Literature DB >> 26647951

A comparison of neck bending and flexion measurement methods for assessment of ergonomic risk.

Mohsen Zare1, Sophie Biau2, Rene Brunet1, Antoine Gourlay1, Yves Roquelaure1,3.   

Abstract

Head movements of workers were measured in the sagittal plane in order to establish a precise and accurate assessment method to be used in real work situations. Measurements were performed using two inclinometers connected to an embedded recording system. Two quantitative analysis methods were tested, i.e., measurement of bending with an inclinometer attached to the head, and measurement of flexion/extension by using an additional inclinometer located at C7/T1. The results were also compared with a video observation method (qualitative). The results showed that bending measurements were significantly different from those of flexion/extension for angles between 0° and 20°, and angles >45°. There were also significant differences between workers for flexion >45°, reflecting individual variability. Additionally, several limitations of observational methods were revealed by this study.

Keywords:  bending; cervical spine; ergonomic; flexion; head

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26647951     DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1081772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Occup Saf Ergon        ISSN: 1080-3548


  1 in total

1.  Quantification of Exposure to Risk Postures in Truck Assembly Operators: Neck, Back, Arms and Wrists.

Authors:  Mohsen Zare; Julie Bodin; Jean-Claude Sagot; Yves Roquelaure
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.