  Dag Alnæs; Tobias Kaufmann; Dennis van der Meer; Aldo Córdova-Palomera; Jaroslav Rokicki; Torgeir Moberget; Francesco Bettella; Ingrid Agartz; Deanna M Barch; Alessandro Bertolino; Christine L Brandt; Simon Cervenka; Srdjan Djurovic; Nhat Trung Doan; Sarah Eisenacher; Helena Fatouros-Bergman; Lena Flyckt; Annabella Di Giorgio; Beathe Haatveit; Erik G Jönsson; Peter Kirsch; Martina J Lund; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Giulio Pergola; Emanuel Schwarz; Olav B Smeland; Tiziana Quarto; Mathias Zink; Ole A Andreassen; Lars T Westlye
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 21.596

2.  Somatostatin Interneurons Control a Key Component of Mismatch Negativity in Mouse Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Jordan P Hamm; Rafael Yuste
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  The P1 visual-evoked potential, red light, and transdiagnostic psychiatric symptoms.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Bedwell; Christopher C Spencer; Chi C Chan; Pamela D Butler; Pejman Sehatpour; Joseph Schmidt
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Neurophysiological Correlate of Emotion Regulation by Cognitive Reappraisal and Its Association With Psychotic Symptoms in Early Psychosis.

Authors:  Minah Kim; Wu Jeong Hwang; Jihye Park; Taekwan Kim; Sanghoon Oh; Jun Soo Kwon
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  DCC Receptors Drive Prefrontal Cortex Maturation by Determining Dopamine Axon Targeting in Adolescence.

Authors:  Lauren M Reynolds; Matthew Pokinko; Angélica Torres-Berrío; Santiago Cuesta; Laura C Lambert; Esther Del Cid Pellitero; Michael Wodzinski; Colleen Manitt; Paul Krimpenfort; Bryan Kolb; Cecilia Flores
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  Phase-Amplitude Markers of Synchrony and Noise: A Resting-State and TMS-EEG Study of Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Dominik Freche; Jodie Naim-Feil; Shmuel Hess; Avraham Peled; Alexander Grinshpoon; Elisha Moses; Nava Levit-Binnun
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-05-04

7.  Nonsocial and social cognition in schizophrenia: current evidence and future directions.

Authors:  Michael F Green; William P Horan; Junghee Lee
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 49.548

8.  Data-Driven Phenotypic Categorization for Neurobiological Analyses: Beyond DSM-5 Labels.

Authors:  Nicholas T Van Dam; David O'Connor; Enitan T Marcelle; Erica J Ho; R Cameron Craddock; Russell H Tobe; Vilma Gabbay; James J Hudziak; F Xavier Castellanos; Bennett L Leventhal; Michael P Milham
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Dysbindin-1 contributes to prefrontal cortical dendritic arbor pathology in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Glenn T Konopaske; Darrick T Balu; Kendall T Presti; Grace Chan; Francine M Benes; Joseph T Coyle
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  P50 inhibitory sensory gating in schizophrenia: analysis of recent studies.

Authors:  Robert Freedman; Amanda M Olsen-Dufour; Ann Olincy
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.