Literature DB >> 26649384

Plastic response of fearful prey to the spatiotemporal dynamics of predator distribution.

Mathieu Basille, Daniel Fortin, Christian Dussault, Guillaume Bastille-Rousseau, Jean-pierre Ouellet, Rthaume Courtois.   

Abstract

Ecological theory predicts that the intensity of antipredator responses is dependent upon the spatiotemporal context of predation risk (the risk allocation hypothesis). However, most studies to date have been conducted over small spatial extents, and did not fully take into account gradual responses to predator proximity. We simultaneously collected spatially explicit data on predator and prey to investigate acute responses of a threatened forest ungulate, the boreal caribou (Rangifer tarandus), to the spatiotemporal dynamics of wolf (Canis lupus) distribution during spring. Movement analysis of GPS-collared individuals from both species revealed high plasticity in habitat-selection decisions of caribou. Female caribou avoided open areas and deciduous forests and moved relatively fast and toward foraging areas when wolves were closer than 2.5 km. Caribou also avoided food-rich areas only when wolves were within 1 km. Our results bridge the gap between long-term perceived risk and immediate flight responses by revealing dynamic antipredator tactics in response to predator proximity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26649384     DOI: 10.1890/14-1706.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  7 in total

1.  Habitat and social factors shape individual decisions and emergent group structure during baboon collective movement.

Authors:  Ariana Strandburg-Peshkin; Damien R Farine; Margaret C Crofoot; Iain D Couzin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Forest productivity mitigates human disturbance effects on late-seral prey exposed to apparent competitors and predators.

Authors:  Daniel Fortin; Florian Barnier; Pierre Drapeau; Thierry Duchesne; Claude Dussault; Sandra Heppell; Marie-Caroline Prima; Martin-Hugues St-Laurent; Guillaume Szor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Land Use, anthropogenic disturbance, and riverine features drive patterns of habitat selection by a wintering waterbird in a semi-arid environment.

Authors:  Matthew A Boggie; Daniel P Collins; J Patrick Donnelly; Scott A Carleton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Weak spatiotemporal response of prey to predation risk in a freely interacting system.

Authors:  Jeremy J Cusack; Michel T Kohl; Matthew C Metz; Tim Coulson; Daniel R Stahler; Douglas W Smith; Daniel R MacNulty
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 5.  "Ecology of fear" in ungulates: Opportunities for improving conservation.

Authors:  M Colter Chitwood; Carolina Baruzzi; Marcus A Lashley
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Limited spatial response to direct predation risk by African herbivores following predator reintroduction.

Authors:  Andrew B Davies; Craig J Tambling; Graham I H Kerley; Gregory P Asner
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Territory surveillance and prey management: Wolves keep track of space and time.

Authors:  Ulrike E Schlägel; Evelyn H Merrill; Mark A Lewis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.