Literature DB >> 26648274

GNRs@SiO₂-FA in combination with radiotherapy induces the apoptosis of HepG2 cells by modulating the expression of apoptosis-related proteins.

Bin Gao1, Lei Shen1, Ke-Wu He1, Wei-Hua Xiao2.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine the apoptosis of the hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, HepG2, induced by treatment with folic acid-conjugated silica-coated gold nanorods (GNRs@SiO2-FA) in combination with radiotherapy, and to determine the involvement of apoptosis-related proteins. An MTT colorimetric assay was used to assess the biocompatibility of GNRs@SiO2-FA. The distribution of GNRs@SiO2-FA into the cells was observed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). HepG2 cells cultured in vitro were divided into the following 4 groups: i)the control group (untreated), ii) the GNRs@SiO2-FA group, iii) the radiotherapy group (iodine 125 seeds) and iv) the combination group (treated with GNRs@SiO2-FA and iodine 125 seeds) groups. The apoptosis of the HepG2 cells was detected by flow cytometry. The concentration range of <40 µg/ml GNRs@SiO2-FA was found to be safe for the biological activity of the HepG2 cells. GNRs@SiO2-FA entered the cytoplasm through endocytosis. The apoptotic rates of the HepG2 cells were higher in the GNRs@SiO2-FA and radiotherapy groups than in the control group (P<0.05). The apoptotic rate was also significantly higher in the combination group than the GNRs@SiO2-FA and radiotherapy groups (P<0.05). Taken together, these findings demonstrate that the combination of GNRs@SiO2-FA and radiotherapy more effectively induces the apoptosis of HepG2 cells. These apoptotic effects are achieved by increasing the protein expression of Bax and caspase-3, and inhibiting the protein expression of Bcl-2 and Ki-67. The combination of GNRs@SiO2-FA and radiotherapy may thus prove to be a new approach in the treatment of primary liver cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26648274      PMCID: PMC4601742          DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Med        ISSN: 1107-3756            Impact factor:   4.101


Introduction

Hepatic cancer is a common malignant tumor, which ranks fifth in terms of global incidence and third in terms of cancer-related mortality worldwide (1). Although surgery is the preferred treatment option for patients with hepatic cancer, the overall morbidity rate following resection is only about 22–42% (2). Therefore, the treatment of hepatic cancer involves the joint application of various types of non-surgical treatments. The implantation of radioactive iodine 125 seeds has been used widely in the treatment of hepatic cancer, with profound effects. The process of particle implantation is performed manually, and is done irrespective of the 'hot' and 'cold' spots of radiation (3). Full conformal radiotherapy is difficult to implement. As a novel precious material, metal nanoparticles, namely gold nanorods (GNRs) have unique optical properties (4), and have a low toxicity and good biocompatibility (5). GNRs have been used as a radiation sensitizer (6). Currently, GNRs are being used in combination with internal radiotherapy in targeted cancer therapy and are becoming a hotspot in cancer treatment (7,8). However, GNRs require certain surface modifications to ensure good compatibility in order to provide the optimal effects from their clinical application. Silica-coated gold nanorods (GNRs@SiO2) are relatively easy to prepare, and may help to maintain low levels of cytotoxicity. The silica surface is easy for amination, as its surface amino integrates with the carboxyl of folic acid (FA) to build a covalent bond, and this functions as a bridge for the folate-conjugated GNRs. Research has shown that FA receptors are highly expressed on the surface of malignant cancer cells than on normal cells (9). However, hepatic colorectal cancer cells have a surfaces rich in FA receptors (10); FA are natural ligands and a strong binding force for FA receptors. Therefore, FA may be used as a tumor targeting factor, and FA may be efficiently targeted into the liver cancer cells (11); thus, it may lay the foundation for folate-targeted cancer therapy. In this study, we investigated a new treatment method. We used iodine 125 seeds to irradiate tumor cells, as well as folic acid-conjugated silica-coated GNRs (GNRs@SiO2-FA) to target folate receptors highly expressed on the surface membrane of cancer cells, as described in a previous study (4). The present study aimed to investigate the apoptosis of the hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, HepG2, induced by treatment with GNRs@SiO2-FA in combination with radiotherapy. In addition, we examined the involvement of apoptosis-related proteins (e.g., Bax, Bcl-2, Ki67) in these effects.

Materials and methods

Materials

HepG2 cells were obtained from the cell bank of the Type Culture Collection of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Cell culture reagents were purchased from Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA. Chlorauric acid (HAuCl4·3H2O), 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), folic acid (FA) and (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTS) were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA); cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), silver nitrate (AgNO3) and sodium borohydride (NaBH4) were from Aladdin (Shanghai, China); tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) and ascorbic acid were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). 2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and cell apoptosis reagents were purchased from BestBio (Shanghai, China). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-related reagents and cell incubators were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. (Rockford, IL, USA). Anti-Bax (ab77566), anti-Bcl-2 (15071s) and anti-Ki-67 (PB0065) antibodies were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK), Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA) and Boster Biological Technology, Ltd. (Wuhan, China), respectively.

Synthesis and characterization of GNRs@SiO2-FA

The gold nanorods (GNRs) were synthesized as previously described (12). Briefly, 0.6 ml ice-cold 0.01 M NaBH4 was mixed with 10 ml of aqueous solution containing 7.5 ml 0.2 M CTAB and 2.5 ml 0.001 M HAuCl4 under vigorous stirring. It was then kept at 25°C for at least 2 h prior to use as a seed solution. The growth solution contained 50 ml 0.2 M CTAB, 50 ml 0.001 M HAuCl4, 1 ml 0.004 M AgNO3 and 0.7 ml 0.0778 M ascorbic acid. After gently mixing the growth solution, 80 µl of seed solution were added and kept at 30°C for 24 h to obtain the GNRs. Next, the spherical core-shell silica-coated GNRs (GNRs@ SiO2) were successfully prepared using the sol-gel method. First, the obtained GNRs were washed with deionized water twice to remove the excess CTAB and redispersed in 40 ml of water. Subsequently, aqueous ammonia solution was added to obtain a pH of approximately 10, and 8 ml of 10 mM TEOS/ethanol solution were added to the solution. The reaction mixture was allowed to react for 24 h under vigorous stirring. The resulting mesoporous silica-coated GNRs (GNRs@SiO2) were redispersed in absolute ethyl alcohol. Finally, the GNRs@SiO2 were conjugated with folic acid (GNRs@SiO2-FA). EDC and NHS were used to activate the carboxyl groups of folic acid (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Synthetic procedure used to obtain GNRs@SiO2-FA. GNRs, gold nanorods; GNRs@SiO2-FA, folic acid-conjugated silica-coated gold nanorods.

Cell culture

The human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, HepG2, was used in the experiments. The cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (both from Gibco) at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).

Cell viability assay

The HepG2 cells were cultured in a 96-well plate at a density of 5×103 cells/ml for 24 h, and the culture medium was then replaced with solutions containing either GNRs, GNRs@SiO2, or GNRs@SiO2-FA, which were pre-mixed with fresh DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS [gold (Au) concentrations were 40, 20, 10, 5 and 2.5 ppm]. Untreated cells served as the controls. The cells were cultured for a further 48 h, and the culture medium was then replaced with 0.2 ml fresh culture medium containing MTT assay reagent (4 mg/ml), followed by incubation for a further 4 h. DMSO (100 µl) was added to each well to dissolve the colored crystals. The optical density of the colored product was measured at 490 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Tek ELx800; Bio-Tek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA).

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to determine the distribution of GNRs@SiO2-FA within cells

The HepG2 cells were cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS, under standard cell culture conditions (5% CO2, 37°C) for 24 h. The cells were washed 3 times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The experimental group was treated with 9 ml of DMEM medium and 1 ml of 40 µg/ml GNRs@SiO2-FA solution, and the control group (untreated) was treated with 10 ml DMEM medium. The cells in the experimental group were then fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde, followed by ethanol-acetone gradient dehydration and embedding in epoxy resin. The cells were then visualized under a transmission electron microscope (JEM-2100; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).

Determination of targeting efficacy of GNRs@SiO2-FA

The HepG2 cells were cultured in a 6-well plate at a density of 5×104 cells/ml for 24 h. The cells were divided into 2 groups: in one group, 100 µl of GNRs@SiO2 were added to each well, and in the other group, 100 µl of GNRs@SiO2-FA were added to each well. The cells were then incubated in humidified air at 37°C with 5% CO2. The cultivation of cells was terminated after 1, 4, 8, 16 and 24 h, and this was followed by the collection of the cells, the detection of Au elements by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), and the calculation of the cell solid Au element content per kilogram. First, a total of 10 (2 ml) centrifuge tubes (mg) were measured for electronic balance. Before the cells were harvested, they were washed with PBS 3 times to remove the free GNRs@ SiO2-FA and GNRs@SiO2. The cells were then digested with 300 µl 0.25% trypsin. This was followed by the addition of 500 µl DMEM and 1 ml PBS, and the cells were then collected and placed within weighed 2 ml centrifuge tubes. Next, using a thermostat (60 degrees), the centrifuge tubes containing the cells were dried. They were then weighed for electronic balance, and the quality of the cell solid material was obtained by subtracting the previous record of quality. This was followed by the additino of 500 µl aqua regia to each tube, and the solid material was dissolved by ultrasound, with the addition of triple-distilled water to a final volume of 10 ml. Finally, the Au element was detected by ICP-MS and the Au element content was caclulated per kg cell solids (mg/kg).

Apoptosis assay

HepG2 cells, cultured in vitro, were divided into the following 4 groups: i) the control group (untreated), ii) the GNRs@SiO2-FA group (40 µg/ml), iii) the iodine 125 seeds group (9 grains, 0.8 mCi), and iv) the combination group (with GNRs@SiO2-FA and iodine 125 seeds). The cells in the 4 groups were collected and washed twice with cold PBS. The cells were centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for 5 min and were then resuspended in 100 µl of Annexin V binding buffer at a density of 1×106 cells/ml. The cells were incubated with 5 µl of Alexa Fluor 488 Annexin V conjugate and 5 µl of propidium iodide (PI) (both from BestBio) for 15 min at room temperature in the dark; 400 µl of 1X binding buffer was added to each sample tube, and the samples were immediately analyzed using a flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Histograms and statistics were processed using FlowJo software version 7.6.1.

Semi-quantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR

Bax and Bcl-2 mRNA expression levels were measured by RT-PCR. The HepG2 cells (1×106), which were treated with GNRs in combination with iodine 125 seeds, were collected and counted. The analysis was performed using the two-step RT-PCR kit (Takara Co., Dalian, China). The purity of the total RNA was determined using a UV spectrophotometer (UV-2450; Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) at OD260/OD280 (>1.8). The amplification method was as follows: Bax, 30 cycles; Bcl-2, 32 cycles; GAPDH, 32 cycles (94°C, 30 sec; 56°C, 30 sec; 72°C, 1 min). The amplified product was analyzed by gel electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel and EB staining (ImageJ software). The primer sequences and PCR product sizes are listed in Table I.
Table I

Primers used for RT-PCR.

Forward primerReverse primerAmplified fragment length (bp)
Bax5′-GCCCACCAGCTCTGAGCAGATCAT-3′5′-CGGCAATCATCCTCTGCAGC-3′209
Bcl-25′-GACTTCGCCGAGATGTCCAG-3′5′-CAGGTGCCGGTTCAGGTACT-3′225
GAPDH5′-AGAAGGCTGGGGCTCATTTG-3′5′-AGGGGCCATCCACAGTCTTC-3′258

RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Western blot analysis

For protein extraction, protein extraction solution with protease inhibitor (1% Triton-X100, 0.1% SDS, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 1% deoxycholic acid, 2 mM EDTA pH 8.0) was used, and the protein was quantified using a BCA Protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) to plot a standard curve. The protein samples were boiled for 5 min, loaded and subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), and were subsequently transferred onto a PVDF membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% BSA for 1 h at room temperature and probed with rabbit antibodies against Bcl-2, Bax and caspase-3 (anti-caspase-3 antibody from Cell Signaling Technology) (all 1:1,000 dilution) overnight at 4°C. The membrane was washed with Tris-HCl buffer containing Tween-20 (TBST 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl and 0.05% Tween-20) and incubated in horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary goat anti-rabbit antibody (Cat. no. 49620; Cell Signaling Technology) (1:4,000 dilution) for 1 h at room temperature. The blots were developed by adding electrochemiluminescence (ECL) detection reagents.

Immunostaining for Bcl-2, Bax and Ki-67 cell markers

Both the treated and untreated HepG2 cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. The cells were permeabilized for 10 min at room temperature in 0.4% Triton X-100 diluted in PBS. The fixed cells were incubated overnight at 4°C with each of the primary antibodies: anti-Bax (1:100), anti-Ki-67 (1:100) and anti-Bcl-2 (1:50). On the following day, after 3 washes with PBS, the secondary biotin-labeled antibody (SP9001; ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China) was used at 1:200. For color development, streptavidin was labeled with HRP at 1:200, using the streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (SABC) method.

Immunohistochemical staining

Bax-positive staining (tan) was observed in the cytoplasm, and Bcl-2-positive staining (tan) sd was observed in the cytoplasm and cell membrane. To quantify protein expression in the various samples, a scoring method was applied. A mean percentage of positive cancer cells was determined from at least 5 areas at ×400 magnification and assigned to 1 of the following 5 categories, as previously described (13): 0 point, <5%; 1 point, 5–25%; 2 point, 26–50%; 3 point, 51–75%; and 4 point, >75%. Points for staining and percentages were multiplied for a 10-point scale as follows: 0 point, negative (−); 1–3 points, weakly positive (+); 4–6 points, positive (++); and 7–9 points, strongly positive (+++). For cells that showed heterogeneous staining, the predominant pattern was taken into account for scoring. The percentage of positive cancer cells and the staining intensity were multiplied to produce a weighted score for each case. Cases with a weighted surviving score <1 were considered to be negative. Positive Ki-67 staining was indicated by the presence of fine tan particles in the nucleus. Each slice was observed at >10 typical views (at a high magnification, ×400), counting at least 200 cells. The percentage of positive cells indicated the Ki-67 cell proliferation index, which was termed KI.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 16.0 software for Windows. The cell survival rate was determined by MTT assay and the differences in the apoptotic rate in the 4 groups was analyzed by one-way ANOVA. P-values <0.05 were considered to indicate statistically significant differences.

Results

Synthesis of GNRs@SiO2-FA and cellular uptake

GNRs@SiO2-FA distribution in the cells was determined by TEM. The prepared GNRs@SiO2-FA had an ellipsoid shape. The GNRs were composed of a central rod, approximately 40 nm long and 10 nm wide, with a coating of silica on the surface. We demonstrated that GNRs@SiO2-FA entered the cells in the form of nanoparticles. We also found that following entry into the cell, the ellipsoid shape of the GNRs@SiO2-FA was retained (Fig. 2).
Figure 2

(a and b) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of folic acid-conjugated silica-coated gold nanorods (GNRs@SiO2-FA). (c and d) TEM images showing the distribution of GNRs@SiO2-FA in HepG2 cells. (a) ×60,000 magnification; (b) ×2,000,000 magnification. Black arrows represent the rod-like structure of GNR and the mesoporous structure of SiO2 and white arrows indicate aggregated GNRs@SiO2-FA.

GNRs decrease cell viability at the concentration >5 ppm

The results of MTT assay revealed that cell viability decreased as the GNR concentration increased in the culture medium. The cell survival rates in each group were as follows: GNRs group were 59.1, 71.8, 80.5, 85.3 and 91.1%; the GNRs@SiO2 group were 80.3, 85.7, 88.8, 95.8 and 97.1%; and the GNRs@SiO2-FA group were 92.3, 93.6, 95.4, 98.7 and 99.4%, respectively compared to treatment with 2.5, 5, 10, 20 and 40 ppm of the GNRs/GNRs@SiO2/GNRs@SiO2-FA. When the concentration of the Au element was ≥5 ppm, all 3 groups (GNRs, GNRs@SiO2 and GNRs@SiO2-FA) exhibited statistically significant differences compared to the untreated controls (P<0.05). The cell growth inhibitory effects of GNRs@SiO2-FA were not as prominent as those of the GNRs and GNRs@SiO2. The GNRs alone had the most prominent inhibitory effect on cell growth (Fig. 3).
Figure 3

Viability of HepG2 cells treated with various concentrations of GNRs, GNRs@SiO2 and GNRs@SiO2-FA for 48 h. #P<0.05, compared to controls. GNRs, gold nanorods; GNRs@SiO2, silica-coated gold nanorods; GNRs@SiO2-FA, folic acid-conjugated silica-coated gold nanorods.

Targeting efficacy of GNRs@SiO2-FA

As shown in Fig. 4, the cellular uptake rate of GNRs@SiO2-FA was 2.65-fold higher than that of GNRs@SiO2 at 4 h, and the cellular uptake rate in both groups reached a plateau at subsequent time points (16 and 24 h. This indicated that we had successfully prepared GNRs@SiO2-FA with a high targeting ability, and with the ability to bind with folate receptors within a short period of time. This experiment also revealed that nanoparticles can enter cells by endocytosis; however, entry by endocytosis is less efficient compared with the folate receptor-mediated entry of nanoparticles into cells.
Figure 4

Uptake of GNRs@SiO2 and GNRs@SiO2-FA by HepG2 cells analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). GNRs@ SiO2-FA, folic acid-conjugated silica-coated gold nanorods; GNRs@SiO2, silica-coated gold nanorods.

GNRs@SiO2-FA significantly increase the apoptosis of HepG2 cells

The apoptotic rates of the HepG2 cells were higher in the GNRs@SiO2-FA group and the iodine 125 seeds group than in the control group (P<0.05). The apoptotic rate was also significantly higher in the combination group than in either the GNRs@SiO2-FA group or iodine 125 seed group (P<0.05) (Fig. 5 and Table II).
Figure 5

Effects of nanoparticle administration on the apoptosis in HepG2 cells determined by flow cytometry. (a) control group; (b) GNRs@SiO2-FA group; (c) iodine 125 seeds group; (d) combination (GNRs@SiO2-FA + iodine 125 seeds) group. GNRs@SiO2, silica-coated gold nanorods; GNRs@SiO2-FA, folic acid-conjugated silica-coated gold nanorods.

Table II

Apoptotic rate of HepG2 cells.

GroupsnApoptotic rate (%)
Control group105.91±1.52
GNRs@SiO2-FA group1010.16±3.18
Iodine 125 seeds group1020.78±4.79a
Combination group1033.41±8.00a
F-value99.82
P-value0.00

P<0.05 compared with other groups. GNRs@SiO2, silica-coated gold nanorods; GNRs@SiO2-FA, folic acid-conjugated silica-coated gold nanorods; n, number of experiments performed.

GNRs@SiO2-FA alters Bax and Bcl-2 mRNA expression in HepG2 cells

RT-PCR revealed that the mRNA expression of Bax significantly increased, and the mRNA expression of Bcl-2 significantly decreased in the combination group to a greater extent compared with either the GNRs@SiO2-FA group or the iodine 125 seed group (Fig. 6).
Figure 6

(a and b) RT-PCR results of Bax, Bcl-2 and GAPDH mRNA expression in HepG2 cells. Lane 1, DNA marker; lane 2, control group; lane 3, GNRs@SiO2-FA group; lane 4, Iodine-125 seeds group; lane 5, combination (GNRs@SiO2-FA + iodine 125 seeds) group; *P<0.05, compared with control group. GNRs@SiO2, silica-coated gold nanorods; GNRs@SiO2-FA, folic acid-conjugated silica-coated gold nanorods.

GNRs@SiO2-FA alters the protein expression of apoptosis-related proteins

Western blot analysis revealed that the expression of the apoptosis-related proteins, Bax and caspase-3, was significantly upregulated in the combination group to a greater extent compared with either the GNRs@SiO2-FA group or the iodine 125 seed group. The expression of Bcl-2 was, however, downregulated (Fig. 7).
Figure 7

(a and b) Protein expression of Bcl-2, caspase-3 and Bax in HepG2 cells treated with GNRs@SiO2-FA, iodine 125 seeds, GNRs@SiO2-FA + iodine-125 seeds for 48 h. *P<0.05 compared to control. GNRs@SiO2, silica-coated gold nanorods; GNRs@SiO2-FA, folic acid-conjugated silica-coated gold nanorods.

GNRs@SiO2-FA alters the protein expression of apoptosis-related proteins as shown by immunohistochemical staining Bax protein expression in HepG2 cells

In the 4 groups of HepG2 cells, the percentage of Bax-positive cells was found to be 0.95±0.18, 1.51±0.44, 4.29±0.86 and 7.55±1.40 in the control, GNRs@SiO2-FA, iodine 125 seed and the combination group, respectively. Compared with the GNRs@SiO2-FA and iodine 125 seeds groups, the protein expression level of Bax was significantly increased in the combination group (P<0.05) (Fig. 8 and Table III).
Figure 8

(A and B) Bax, Bcl-2 and Ki-67 protein expression in HepG2 cells in the different groups detected by immunohistochemistry. a) Control group; (b) GNRs@SiO2-FA group; (c) iodine 125 seeds group; (d) GNRs@SiO2-FA + iodine 125 seeds group. GNRs@SiO2, silica-coated gold nanorods; GNRs@ SiO2-FA, folic acid-conjugated silica-coated gold nanorods; KI, Ki-67 cell proliferation index. *P<0.05 compared to control.

Table III

The integral value of Bax, Bcl-2, and KI in HepG2 cells in the different groups.

GroupsnBaxBcl-2KI
Control group100.95±0.189.01±1.0275.59±6.29
GNRs@SiO2-FA group101.51±0.448.39±0.4767.09±5.46
Iodine 125 seeds group104.29±0.86a3.81±1.28a46.84±7.90a
Combination group107.55±1.40a1.70±0.83a27.90±5.83a
F-value74.4984.60109.98
P-value0.000.000.00

Integral values are presented as a percentage (%).

P<0.05, compared with the control group and GNRs@SiO2-FA group; n, number of experiments performed.

Bcl-2 protein expression in HepG2 cells

In the 4 groups of HepG2 cells, the percentage of Bcl-2-positive cells was 9.01±1.02, 8.39±0.47, 3.81±1.28 and 1.70±0.83 in the control, GNRs@SiO2-FA, iodine 125 seed and the combination group, respectively. The protein expression level of Bcl-2 was much lower in the combination group than in the GNRs@SiO2-FA and iodine 125 seeds groups (P<0.05) (Fig. 8 and Table III).

Ki-67 protein expression in HepG2 cells

The cells in the control group were plump in shape. When the nuclei were hyper-chromatic, the results were positive. The protein expression level of Ki-67 was significantly decreased in the combination group compared with the GNRs@SiO2-FA and iodine 125 seeds groups (P<0.05), and the cell nuclei were stained lightly. In the 4 groups of cells, the Ki-67 proliferation index (KI) was 75.59±6.29, 67.09±5.46, 46.84±7.90 and 27.90±5.83% in the control, GNRs@SiO2-FA, iodine 125 seed and the combination group, respectively, which was significantly different between the 4 groups (P<0.05) (Fig. 8).

Discussion

In China, liver cancer is one of the malignant tumors with a high incidence, which has an insidious onset, rapid progression and alarmingly high mortality rates (14). The comprehensive treatment of hepatic cancer combining multiple methods, such as surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy may help in antagonizing the tumor (15). As normal hepatic tissues are poorly tolerant to radiation, it is not possible to increase the external irradiation dose used in the treatment of hepatic cancer; hence, the curative effect of external radiation therapy is poor. Compared with external radiation therapy, brachytherapy using iodine 125 seed implantation has the highest local dose and has a high dose close to the seed source and a steep fall in the dose for the surrounding tissues. After enough doses, it continues to kill the tumor cells; therefore, tumor tissue is damaged more thoroughly. However, the shortcoming of iodine 125 seed implant brachytherapy is that is is applied manually to existing cold and hot spots (3,16) idicated by radiotherapy sensitization methods to achieve absolutely conformal radiotherapy. This study investigated the GNRs@SiO2-FA containing the element Au, which has a high atomic number that enables it to infiltrate into cancer cells (17,18). High atomic number materials, such GNRs enter cancer cells, producing stronger photoelectric absorption effects on cancer cells than on the surrounding normal cells. GNRs@SiO2-FA, in combination with radiotherapy, acts as a radiosensitization agent, thereby enhancing the efficacy of radiotherapy. This type of combination therapy has a more prominent photoelectric absorption effect, accelerating the DNA chain rupture, and eventually leading to cell death (19,20). Cell apoptosis is known as programmed cell death (PCD), and multiple genes are involved in this process. A previous study demonstrated that the delivery of programmed cell death protein 4 (Pdcd4) in mice with liver cancer significantly suppressed tumor growth, induced apoptosis suppressed proliferation and angiogenesis (21). The coordinated action of apoptosis and anti-poptotic genes determines the initiation or inhibition of apoptosis (22). In this study, we selected Bcl-2, Bax, caspase-3 and Ki-67 as a testing index, observing the effects of GNRs@SiO2-FA in combination with radiotherapy on their expression. Mitochondria are central to apoptotic processes and can even decide cell fate. The mitochondrial membrane regulates the apoptosis of Bcl-2 family proteins, and the combination of the protein state will adjust the mitochondrial membrane potential, alter the expression of Cyt C (23) and Smac/DIABLO (24) proteins, as well as the release of AIF, activating the caspase pathway and lead to cell apoptosis; the mitochondria exerts this effect on promoting apoptosis through Bax/Bcl-2 and the regulation of caspases (25). Bcl-2 (26) is a type of mitochondrial transmembrane protein that can promote cell survival and inhibit apoptosis; it can prevent mitochondrial apoptosis before Cyt C blocks apoptosis, and members of the Bcl-2 family can be inserted in the mitochondrial outer membrane formation channels, thereby activating apoptosis. Ki-67 (27) is a type of cell cycle-related proliferating nuclear antigen that is used as an independent prognostic indicator for curing hepatic cancer and achieving total survival. A decrease in Ki-67 expression (28) has been shown to suppress cancer cell proliferation. Electron microscopy revealed that the GNRs were mostly in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2c) after entering the cells and are likely to be located in the mitochondria (Fig. 2d). The mitochondria may absorb GNRs and accept iodine 125 particle irradiation simultaneously, and mitochondrial damage leads to apoptosis. To the best of our knowledge, there have been limited studies published to date on the administration of GNRs in combination with iodine 125 particles. Our in vitro experiments confirmed that GNRs in combination with iodine 125 particles exerted marked synergistic anticancer effects. This study provides the experimental basis for hepatic cancer therapy using GNRs in combination with iodine 125 particles at the molecular level. However, a more detailed investigation is warranted in order to elucidate the specific biological mechanisms involved.
  26 in total

Review 1.  The pathophysiology of mitochondrial cell death.

Authors:  Douglas R Green; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Global cancer statistics, 2002.

Authors:  D Max Parkin; Freddie Bray; J Ferlay; Paola Pisani
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Suppression of tumor growth in H-ras12V liver cancer mice by delivery of programmed cell death protein 4 using galactosylated poly(ethylene glycol)-chitosan-graft-spermine.

Authors:  Ji-Hye Kim; Arash Minai-Tehrani; You-Kyoung Kim; Ji-Young Shin; Seong-Ho Hong; Hye-Joon Kim; Hee-Do Lee; Seung-Hee Chang; Kyeong-Nam Yu; Yong-Bin Bang; Chong-Su Cho; Tae-Jong Yoon; Dae-Yeul Yu; Hu-Lin Jiang; Myung-Haing Cho
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  7-Bromoindirubin-3'-oxime induces caspase-independent cell death.

Authors:  J Ribas; K Bettayeb; Y Ferandin; M Knockaert; X Garrofé-Ochoa; F Totzke; C Schächtele; J Mester; P Polychronopoulos; P Magiatis; A-L Skaltsounis; J Boix; L Meijer
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Noble metal nanoparticles applications in cancer.

Authors:  João Conde; Gonçalo Doria; Pedro Baptista
Journal:  J Drug Deliv       Date:  2011-10-05

6.  RGD-conjugated gold nanorods induce radiosensitization in melanoma cancer cells by downregulating α(v)β₃ expression.

Authors:  Wencai Xu; Teng Luo; Ping Li; Chuanqing Zhou; Daxiang Cui; Bo Pang; Qiushi Ren; Shen Fu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-02-27

7.  Interest of preoperative immunonutrition in liver resection for cancer: study protocol of the PROPILS trial, a multicenter randomized controlled phase IV trial.

Authors:  Oriana Ciacio; Thibault Voron; Gabriella Pittau; Maité Lewin; Eric Vibert; René Adam; Antonio Sa Cunha; Daniel Cherqui; Astrid Schielke; Olivier Soubrane; Olivier Scatton; Chady Salloum; Daniel Azoulay; Stéphane Benoist; Perrine Goyer; Jean-Christophe Vaillant; Laurent Hannoun; Emmanuel Boleslawski; Hélène Agostini; Didier Samuel; Denis Castaing
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate brachytherapy in treatment of prostate cancer - between options.

Authors:  Janusz Skowronek
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2013-03-29

9.  Functionalized gold nanorods for tumor imaging and targeted therapy.

Authors:  Chen Gui; Da-Xiang Cui
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.248

10.  The most effective gold nanorod size for plasmonic photothermal therapy: theory and in vitro experiments.

Authors:  Megan A Mackey; Moustafa R K Ali; Lauren A Austin; Rachel D Near; Mostafa A El-Sayed
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.991

View more
  9 in total

1.  Gold-coated iron oxide nanoparticles trigger apoptosis in the process of thermo-radiotherapy of U87-MG human glioma cells.

Authors:  Ali Neshastehriz; Zohreh Khosravi; Habib Ghaznavi; Ali Shakeri-Zadeh
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Anticancer Molecular Mechanism of Protocatechuic Acid Loaded on Folate Coated Functionalized Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite Delivery System in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Kalaivani Buskaran; Saifullah Bullo; Mohd Zobir Hussein; Mas Jaffri Masarudin; Mohamad Aris Mohd Moklas; Sharida Fakurazi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 3.  Preparation, toxicity reduction and radiation therapy application of gold nanorods.

Authors:  Lina Xie; Xujia Zhang; Chengchao Chu; Yingqi Dong; Tianzi Zhang; Xinyue Li; Gang Liu; Wen Cai; Suxia Han
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 10.435

4.  Development of a Novel Endovascular Brachytherapy Stent: A Proof-of-concept Study.

Authors:  Nan Du; Jingqin Ma; Zihan Zhang; Yongjie Zhou; Minjie Yang; Wen Zhang; Jianjun Luo; Zhiping Yan
Journal:  J Clin Transl Hepatol       Date:  2021-07-07

Review 5.  Surface modification of plasmonic noble metal-metal oxide core-shell nanoparticles.

Authors:  Somayeh Talebzadeh; Clémence Queffélec; D Andrew Knight
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2019-10-30

6.  Octahedral silver oxide nanoparticles enabling remarkable SERS activity for detecting circulating tumor cells.

Authors:  Meng He; Jie Lin; Ozioma Udochukwu Akakuru; Xiawei Xu; Yanying Li; Yi Cao; Yanping Xu; Aiguo Wu
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 6.038

7.  In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Folate-Silica-Gold Nanorods on Mouse Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Spermatogonial Cells.

Authors:  Neda Eslahi; Ali Shakeri-Zadeh; Khadijeh Ashtari; Vahid Pirhajati-Mahabadi; Tahereh Tohidi Moghadam; Ronak Shabani; Kamran Kamrava; Zahra Madjd; Chad Maki; Hamid Reza Asgari; Morteza Koruji
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2018-11-18       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 8.  Emerging and Innovative Theranostic Approaches for Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Status and Advances.

Authors:  Yaoye Tao; Jianguo Wang; Xiao Xu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-10

9.  Inhibition of livin overcomes radioresistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Fei Ma; Xia Gu; Jiang-Qi Liu; Li-Hua Mo; Gui Yang; Xiao-Rui Geng; Zhi-Qiang Liu; Zhi-Gang Liu; Ping-Chang Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.