Literature DB >> 2665103

Limited sensitivity of ultrasound for the detection of rotator cuff tears.

C L Miller1, D Karasick, A B Kurtz, J M Fenlin.   

Abstract

Bilateral rotator cuff sonography was performed on 56 patients referred for shoulder arthrography to detect rotator cuff tears. Since one patient had bilateral arthrography there were 57 arthrograms. Twenty-seven shoulders had rotator cuff tears shown on arthrography, 15 of which were detected by sonography. Eleven were false negative by sonography, and one was indeterminate. Of the 30 shoulders with negative arthrograms, 28 had normal sonograms and two were false positive. Sensitivity was 58%, specificity was 93% and overall accuracy was 77%. The positive and negative predictive values were 88% and 72%. These results suggest that sonography has limited value in screening patients for rotator cuff tears and that a positive sonographic reading is more reliable than a negative one. Theories relating to the variable anatomic configuration of a tear are postulated to explain these results, which differ from those previously reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2665103     DOI: 10.1007/bf00360964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  8 in total

1.  Pitfalls of rotator cuff sonography.

Authors:  W D Middleton; W R Reinus; G L Melson; W G Totty; W A Murphy
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of the rotator cuff and biceps tendon.

Authors:  W D Middleton; W R Reinus; W G Totty; C L Melson; W A Murphy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff. Normal and pathologic anatomy.

Authors:  C A Bretzke; J R Crass; E V Craig; S B Feinberg
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  US evaluation of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  L A Mack; F A Matsen; R F Kilcoyne; P K Davies; M E Sickler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The hyperextended internal rotation view in rotator cuff ultrasonography.

Authors:  J R Crass; E V Craig; S B Feinberg
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.910

6.  Sonographic detection of rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  W D Middleton; G Edelstein; W R Reinus; G L Melson; W G Totty; W A Murphy
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff: surgical correlation.

Authors:  J R Crass; E V Craig; R C Thompson; S B Feinberg
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 0.910

8.  Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  J R Crass; E V Craig; C Bretzke; S B Feinberg
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.333

  8 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Painful shoulder syndromes: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  D L Smith; S M Campbell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Dead men and radiologists don't lie: a review of cadaveric and radiological studies of rotator cuff tear prevalence.

Authors:  P Reilly; I Macleod; R Macfarlane; J Windley; R J H Emery
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Ultrasound and operative evaluation of arthritic shoulder joints.

Authors:  E Alasaarela; J Leppilahti; M Hakala
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 19.103

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.