| Literature DB >> 26650502 |
Anna Rapacz1, Sabina Rybka2, Jolanta Obniska2, Kinga Sałat3, Beata Powroźnik4, Elżbieta Pękala4, Barbara Filipek3.
Abstract
The aim of the present experiments was to examine anticonvulsant activity of new pyrrolidine-2,5-dione and 3-methylpyrrolidine-2,5-dione derivatives in animal models of epilepsy. In addition, the possible collateral antinociceptive activity was assessed. Anticonvulsant activity was investigated in the electroconvulsive threshold (MEST) test and the pilocarpine-induced seizure models in mice. Antinociceptive activity was examined in the hot plate and the formalin tests in mice. Considering the drug safety evaluation, the Vibrio harveyi test was used to estimate anti/mutagenic activity. To determine the plausible mechanism of anticonvulsant action, for two chosen compounds (12 and 23), in vitro binding assays were carried out. All of the tested compounds revealed significant anticonvulsant activity in the MEST test. Compounds 12 and 23 displayed anticonvulsant effect also in pilocarpine-induced seizures. Four of the tested compounds (12, 13, 15, and 24) revealed analgesic activity in the hot plate test as well as in the first phase of the formalin test, and all of them were active in the second phase of the formalin test. The possible mechanism of action of compounds 12 and 23 is the influence on the neuronal voltage-sensitive sodium and L-type calcium channels. The obtained results indicate that in the group of pyrrolidine-2,5-diones, new anticonvulsants with collateral analgesic properties can be found.Entities:
Keywords: Anticonvulsant; Antinociceptive; Ion channels binding; Lacosamide; Mutagenicity and antimutagenicity studies; Pyrrolidine-2,5-dione
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26650502 PMCID: PMC4749642 DOI: 10.1007/s00210-015-1194-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol ISSN: 0028-1298 Impact factor: 3.000
Scheme 1Schematic structure of the studied pyrrolidine-2,5-dione and 3-methylpyrrolidine-2,5-dione
Effect of the tested and reference compounds on the electroconvulsive threshold
| Cmpd | Dose (mg/kg) | CS50 (mA) (CI) | SE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vehicle | – | 6.53 (6.11–6.99) | 0.22 |
| 12 | 30 | 14.27 (8.21–24.80)** | 2.56 |
| 13 | 30 | 9.37 (5.47–16.07)* | 1.60 |
| 15 | 30 | 8.11 (7.12–9.24)*** | 0.43 |
| 23 | 30 | 10.53 (8.06–13.77)**** | 0.91 |
| 24 | 30 | 14.01 (9.05–21.70)*** | 2.24 |
| Vehicle | – | 5.27 (4.35–6.37) | 0.33 |
| 12 | 10 | 7.94 (6.57–9.57)*** | 0.50 |
| Vehicle | – | 6.61 (6.38–6.85) | 0.23 |
| 23 | 10 | 8.42 (7.55–9.39)** | 0.39 |
| 24 | 10 | 11.11 (8.12–15.20)*** | 1.27 |
| Lacosamide | 10 | >25 | – |
CI confidence interval, SE standard errors
Data analyzed by log-probit method according to Litchfield and Wilcoxon. Result presented as median current strengths (CS50) required to evoke tonic hind limb extension in 50 % of mice tested. The compounds were administered i.p. 4 h before the test. Lacosamide was administered i.p. 30 min, before the test
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 vs vehicle; N = 18–24
Anticonvulsant activity of the tested and reference compounds in pilocarpine-induced seizures model
| Cmpd | Dose | Latency to status epilepticus (s) ± SEM | Anticonvulsant effect (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vehicle | – | 342.6 ± 38.15 | – |
| 12 | 100 | 468.8 ± 39.60* | 36.8 |
| 13 | 100 | 296.7 ± 9.63 | – |
| 15 | 100 | 406.0 ± 59.77 | 18.5 |
| 23 | 30 | 465.8 ± 37.61 | 36.8 |
| 100 | 669.4 ± 73.04*** | 95.4 | |
| 24 | 100 | 346.7 ± 25.92 | 1.2 |
| Vehicle | 338.8 ± 37.85 | – | |
| Lacosamide | 30 | 382.1 ± 22.86 | 12.8 |
| 40a | 507.7 ± 52.11* | 49.8 |
Each value represents the mean ± SEM obtained from 6 to 8 mice. Anticonvulsant activity compared to vehicle-treated mice. Statistical analysis: Student’s t test (12, 13, 15, and 24) and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test (23 and lacosamide): F [2, 19] = 15.72, p < 0.001 (23); F [2, 18] = 4.995, p < 0.05 (lacosamide). The compounds were administered i.p. 4 h; lacosamide was administered i.p. 30 min before pilocarpine
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs vehicle; N = 6–8
aThe highest dose of lacosamide without neurotoxic effects in mice
Fig. 1Effects of compounds 12, 13, 15, 23, 24, and lacosamide at the dose of 30 mg/kg on response latency in the hot plate test in mice. Data are presented as mean ± SEM and were analyzed by Student t test. Significant difference compared to the vehicle-treated group—**p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001; N = 8–10
Fig. 2Effects of compounds 12, 13, 15, 23, 24, and lacosamide at the dose of 30 mg/kg on the duration of the licking response in a the early (neurogenic) phase (0–5 min) or b the late (inflammatory) phase (15–30 min) of the formalin test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM and were analyzed by Student t test. Significant difference compared to the vehicle-treated group: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001; N = 8–10
Fig. 3Effects of compounds 12, 13, 15, 23, 24, and lacosamide at the dose of 30 mg/kg on locomotor activity in mice. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of beam breaks recorded for 30 min (n = 6–10). Statistical analysis of the results was conducted using Student t test. Significant difference compared to the vehicle-treated group: **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001; N = 6–10
Mutagenicity and antimutagenicity of derivatives of the tested compounds in the Vibrio harveyi test
| Cmpd | Mutagenicity | Antimutagenicity | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BB7a | BB7XMa | BB7a | BB7XMa | |||||
| Mean ± SD | M.I.c | Mean ± SD | M.I.c | Mean ± SD | Inhib. (%)d | Mean ± SD | Inhib. (%)d | |
| DMSOb | 16 ± 3 | 12 ± 4 | 17 ± 2 | 15 ± 3 | ||||
| NQNOb | 32 ± 4 | 2.0 | 24 ± 3 | 2.1 | 38 ± 5 | 24 ± 4 | ||
| 12 | 25 ± 4 | 1.5 | 14 ± 6 | 1.2 | 28 ± 4 | (26) | 23 ± 5 | (5) |
| 13 | 22 ± 3 | 1.4 | 20 ± 5 | 1.7 | 25 ± 4 | (35) | 20 ± 4 | (16) |
| 23 | 19 ± 2 | 1.2 | 9 ± 3 | 0.7 | 32 ± 3 | (15) | 24 ± 2 | (1) |
| 24 | 25 ± 4 | 1.6 | 19 ± 1 | 1.6 | 31 ± 5 | (18) | 29 ± 3 | (0) |
aNumber of revertants; bNQNO (nitroquinoline-N-oxide, 40 ng/ml) was used as positive control; DMSO was used as negative control; cM.I. (mutagenic index): number of induced revertants/number of spontaneous revertants (positive assay when M.I. ≥ 2); dThe values in parenthesis are the inhibition rates (%) of mutagenicity; 25–40 % inhibition: moderate antigenotoxicity, 40 % or more inhibition: strong antigenotoxicity, 25 % or less inhibition: no antigenotoxicity
In vitro Na+ channel (site 2) binding assays
| Cmpd | Concentration (μM) | % inhibition of control specific binding |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | 10 | 49.1 |
| 100 | 85.8 | |
| 23 | 10 | 49.4 |
| 100 | 89.9 | |
| Phenytoina | 10 | 10.6 |
| 100 | 21.2 | |
| Carbamazepineb | 10 | 4.6 |
| 100 | 17.4 |
Compounds were each evaluated in preparations from rat cerebral cortex as inhibitors of the specific binding of [3H]batrachotoxin to the voltage-sensitive sodium channel. Results showing an inhibition higher than 50 % are considered to represent significant effects of the test compounds; results showing an inhibition between 25 and 50 % are indicative of moderate effect; results showing an inhibition lower than 25 % are not considered significant
aData from the previous study (Rybka et al. 2015)
bData from the previous study (Kamiński et al. 2015b)
In vitro L-type Ca+ (dihydropyridine site) channel binding assays
| Cmpd | Concentration (μM) | % inhibition of control specific binding |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | 10 | 20.2 |
| 100 | 59.4 | |
| 23 | 10 | 12.3 |
| 100 | 65.9 | |
| Phenytoin | 10 | 6.6 |
| 100 | 57.8 | |
| Topiramatea | 100 | 7.9 |
Compounds were each evaluated in preparations from rat cerebral cortex as inhibitors of the specific binding of [3H]nitrendipine to the L-type calcium channel. Results showing an inhibition higher than 50 % are considered to represent significant effects of the test compounds; results showing an inhibition between 25 % and 50 % are indicative of moderate effect; results showing an inhibition lower than 25 % are not considered significant
aData from the previous study (Kamiński et al. 2015b)