Literature DB >> 26646847

Comparison of retrograde nailing and minimally invasive plating for treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures (OTA 33-A) above total knee arthroplasty.

Jin Park1,2, Ju Hong Lee3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Retrograde intramedullary (IM) nailing and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) using locking plate are typically considered the gold standards of treatment for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures above total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
METHODS: Forty-one consecutive patients treated with either retrograde nailing (nail group, n = 20) or minimally invasive plating (plate group, n = 21) for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures between March 2003 and January 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical functions [arc range of motion and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score] and bony outcomes (bony union and malunion) were evaluated.
RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the nail and plate groups in age (p = 0.665), one-year postoperative arc range of motion (p = 0.642), preoperative WOMAC score (p = 0.076), postoperative one-year WOMAC score (p = 0.135), and union time (p = 0.081). The mean union time of the nail group and the plate group was 4.3 months (range 3-12 months) and 3.6 months (range 3-5 months), respectively. There were three cases of malalignment in the nail group, whereas there was one case of malalignment in the plate group (p = 0.343). One case of nailing using a short nail demonstrated nail breakage.
CONCLUSIONS: Although retrograde nailing was found to have a slightly higher rate of malunion compared to minimally invasive plating, there was no statistically significant difference between both treatment options in terms of clinical outcomes. Regardless of which implant is used, the proper application is essential in management of periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures above TKA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nailing; Periprosthetic fracture; Plating; Supracondylar femur; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26646847     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2374-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  9 in total

1.  Surgical outcomes of simple distal femur fractures in elderly patients treated with the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis technique: can percutaneous cerclage wiring reduce the fracture healing time?

Authors:  Jae-Ho Lee; Ki-Chul Park; Seung-Jae Lim; Kyeu-Back Kwon; Ji Wan Kim
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Early complications and reoperation rates are similar amongst open reduction internal fixation, intramedullary nail, and distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Quinzi; Gabriel Ramirez; Nathan B Kaplan; Thomas G Myers; Caroline P Thirukumaran; Benjamin F Ricciardi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Retrograde intramedullary nailing of comminuted intra-articular distal femur fractures results in high union rate.

Authors:  Samantha Nino; Joshua A Parry; Frank R Avilucea; George J Haidukewych; Joshua R Langford
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-10-08

4.  Application of a double reverse traction repositor in the retrograde intramedullary nailing of distal femur fractures.

Authors:  Xiaodong Lian; Kuo Zhao; Wei Chen; Junzhe Zhang; Junyong Li; Hongyu Meng; Zhiyong Hou; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Locked compression plating versus retrograde intramedullary nailing in the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar knee fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Henry Magill; Nikhil Ponugoti; Amr Selim; James Platt
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 6.  Review of patient-reported outcomes in periprosthetic distal femur fractures after total knee arthroplasty: a plate or intramedullary nail?

Authors:  Dustin Rinehart; Tyler Youngman; Junho Ahn; Michael Huo
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-06-11

7.  Nail diameter significantly impacts stability in combined plate-nail constructs used for fixation of supracondylar distal femur fractures.

Authors:  David J Wright; Donald J DeSanto; Michelle H McGarry; Thay Q Lee; John A Scolaro
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2022-02-15

8.  Arthroscopic Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing of Periprosthetic Fractures After Total Knee Arthroplasty-Technique, Safety, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Ali Lari; Syed Kashif; Ali AlMukaimi
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-08-15

Review 9.  Femoral Periprosthetic Fractures after Total Knee Arthroplasty: New Surgically Oriented Classification with a Review of Current Treatments.

Authors:  Seung Joon Rhee; Jae Young Cho; Yoon Young Choi; Takeshi Sawaguchi; Jeung Tak Suh
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-12-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.