Christie Yao1, Robert S Stawski2, David F Hultsch3, Stuart W S MacDonald3. 1. a Department of Psychology , York University , Toronto , ON , Canada. 2. b College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University , Corvallis , OR , USA. 3. c Department of Psychology , University of Victoria , Victoria , BC , Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Selection of a developmental time metric is useful for understanding causal processes that underlie aging-related cognitive change and for the identification of potential moderators of cognitive decline. Building on research suggesting that time to attrition is a metric sensitive to non-normative influences of aging (e.g., subclinical health conditions), we examined reason for attrition and intraindividual variability (IIV) in reaction time as predictors of cognitive performance. METHOD: Three hundred and four community dwelling older adults (64-92 years) completed annual assessments in a longitudinal study. IIV was calculated from baseline performance on reaction time tasks. Multilevel models were fit to examine patterns and predictors of cognitive change. RESULTS: We show that time to attrition was associated with cognitive decline. Greater IIV was associated with declines on executive functioning and episodic memory measures. Attrition due to personal health reasons was also associated with decreased executive functioning compared to that of individuals who remained in the study. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that time to attrition is a useful metric for representing cognitive change, and reason for attrition and IIV are predictive of non-normative influences that may underlie instances of cognitive loss in older adults.
OBJECTIVES: Selection of a developmental time metric is useful for understanding causal processes that underlie aging-related cognitive change and for the identification of potential moderators of cognitive decline. Building on research suggesting that time to attrition is a metric sensitive to non-normative influences of aging (e.g., subclinical health conditions), we examined reason for attrition and intraindividual variability (IIV) in reaction time as predictors of cognitive performance. METHOD: Three hundred and four community dwelling older adults (64-92 years) completed annual assessments in a longitudinal study. IIV was calculated from baseline performance on reaction time tasks. Multilevel models were fit to examine patterns and predictors of cognitive change. RESULTS: We show that time to attrition was associated with cognitive decline. Greater IIV was associated with declines on executive functioning and episodic memory measures. Attrition due to personal health reasons was also associated with decreased executive functioning compared to that of individuals who remained in the study. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that time to attrition is a useful metric for representing cognitive change, and reason for attrition and IIV are predictive of non-normative influences that may underlie instances of cognitive loss in older adults.
Authors: Esther Strauss; Allison A M Bielak; David Bunce; Michael A Hunter; David F Hultsch Journal: Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn Date: 2007-11
Authors: Stuart W S MacDonald; Sari Karlsson; Laura Fratiglioni; Lars Bäckman Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2011-03-25 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Elizabeth Munoz; Robert S Stawski; Martin J Sliwinski; Joshua M Smyth; Stuart W S MacDonald Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 4.077