Literature DB >> 26649363

Microchip-based electrochemical detection using a 3-D printed wall-jet electrode device.

Akash S Munshi1, R Scott Martin.   

Abstract

Three dimensional (3-D) printing technology has evolved dramatically in the last few years, offering the capability of printing objects with a variety of materials. Printing microfluidic devices using this technology offers various advantages such as ease and uniformity of fabrication, file sharing between laboratories, and increased device-to-device reproducibility. One unique aspect of this technology, when used with electrochemical detection, is the ability to produce a microfluidic device as one unit while also allowing the reuse of the device and electrode for multiple analyses. Here we present an alternate electrode configuration for microfluidic devices, a wall-jet electrode (WJE) approach, created by 3-D printing. Using microchip-based flow injection analysis, we compared the WJE design with the conventionally used thin-layer electrode (TLE) design. It was found that the optimized WJE system enhances analytical performance (as compared to the TLE design), with improvements in sensitivity and the limit of detection. Experiments were conducted using two working electrodes - 500 μm platinum and 1 mm glassy carbon. Using the 500 μm platinum electrode the calibration sensitivity was 16 times higher for the WJE device (as compared to the TLE design). In addition, use of the 1 mm glassy carbon electrode led to limit of detection of 500 nM for catechol, as compared to 6 μM for the TLE device. Finally, to demonstrate the versatility and applicability of the 3-D printed WJE approach, the device was used as an inexpensive electrochemical detector for HPLC. The number of theoretical plates was comparable to the use of commercially available UV and MS detectors, with the WJE device being inexpensive to utilize. These results show that 3-D-printing can be a powerful tool to fabricate reusable and integrated microfluidic detectors in configurations that are not easily achieved with more traditional lithographic methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26649363      PMCID: PMC5011427          DOI: 10.1039/c5an01956g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Analyst        ISSN: 0003-2654            Impact factor:   4.616


  25 in total

1.  Analysis of catecholamines in urine by positive-ion electrospray tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Mark M Kushnir; Francis M Urry; Elizabeth L Frank; William L Roberts; Bori Shushan
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Direct determination of carbohydrates, amino acids, and antibiotics by microchip electrophoresis with pulsed amperometric detection.

Authors:  Carlos D García; Charles S Henry
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Addressing a vascular endothelium array with blood components using underlying microfluidic channels.

Authors:  Luiza I Genes; Nicole V Tolan; Matthew K Hulvey; R Scott Martin; Dana M Spence
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Interfacing microchip electrophoresis to a growth tube particle collector for semicontinuous monitoring of aerosol composition.

Authors:  Scott D Noblitt; Gregory S Lewis; Yan Liu; Susanne V Hering; Jeffrey L Collett; Charles S Henry
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Micromachined electrophoresis chips with thick-film electrochemical detectors.

Authors:  J Wang; B Tian; E Sahlin
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Configurable 3D-Printed millifluidic and microfluidic 'lab on a chip' reactionware devices.

Authors:  Philip J Kitson; Mali H Rosnes; Victor Sans; Vincenza Dragone; Leroy Cronin
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 6.799

7.  Separation and detection of peroxynitrite using microchip electrophoresis with amperometric detection.

Authors:  Matthew K Hulvey; Celeste N Frankenfeld; Susan M Lunte
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 8.  Use of epoxy-embedded electrodes to integrate electrochemical detection with microchip-based analysis systems.

Authors:  Asmira Selimovic; Alicia S Johnson; István Z Kiss; R Scott Martin
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.535

9.  Voltammetry on microfluidic chip platforms

Authors: 
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Integration of on-chip peristaltic pumps and injection valves with microchip electrophoresis and electrochemical detection.

Authors:  Amanda L Bowen; R Scott Martin
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.535

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  The upcoming 3D-printing revolution in microfluidics.

Authors:  Nirveek Bhattacharjee; Arturo Urrios; Shawn Kang; Albert Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  3D Printed Microfluidic Devices for Microchip Electrophoresis of Preterm Birth Biomarkers.

Authors:  Michael J Beauchamp; Anna V Nielsen; Hua Gong; Gregory P Nordin; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Direct embedding and versatile placement of electrodes in 3D printed microfluidic-devices.

Authors:  Andre D Castiaux; Emily R Currens; R Scott Martin
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.616

4.  3D-printed Microfluidic Devices: Fabrication, Advantages and Limitations-a Mini Review.

Authors:  Chengpeng Chen; Benjamin T Mehl; Akash S Munshi; Alexandra D Townsend; Dana M Spence; R Scott Martin
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.896

5.  3D-Printed Microfluidic Device with In-line Amperometric Detection that Also Enables Multi-Modal Detection.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hayter; Andre D Castiaux; R Scott Martin
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 6.  Low-cost and open-source strategies for chemical separations.

Authors:  Joshua J Davis; Samuel W Foster; James P Grinias
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 4.759

7.  3-D printed microfluidics for rapid prototyping and testing of electrochemical, aptamer-based sensor devices under flow conditions.

Authors:  Israel Belmonte; Ryan J White
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 6.558

Review 8.  3D-Printed Biosensor Arrays for Medical Diagnostics.

Authors:  Mohamed Sharafeldin; Abby Jones; James F Rusling
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.891

9.  Bioelectrical Analysis of Various Cancer Cell Types Immobilized in 3D Matrix and Cultured in 3D-Printed Well.

Authors:  Georgia Paivana; Sophie Mavrikou; Grigoris Kaltsas; Spyridon Kintzios
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-14

Review 10.  Microfluidics by Additive Manufacturing for Wearable Biosensors: A Review.

Authors:  Mahshid Padash; Christian Enz; Sandro Carrara
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.