| Literature DB >> 26648771 |
Andrzej Koncicki1, Marcin Śmiałek1, Bartłomiej Tykałowski1, Daria Pestka1, Tomasz Stenzel1.
Abstract
The aim of our study was to investigate the influence of adiSalmoSOL PF dietary supplement, given for 3 days in drinking water, on selected parameters of cell-mediated (Experiment I) and humoral (Experiment II) immunity in chicken and turkey broilers. In Experiment I, birds were randomly divided into two groups of 10 birds each. Group 1 comprised control turkeys or chickens, whereas group 2 birds were administered adiSalmo(SOL)PF. In Experiment II, a total of 69 chickens were divided into three groups (1-3) of 23 birds each. At the age of 25 days, group 1 was given adiSalmo(SOL)PF. Birds from groups 1-3 were vaccinated at 28 days of age. Group 2 was given adiSalmo(SOL)PF after vaccination. In Experiment I, a significant increase in percentages of CD4 + T lymphocytes in the bursa of Fabricius, cecal tonsils and spleen, CD8 + T lymphocytes in the thymus and spleen, CD4 + CD8 + T lymphocytes in the bursa of Fabricius and ileal mucosa and IgM + B lymphocyte in the ileal mucosa were observed in group 2 chickens. In Experiment I, a significant increase in percentages of CD4 + T lymphocytes in the thymus and spleen, CD8+ T lymphocytes in the cecal tonsils and blood, and CD4 + CD8 + T lymphocytes in the thymus and ileal mucosa was recorded in group 2 turkeys. No differences in percentages of IgM + B lymphocytes were observed between turkey groups. In Experiment II, the highest post-vaccination titers of anti-IB antibodies were observed in group 2, but it was not statistically significant. The results of our study indicate that adiSalmo(SOL)PF showed immunomodulatory activity in chickens and turkeys.Entities:
Keywords: cell-mediated immunity; chickens; humoral immunity; phytoncides; turkeys
Year: 2015 PMID: 26648771 PMCID: PMC4655377 DOI: 10.5114/ceji.2015.54588
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cent Eur J Immunol ISSN: 1426-3912 Impact factor: 2.085
Percentages of T and B cells subpopulations in immunological structures of broiler chickens after oral administration of adiSalmoSOLPF (n = 7). Results are presented as , SD, V% percentage of investigated immunocompetent cells in each structure of control (group 1) and experimental (group 2) chickens
| Cells | Group | Bursa of Fabricius | Thymus | Cecal tonsils | Ileum | Spleen | Blood |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD4+ T | 1 | 0.92 0.17 18.89 | 1.36 0.35 25.64 | 18.20 3.37 18.51 | 14.96 2.78 18.59 | 5.50 1.49 27.02 | 3.94 0.72 18.30 |
| CD8+ T | 1 | 3.84 1.13 29.52 | 6.23 1.63 26.13 | 11.70 1.99 17.05 | 32.34 7.54 23.33 | 7.93 2.72 34.29 | 2.21 0.51 23.31 |
| DP T | 1 | 0.22 0.11 48.96 | 82.23 1.97 2.40 | 0.84 0.23 27.30 | 0.95 0.38 40.14 | 0.22 0.13 58.59 | 0.10 0.04 41.14 |
| IgM+ B | 1 | 92.15 1.23 1.34 | 0.70 0.09 13.17 | 55.35 3.73 6.74 | 11.58 2.19 18.87 | 48.26 15.78 32.70 | 6.76 0.86 12.77 |
U, p – result of statistical tests; DP – double positive CD 4 + CD 8+ T cells
p ≤ 0.1
p ≤ 0.01
Percentages of T and B cells subpopulations in immunological structures of turkeys after oral administration of adiSalmoSOLPF (n = 7). Results are presented as , SD, V% percentage of investigated immunocompetent cells in each structure of control (group 1) and experimental (group 2) turkeys
| Cells | Group Bursa of fabricius | Thymus | Cecal tonsils | Ileum | Spleen | Blood | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD4+ T | 1 | 0.48 0.18 38.93 | 0.87 0.31 35.26 | 24.02 1.76 5.18 | 24.44 4.94 20.23 | 24.30 3.15 12.97 | 8.91 1.71 19.18 |
| CD8+ T | 1 | 1.38 0.19 13.76 | 5.86 1.63 27.28 | 11.84 1.61 13.60 | 24.40 2.67 10.92 | 38.96 3.64 9.35 | 1.42 0.23 16.47 |
| DP T | 1 | 0.52 0.25 47.68 | 84.54 3.00 3.55 | 5.12 1.55 30.30 | 22.59 7.24 32.03 | 3.64 0.88 24.05 | 0.32 0.14 42.75 |
| IgM+ B | 1 | 89.34 1.99 2.23 | 0.84 0.21 25.16 | 31.95 3.18 9.94 | 8.45 2.96 35.03 | 21.80 5.42 24.85 | 11.31 2.89 25.38 |
U, p – result of statistical tests; DP – double positive CD 4 + CD 8+ T cells
p ≤ 0.1
p ≤ 0.01
Antibody titer against IBV (test ELISA) in blood serum of vaccinated broiler chickens not receiving (group 3) or receiving adiSalmoSOLPF for three day prior to (group 1) or post IB vaccination (group 2) (n = 23)
| Group | Antibody titer ( | Statistical difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before vaccination | Post vaccination | |||
| 1 | 77.53; 75.73 | 6389.58; 2384.98 | < 0.0001 | |
| 2 | 77.1; 47.89 | 6944.00; 3577.74 | < 0.0001 | |
| 3 | 64.2; 79.74 | 5776.67; 2796.55 | < 0.0001 | |
p ≤ 0.01