JiWon Choi1, Ji Hyeon Lee2, Eric Vittinghoff3, Yoshimi Fukuoka4. 1. Institute for Health and Aging/Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California St., Suite 340, San Francisco, CA, 94118, USA. jiwon.choi@ucsf.edu. 2. Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. Department of Physiological Nursing/Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:Physical inactivity is prevalent in pregnant women, and innovative strategies to promote physical activity are strongly needed. The purpose of the study was to test a 12-week mobile health (mHealth) physical activity intervention for feasibility and potential efficacy. METHODS:Participants were recruited between December 2012 and February 2014 using diverse recruitment methods. Thirty pregnant women between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation were randomized to an intervention (mobile phone app plus Fitbit) or a control (Fitbit) group. Both conditions targeted gradual increases in physical activity. The mHealth intervention included daily messages and a mobile phone activity diary with automated feedback and self-monitoring systems. RESULTS: On monthly average, 4 women were screened for initial eligibility by telephone and 2.5 were randomized. Intervention participants had a 1096 ± 1898 step increase in daily steps compared to an increase of 259 ± 1604 steps in control participants at 12 weeks. The change between groups in weekly mean steps per day during the 12-week study period was not statistically significant (p = 0.38). The intervention group reported lower perceived barrier to being active, lack of energy, than the control group at 12-week visit (p = 0.02). The rates of responding to daily messages and using the daily diary through the mobile app declined during the 12 week study period. DISCUSSION: It was difficult to recruit and randomize inactive women who wanted to increase physical activity during pregnancy. Pregnant women who were motivated to increase physical activity might find using mobile technologies in assessing and promoting PA acceptable. Possible reasons for the non-significant treatment effect of the mHealth intervention on physical activity are discussed. Public awareness of safety and benefits of physical activity during pregnancy should be promoted. Clinicaltrials.Gov Identifier NCT01461707.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Physical inactivity is prevalent in pregnant women, and innovative strategies to promote physical activity are strongly needed. The purpose of the study was to test a 12-week mobile health (mHealth) physical activity intervention for feasibility and potential efficacy. METHODS:Participants were recruited between December 2012 and February 2014 using diverse recruitment methods. Thirty pregnant women between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation were randomized to an intervention (mobile phone app plus Fitbit) or a control (Fitbit) group. Both conditions targeted gradual increases in physical activity. The mHealth intervention included daily messages and a mobile phone activity diary with automated feedback and self-monitoring systems. RESULTS: On monthly average, 4 women were screened for initial eligibility by telephone and 2.5 were randomized. Intervention participants had a 1096 ± 1898 step increase in daily steps compared to an increase of 259 ± 1604 steps in control participants at 12 weeks. The change between groups in weekly mean steps per day during the 12-week study period was not statistically significant (p = 0.38). The intervention group reported lower perceived barrier to being active, lack of energy, than the control group at 12-week visit (p = 0.02). The rates of responding to daily messages and using the daily diary through the mobile app declined during the 12 week study period. DISCUSSION: It was difficult to recruit and randomize inactive women who wanted to increase physical activity during pregnancy. Pregnant women who were motivated to increase physical activity might find using mobile technologies in assessing and promoting PA acceptable. Possible reasons for the non-significant treatment effect of the mHealth intervention on physical activity are discussed. Public awareness of safety and benefits of physical activity during pregnancy should be promoted. Clinicaltrials.Gov Identifier NCT01461707.
Entities:
Keywords:
Mobile health; Physical activity; Pregnancy
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Nanette Mutrie; Orla Doolin; Claire F Fitzsimons; P Margaret Grant; Malcolm Granat; Madeleine Grealy; Hazel Macdonald; Freya MacMillan; Alex McConnachie; David A Rowe; Rebecca Shaw; Dawn A Skelton Journal: Fam Pract Date: 2012-07-28 Impact factor: 2.267
Authors: Dori E Rosenberg; Elyse Kadokura; Margaret E Morris; Anne Renz; Roger M Vilardaga Journal: Methods Inf Med Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 2.176
Authors: Roger J Paxton; Jeri E Forster; Matthew J Miller; Kristine L Gerron; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley; Cory L Christiansen Journal: J Aging Phys Act Date: 2017-11-30 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Liisa Hantsoo; Stephanie Criniti; Annum Khan; Marian Moseley; Naomi Kincler; Laura J Faherty; C Neill Epperson; Ian M Bennett Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 3.084