Nicole O Burghardt1, Joan M Chow, Anna Steiner, Heidi M Bauer. 1. From the Sexually Transmitted Disease Control Branch (STDCB), Division of Communicable Disease Control (DCDC), Center for Infectious Disease (CID), California Department of Public Health (CDPH), Richmond, CA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Juvenile detention facilities house adolescents at high risk for sexually transmitted diseases. Collaboration between health departments and juvenile detention authorities can provide routine, cost-efficient chlamydia screening and treatment to females with limited access to care. We describe trends in screening, positivity, treatment, and associated costs in a well-established juvenile detention chlamydia screening program. METHODS: In the California Chlamydia Screening Project, juvenile detention facilities in 12 counties collected quarterly aggregate data on female census and line-listed chlamydia test results and treatment data from fiscal year (FY) 2003-2004 to FY 2013-2014. Trends in the proportion of females screened, positivity, and treatment by age, race/ethnicity, and facility volume were evaluated by Cochran-Armitage test. The median cost of the program per chlamydia positive identified was compared by facility in FY 2013-2014. RESULTS: Data from 59,518 test records among juvenile females indicated high screening rates (75.1%-79.4%). Chlamydia positivity, although consistently high, decreased from 14.8% in 2003-2004 to 11.5% in 2013-2014 (P < 0.001). Documented treatment decreased (88.8% in 2005-2006 to 79.0% in 2013-2014, P < 0.001); of those treated, treatment within 7 days increased (80.1% in 2005-2006 to 88.8% in 2013-2014, P < 0.001). The median cost per chlamydia positive identified was $708 (interquartile range, $669-$894) and was lowest for facilities with high chlamydia positivity. CONCLUSIONS: The California Chlamydia Screening Project demonstrated consistently high rates of chlamydia screening and positivity among adolescent females while keeping costs low for high-volume facilities. Further improvement in timely treatment rates remains a challenge for extending the impact of screening in this high-risk population.
BACKGROUND: Juvenile detention facilities house adolescents at high risk for sexually transmitted diseases. Collaboration between health departments and juvenile detention authorities can provide routine, cost-efficient chlamydia screening and treatment to females with limited access to care. We describe trends in screening, positivity, treatment, and associated costs in a well-established juvenile detention chlamydia screening program. METHODS: In the California Chlamydia Screening Project, juvenile detention facilities in 12 counties collected quarterly aggregate data on female census and line-listed chlamydia test results and treatment data from fiscal year (FY) 2003-2004 to FY 2013-2014. Trends in the proportion of females screened, positivity, and treatment by age, race/ethnicity, and facility volume were evaluated by Cochran-Armitage test. The median cost of the program per chlamydia positive identified was compared by facility in FY 2013-2014. RESULTS: Data from 59,518 test records among juvenile females indicated high screening rates (75.1%-79.4%). Chlamydia positivity, although consistently high, decreased from 14.8% in 2003-2004 to 11.5% in 2013-2014 (P < 0.001). Documented treatment decreased (88.8% in 2005-2006 to 79.0% in 2013-2014, P < 0.001); of those treated, treatment within 7 days increased (80.1% in 2005-2006 to 88.8% in 2013-2014, P < 0.001). The median cost per chlamydia positive identified was $708 (interquartile range, $669-$894) and was lowest for facilities with high chlamydia positivity. CONCLUSIONS: The California Chlamydia Screening Project demonstrated consistently high rates of chlamydia screening and positivity among adolescent females while keeping costs low for high-volume facilities. Further improvement in timely treatment rates remains a challenge for extending the impact of screening in this high-risk population.
Authors: Jill Diesel; Kristen Kreisel; Emily R Learner; Elizabeth Torrone; Thomas Peterman Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 3.868