| Literature DB >> 26648935 |
Heather Weir1, Patricia L Chen2, Thaddeus C Deiss2, Natalie Jacobs2, Mary B Nabity3, Matt Young1, Michael F Criscitiello2.
Abstract
Distinct methods are required for inducing mucosal versus systemic immunity in mammals for vaccine protection at the tissues most commonly breached by pathogens. Understanding of mucosal immunization in teleost fish is needed to combat aquaculture disease, understand emerging ecological threats, and know how vertebrate adaptive immunity evolved. Here, we quantitatively measured expression levels of IgM as well as the teleost mucosal immunoglobulin, IgZ/IgT, in zebrafish given an antigen systemically via intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection or mucosally via bath immersion. Both immunoglobulin isotypes and the B cell activating factor gene transcription was induced in fish injected with antigen as compared to saline injected or antigen immersed fish, though these failed to reach statistical significance. Here we provide additional reference hematology for this model species. Differential blood counts revealed a greater lymphocyte percentage in both i.p. and immersed fish, with increase in large lymphocyte counts and decrease in neutrophils. These humoral adaptive gene transcription and cytological data should provide a foundation for more studies connecting immunology in this dominant developmental and genetic fish model to other species where mucosal immunization is of greater commercial importance.Entities:
Keywords: BAFF; IgZ; immersion immunization; mucosal; zebrafish
Year: 2015 PMID: 26648935 PMCID: PMC4664633 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00606
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Zebrafish hematology. Wright/Giemsa stained zebrafish blood smears (A–C) Differentiating small lymphocytes (green arrows) from thrombocytes (red arrows). Immature reticulocytes are also seen (blue arrows) (D–G). Neutrophils (orange arrows) are typically seen with bilobed nuclei, whereas large mononuclear cells (yellow arrow) have a round nucleus. Blood smear images were captured under 1000× total magnification with oil.
Differential blood counts (lymphocyte summary).
| Fish | Control | Injection | Mucosal | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SmLym (%) | LgLym (%) | Total (%) | SmLym (%) | LgLym (%) | Total (%) | SmLym (%) | LgLym (%) | Total (%) | |
| #1 | 51 | 18 | 69 | 88 | 12 | 100 | 82 | 2 | 84 |
| #2 | 56 | 30 | 86 | 80 | 10 | 90 | 86 | 7 | 93 |
| #3 | 68 | 11 | 79 | 75 | 11 | 86 | 98 | 1 | 99 |
| #4 | 72 | 10 | 82 | 42 | 29 | 71 | 96 | 2 | 98 |
| #5 | 85 | 8 | 93 | 73 | 16 | 89 | 72 | 13 | 85 |
| #6 | 80 | 14 | 94 | 89 | 8 | 97 | 73 | 9 | 82 |
| #7 | 69 | 12 | 81 | 74 | 12 | 86 | 76 | 7 | 83 |
| #8 | 89 | 3 | 92 | 71 | 18 | 89 | 71 | 6 | 77 |
| #9 | 62 | 12 | 74 | 66 | 21 | 87 | 82 | 9 | 91 |
| #9(R) | 68 | 22 | 90 | ||||||
| #10 | 45 | 12 | 57 | 90 | 5 | 95 | 59 | 10 | 69 |
| #11 | 44 | 22 | 66 | 54 | 36 | 90 | 55 | 6 | 61 |
| #12 | 75 | 5 | 80 | 86 | 8 | 94 | 32 | 15 | 47 |
| #13 | 40 | 29 | 69 | 49 | 8 | 57 | |||
| #14 | 76 | 17 | 93 | 78 | 16 | 94 | |||
| #15 | 90 | 4 | 94 | 78 | 10 | 88 | |||
Figure 2Lymphocyte percentages shift upon immunization. (A) Bar graphs displaying percentages of small lymphocytes only and (B) large lymphocytes in peripheral blood at termination of 4-week immunization experiment. (C) Box and whisker plots of all cell type percentages. The box extends from first quartile to third quartile, the line in the box is the median, and whiskers extend to 1.5 times the inter-quartile range, outliers are points outside this range. Asterisks p < 0.01.
Figure 3IgM levels were raised in injected fish compared to control and mucosal, but not to statistical significance. All statistically relevant differences observed via ANOVA and post hoc TukeyHSD indicated by asterisks p < 0.01.