Jennifer M Gamarra1,2,3, Matthew T Luciano1,4, Jaimie L Gradus1,2,5, Shannon Wiltsey Stirman1,2,6. 1. 1 National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA. 2. 2 Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. 3. 5 Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 4. 4 Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, TN, USA. 5. 3 Department of Psychiatry and Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 6. 6 National Center for PTSD, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2008, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented the use of safety planning for suicide prevention. A safety plan is a list of strategies, developed collaboratively with a provider, for a patient to use when suicide risk is elevated. Despite the use of safety plans in VHA, little is known about implementation fidelity, the extent to which safety plans are delivered as intended, or patient-level outcomes of safety planning. AIMS: This study aimed to explore the implementation fidelity of safety planning in a regional VHA hospital and examine the associations between safety plan quality and completeness with patient outcomes. METHOD: A comprehensive chart review was conducted for patients who were flagged as high risk for suicide (N = 200). Completeness and quality were coded, as well as information about patient and provider interactions regarding safety plan use. RESULTS: Safety plans were mostly complete and of moderate quality, although variability existed, particularly in quality. Limited evidence of follow-up regarding safety planning was found in the medical charts. Higher quality was associated with fewer subsequent psychiatric hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: Variability in implementation fidelity and infrequent follow-up suggest a need for additional training and support regarding the use of safety plans for suicide prevention.
BACKGROUND: In 2008, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented the use of safety planning for suicide prevention. A safety plan is a list of strategies, developed collaboratively with a provider, for a patient to use when suicide risk is elevated. Despite the use of safety plans in VHA, little is known about implementation fidelity, the extent to which safety plans are delivered as intended, or patient-level outcomes of safety planning. AIMS: This study aimed to explore the implementation fidelity of safety planning in a regional VHA hospital and examine the associations between safety plan quality and completeness with patient outcomes. METHOD: A comprehensive chart review was conducted for patients who were flagged as high risk for suicide (N = 200). Completeness and quality were coded, as well as information about patient and provider interactions regarding safety plan use. RESULTS: Safety plans were mostly complete and of moderate quality, although variability existed, particularly in quality. Limited evidence of follow-up regarding safety planning was found in the medical charts. Higher quality was associated with fewer subsequent psychiatric hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: Variability in implementation fidelity and infrequent follow-up suggest a need for additional training and support regarding the use of safety plans for suicide prevention.
Authors: Sonja K Schoenwald; Ann F Garland; Jason E Chapman; Stacy L Frazier; Ashli J Sheidow; Michael A Southam-Gerow Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2011-01
Authors: Enola K Proctor; John Landsverk; Gregory Aarons; David Chambers; Charles Glisson; Brian Mittman Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2008-12-23
Authors: John F McCarthy; Marcia Valenstein; H Myra Kim; Mark Ilgen; Kara Zivin; Frederic C Blow Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-02-27 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Elizabeth C Conti; Danielle R Jahn; Kelsey V Simons; Lenis P Chen Edinboro; M Lindsey Jacobs; Latrice Vinson; Sarah T Stahl; Kimberly A Van Orden Journal: Clin Gerontol Date: 2019-05-17 Impact factor: 2.619
Authors: Eric Zhou; Christopher R DeCou; Jennifer Stuber; Ali Rowhani-Rahbar; Kosuke Kume; Frederick P Rivara Journal: Arch Suicide Res Date: 2019-07-18
Authors: Julie E Richards; Elena Kuo; Christine Stewart; Jennifer F Bobb; Kayne D Mettert; Ali Rowhani-Rahbar; Marian E Betz; Rebecca Parrish; Ursula Whiteside; Jennifer M Boggs; Gregory E Simon Journal: JAMA Health Forum Date: 2021-08-06
Authors: Alexandra H Bettis; Kathleen R Donise; Heather A MacPherson; Pauline Bagatelas; Jennifer C Wolff Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2020-08-25 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Julie E Richards; Sarah D Hohl; Courtney D Segal; David C Grossman; Amy K Lee; Ursula Whiteside; Casey Luce; Evette J Ludman; Greg Simon; Robert B Penfold; Emily C Williams Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Doyanne Darnell; Patricia A Areán; Shannon Dorsey; David C Atkins; Michael J Tanana; Tad Hirsch; Sean D Mooney; Edwin D Boudreaux; Katherine Anne Comtois Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2021-12-15
Authors: Marianne Goodman; Gregory K Brown; Hanga C Galfalvy; Angela Page Spears; Sarah R Sullivan; Kalpana Nidhi Kapil-Pair; Shari Jager-Hyman; Lisa Dixon; Michael E Thase; Barbara Stanley Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2020-01-10
Authors: Emma H Moscardini; Ryan M Hill; Cody G Dodd; Calvin Do; Julie B Kaplow; Raymond P Tucker Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-04 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Molly Davis; Courtney Benjamin Wolk; Shari Jager-Hyman; Rinad S Beidas; Jami F Young; Jennifer A Mautone; Alison M Buttenheim; David S Mandell; Kevin G Volpp; Katherine Wislocki; Anne Futterer; Darby Marx; E L Dieckmeyer; Emily M Becker-Haimes Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2020-09-26