| Literature DB >> 26648765 |
Takashi Moriwaki1, Koichi Iwatsuki1, Yu-Ichiro Ohnishi1, Koshi Ninomiya1, Toshiki Yoshimine1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In the current report, we describe a case of an extramedullary ependymoma involving a lumbar nerve root near conus medullaris. Spinal ependymomas commonly present as intramedullary tumors in the cervical or thoracic cord or as tumors arising from the conus medullaris or the filum terminale. In this case, we showed an extramedullary conus ependymoma involving a lumbar nerve root with filum terminale attachment. CASEEntities:
Keywords: ependymoma; intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumor; spinal tumor
Year: 2015 PMID: 26648765 PMCID: PMC4666522 DOI: 10.4137/CCRep.S24719
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Med Insights Case Rep ISSN: 1179-5476
Figure 1(A) Sagittal T1-weighted image demonstrated isointensity intradural mass at T12–L1. (B) Sagittal T2-weighted image demonstrated iso or slightly high-intensity intradural extramedullary mass at T12–L1 near the conus medullaris. (C) Coronal post-gadolinium T1-weighted image showing that the congestive pial vein extended to the level of T11 (white arrow). (D) Sagittal post-gadolinium T1-weighted image demonstrated a 28 × 14 mm enhanced intradural extramedullary mass at T12–L1 near the conus medullaris. (E) Axial post-gadolinium T1-weighted image demonstrated that the tumor had compressed the conus medullaris to the left ventral side.
Figure 2After opening the dura mater, adhesion between the arachnoid membrane and dura mater was confirmed in the dorsal aspect of the tumor (black arrow).
Figure 3Macroscopic appearance of the tumor at surgery: the tumor had involved a lumbar nerve root and attached to the filum terminale. The double black arrows indicate the lumbar nerve root that had been encompassed by the tumor.
Figure 4The tumor had not adhered to the conus medullaris (white arrow). Additionally, the tumor had attached to the filum terminale, which was determined to be remarkably narrowed (black arrow).
Figure 5(A) Perivascular pseudorosettes were identified (black arrow). There were no features unique to the myxopapillary subtype, such as mucin (hematoxylin and eosin, original magnification × 100). (B) Image showing tumor cells immunoreactive for GFAP is focal (original magnification × 100). (C) Ki-67 immunostaining of the tumor showing a mitotic index of 1–3% (original magnification × 200).
Clinical features of patients with extramedullary ependymomas near the conus medullaris and spinal nerve root.
| AUTHOR | DATA | AGE | GENDER | LOCATION | PRESENTATION | OPERATION | ADJUNCT TX | WHO GRADE | OUTCOME |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moser FG et al | 1992 | 31y | Female | L2–3 | LBP + Radiculopathy + | Laminectomy: complete resection | None | Myxopapillary ependymoma: grade 1 | No neurological deficit |
| Bonfield CM et al | 2011 | 87y | L2 | LBP + Radiculopathy + | Laminectomy: complete resection | None | Non-myxopapillary ependymoma: grade 2 | No neurological deficit | |
| Moriwaki T et al | 2012 | 69y | Female | T12-L1 | LBP + Radiculopat y − | Laminectomy: complete resection | None | Non-myxopapillary ependymoma: grade 2 | No neurological deficit |
Abbreviations: Tx, treatment; y, year; LBP, lower back pain.