| Literature DB >> 26649323 |
Hai-Yan Qiu1, Sha-Sha Yuan1, Fang-Yuan Yang1, Ting-Ting Shi1, Jin-Kui Yang1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of moxifloxacin on HERG channel protein and glucose metabolism. HERG expression was investigated using immunohistochemistry. The whole-cell patch clamp method was used to examine the effect of moxifloxacin on HERG channel currents. A glucose tolerance test was used to analyze the effects of moxifloxacin on blood glucose and insulin concentrations in mice. Results show that HERG protein was expressed in human pancreatic β-cells. Moxifloxacin inhibited HERG time-dependent and tail currents in HEK293 cells in a concentration-dependent manner. The IC50 of moxifloxacin inhibition was 36.65 μmol/L. Moxifloxacin (200 mg/kg) reduced blood glucose levels and increased insulin secretion in wild-type mice at 60 min after the start of the glucose tolerance test. In contrast, moxifloxacin did not significantly alter blood glucose and insulin levels in HERG knockout mice. Serum glucose levels increased and insulin concentrations decreased in HERG knockout mice when compared to wild-type mice. The moxifloxacin-induced decrease in blood glucose and increase in insulin secretion occurred via the HERG protein; thus, HERG protein plays a role in insulin secretion.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26649323 PMCID: PMC4663361 DOI: 10.1155/2016/6741745
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Diabetes Res Impact factor: 4.011
Figure 1HERG channel proteins expressed in human pancreatic islets. (a) Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI and are illustrated in blue. (b) Insulin immunoreactive cells (red) in the same islet. (c) HERG protein-positive cells (green) in the same islet. (d) Colocalization of insulin and HERG protein.
Figure 2Moxifloxacin-induced inhibition of the HERG channel in HEK293 cells. (a) Cells were voltage-clamped at −80 mV for 1 s, were depolarized from −60 mV to +50 mV for 3 s, and were repolarized to −40 mV for 3 s. HERG currents were recorded in transfected HEK293 cells with and without 100 μmol/L of moxifloxacin. (b) The time-dependent current and peak tail current I-V curves were recorded before and after cell perfusion with 100 μmol/L of moxifloxacin. (c) Cells were depolarized to a voltage of +20 mV for 3 s using a stepped procedure. Peak tail currents were recorded at different moxifloxacin concentrations (10, 100, and 1000 μmol/L). (d) A moxifloxacin concentration-response curve was fitted to a Hill equation, y = [(A 1 − A 2)/(1 + (x/C)n )] + A 2, in which A 1 represents 0 tail current inhibition, A 2 represents 100% inhibition, C represents the IC50 concentration, and n represents the Hill slope. P < 0.001, n = 4.
Figure 3Glucose tolerance test in mice that received moxifloxacin or saline. (a and b) Blood glucose and serum insulin concentrations in wild-type mice that underwent a glucose tolerance test after treatment with 200 mg/kg of moxifloxacin or physiological saline. (c and d) Blood glucose and serum insulin concentrations in HERG knockout mice that underwent a glucose tolerance test after treatment with 200 mg/kg of moxifloxacin or physiological saline. P < 0.05, P < 0.01, n = 5.