Lena Sandin Wranker1, Mikael Rennemark2, Johan Berglund3. 1. Department of Health, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden Department of Health Sciences, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Lund University, Sweden lena.sandin-wranker@spray.se. 2. Department of Psychology, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden. 3. Department of Health, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pain is common in the elderly population and its prevalence varies according to the studied disease, clinical setting, sex and age. This study examines pain in an aging population from a gender perspective. METHODS: The Swedish National study on Aging and Care (SNAC) is conducted at four research centres. Participants were recruited from the baseline sample (n=1402) at one of the research centres, SNAC-Blekinge. Individuals aged 60 years and older were included and non-participation was documented. Research personnel conducted the medical examination on two occasions. RESULTS: The prevalence of pain was 769/1402 (54.8%), distributed as 496/817 (64.5%) women and 273/585 (35.5%) men,p<0.01. Women reported more pain located in the vertebral column,p<0.01. The most common pain location was the legs and feet. About 84% reported pain intensity as 4 or higher on the visual analogue scale (VAS). Pain intensity declines with age among men,p<0.01. The most frequent treatment was painkillers. A total of 128/263 (48.7%) of the men received no pain treatment compared with 177/478 (37.0%) of the women,p<0.01. In a multivariate logistic regression model, women yielded the highest OR [OR 1.94 (C.I. 1.51-2.49)] for pain. CONCLUSIONS: Pain is common among older adults and there are significant differences between the sexes. Almost 55% of participants reported pain, predominantly women. In the majority of cases the intensity was rated as moderate or severe (VAS >4) and women rated higher than men p<002. Almost half of the men (48.7%) did not receive any treatment compared to 37% of the women, p<001.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pain is common in the elderly population and its prevalence varies according to the studied disease, clinical setting, sex and age. This study examines pain in an aging population from a gender perspective. METHODS: The Swedish National study on Aging and Care (SNAC) is conducted at four research centres. Participants were recruited from the baseline sample (n=1402) at one of the research centres, SNAC-Blekinge. Individuals aged 60 years and older were included and non-participation was documented. Research personnel conducted the medical examination on two occasions. RESULTS: The prevalence of pain was 769/1402 (54.8%), distributed as 496/817 (64.5%) women and 273/585 (35.5%) men,p<0.01. Women reported more pain located in the vertebral column,p<0.01. The most common pain location was the legs and feet. About 84% reported pain intensity as 4 or higher on the visual analogue scale (VAS). Pain intensity declines with age among men,p<0.01. The most frequent treatment was painkillers. A total of 128/263 (48.7%) of the men received no pain treatment compared with 177/478 (37.0%) of the women,p<0.01. In a multivariate logistic regression model, women yielded the highest OR [OR 1.94 (C.I. 1.51-2.49)] for pain. CONCLUSIONS:Pain is common among older adults and there are significant differences between the sexes. Almost 55% of participants reported pain, predominantly women. In the majority of cases the intensity was rated as moderate or severe (VAS >4) and women rated higher than men p<002. Almost half of the men (48.7%) did not receive any treatment compared to 37% of the women, p<001.
Authors: A Hamina; A E Muller; T Clausen; S Skurtveit; M Hesse; C Tjagvad; B Thylstrup; I Odsbu; H Zoega; H L Jónsdóttir; H Taipale Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-05-16 Impact factor: 4.070
Authors: Janiece L Taylor; Brittany F Drazich; Laken Roberts; Safiyyah Okoye; Emerald Rivers; Jennifer Wenzel; Rebecca Wright; Mary Catherine Beach; Sarah L Szanton Journal: J Women Aging Date: 2020-05-31
Authors: Manu Thakral; Ling Shi; Janice B Foust; Kushang V Patel; Robert H Shmerling; Jonathan F Bean; Suzanne G Leveille Journal: Geriatr Nurs Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 2.361