Literature DB >> 26650034

[Care preferences and spatial mobility : Factors influencing care-related willingness to move of elderly people in partnerships in a rural area].

Miriam Rudel1, Martin Abraham2, Edmund Görtler3.   

Abstract

The availability of local support and care infrastructures at the place of residence is an important issue for the elderly living in rural areas. Spatial mobility can be seen as a strategy to cope with a lack of local care facilities. This study analyzes the preferences of older people living in long-term relationships concerning support and care arrangements. Furthermore, it is analyzed how far and under which circumstances older couples are willing to relocate their place of residence in response to regional care infrastructures. Using a quasi-experimental survey design, inhabitants of a small rural community aged over 50 years were interviewed and confronted with descriptions of fictitious situations with randomized options for moving residence. A Tobit model estimation method is applied to examine the determinants of older couples' care-related willingness to move their residence.The results show that most people prefer either the support of their own partner or outpatient care. Residential care is especially preferred by people aged 75 years and above, whereas new forms of support, such as senior cooperatives, are evaluated as attractive especially by younger age groups. Thus, information and advisory campaigns should address the target group in question even at an early stage in older peoples' life course. Care-related willingness to move home of couples aged 50 years and more is significantly determined by local provision of support and care infrastructures. The expansion of any care infrastructure at older peoples' place of residence can significantly reduce their willingness to move. In particular an increased availability of outpatient care is associated with a comparatively large reduction in couples' likelihood to move. In this way local commitment to rural areas can be sustained and rural depopulation can be prevented. At an alternative place of residence assisted living and residential care in particular can significantly enhance the willingness to relocate and can thus generate incentives to move for older couples.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory care; Care preferences; Factorial survey; Social networks; Spatial mobility

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26650034     DOI: 10.1007/s00391-015-0991-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr        ISSN: 0948-6704            Impact factor:   1.281


  9 in total

1.  The second move: health and geographic mobility.

Authors:  C F Longino; D J Jackson; R S Zimmerman; J E Bradsher
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1991-07

2.  [Age-Wohnmatrix. Using basic needs rather than defined terms].

Authors:  A Jann
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.281

3.  [Considering housing arrangements in elderly life: factors influencing plans concerning future housing arrangements and preferences in a representative sample of 45+ year olds].

Authors:  L Spangenberg; H Glaesmer; E Brähler; A Kersting; B Strauß
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.281

4.  [Health care and regional disparities].

Authors:  K Hämel; M Ewers; D Schaeffer
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.281

5.  Migration patterns among the elderly: a developmental perspective.

Authors:  E Litwak; C F Longino
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1987-06

6.  [Residential mobility in old age. Age-appropriate housing as a primary preventive strategy].

Authors:  A Teti; U Grittner; A Kuhlmey; S Blüher
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.281

7.  [Tendency of development and perspectives of domestic care. Core results of the potential and limits of independent living (MuG III) study].

Authors:  U Schneekloth
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.281

8.  [Reflections on the topic of good housing conditions and growing old: Not everybody has a choice].

Authors:  A Jann
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.281

9.  [Nursing home admission for the elderly and chances for avoiding admission. Results of a representative study of facilities for inpatient nursing care].

Authors:  T Klein
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.281

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Claims data-based analysis of the influence of individual and regional characteristics on the utilisation of long-term care by people with dementia in Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany.

Authors:  Johanna Forstner; Michel Wensing; Jan Koetsenruijter; Pamela Wronski
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.921

2.  Determination of gaps in the spatial accessibility of nursing services for persons over the age of 65 with lowered self-sufficiency: Evidence from the Czech Republic.

Authors:  Iveta Vrabková; Izabela Ertingerová; Pavel Kukuliač
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Factors influencing the mutual-support willingness and needs among the rural elderly in Hunan Province, China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ke-Ru Yao; Xin-Hong Yin; Qin Luo; Xi Tang; Xiu-Zhu Tan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Do Individuals in Old Age Prepare for the Risk of Long-Term Care? Results of A Population-Based Survey in Germany.

Authors:  André Hajek; Thomas Lehnert; Annemarie Wegener; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Hans-Helmut König
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  [The attitude of patients in geriatric rehabilitation towards nursing homes].

Authors:  Natalie Schwind; Georg Jahn
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 1.281

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.