| Literature DB >> 26646789 |
Norbert Harrasser1, Sebastian Jüssen2, Ingo J Banke3, Ralf Kmeth4, Ruediger von Eisenhart-Rothe5, Bernd Stritzker6, Hans Gollwitzer7,8, Rainer Burgkart9.
Abstract
Silver ions (Ag(+)) have strong bactericidal effects and Ag-coated medical devices proved their effectiveness in reducing infections in revision total joint arthroplasty. We quantitatively determined the antimicrobial potency of different surface treatments on a titanium alloy (Ti), which had been conversed to diamond-like carbon (DLC-Ti) and doped with high (Ag:PVP = 1:2) and low (Ag:PVP = 1:10 and 1:20) concentrations of Ag (Ag-DLC-Ti) with a modified technique of ion implantation. Bacterial adhesion and planktonic growth of clinically relevant bacterial strains (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) on Ag-DLC-Ti were compared to untreated Ti by quantification of colony forming units on the adherent surface and in the growth medium as well as semiquantitatively by determining the grade of biofilm formation by scanning electron microscopy. (1) A significant (p < 0.05) antimicrobial effect could be found for all Ag-DLC-Ti samples (reduced growth by 5.6-2.5 logarithmic levels). (2) The antimicrobial effect was depending on the tested bacterial strain (most for P. aeruginosa, least for S. aureus). (3) Antimicrobial potency was positively correlated with Ag concentrations. (4) Biofilm formation was decreased by Ag-DLC-Ti surfaces. This study revealed potent antibacterial effects of Ag-DLC-Ti. This may serve as a promising novel approach to close the gap in antimicrobial protection of musculoskeletal implants.Entities:
Keywords: Antibacterial coating; Diamond-like carbon; Implant-associated infections; Silver; Titanium
Year: 2015 PMID: 26646789 PMCID: PMC4673079 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-015-0162-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Features of the different testing groups
| Testing group | Ag:PVP | Bacterial strain |
|---|---|---|
| Ag-concentration of Ag-DLC-Ti: High | 1:2 |
|
| Ag-concentration of Ag-DLC-Ti: Low | 1:10 |
|
| SEM-evaluation | 1:2 |
|
Fig. 1Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of silver nanoparticles of AG-DLC-Ti (note: major nanoparticles are marked with arrows)
Fig. 2Sample preparation; ion irradiation of samples with missing irradiation of the sample’s lower surfaces (a), placement of samples in well culture plates with paraffin wax (arrow) covering the sample’s lower surface (b)
Amount/concentration. changes (log-levels/%) and p values (<0.05: significant) of CFU of different bacterial strains on Ti samples with high and low concentrated Ag-DLC
| High concentrated Ag-DLC-Ti | Ti (untreated) | DLC-Ti | Ag-DLC-Ti (Ag:PVP 1:2) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| | |||
| CFU ± SD | 2.1 × 105 ± 7.6 × 104 | 3.3 × 105 ± 2.4 × 105 | 8.1 × 100 ± 1.9 × 101 |
| Changes compared to Ti (log-levels/%)a,b | +0.2/+57 % | −4.4/−99.9 % | |
| p values | 0.149 | <0.05 | |
| | |||
| CFU/ml ± SD | 4.5 × 105 ± 2.8 × 105 | 1.0 × 106 ± 4.0 × 105 | 3.4 × 102 ± 1.1 × 103 |
| Changes compared to Ti (log-levels/%)a,b | +0.3/+122.2 % | −2.8/−99.9 % | |
| p values | <0.05 | <0.05 | |
|
| |||
| | |||
| CFU ± SD | 7.3 × 106 ± 3.1 × 106 | 7.8 × 106 ± 2.4 × 106 | 1.7 × 104 ± 3.1 × 104 |
| Changes compared to Ti (log-levels/%)a,b | +0.03/+6.8 % | −2.6/−99.9 % | |
| p values | 0.428 | <0.05 | |
| | |||
| CFU/ml ± SD | 1.1 × 108 ± 4.1 × 107 | 8.4 × 107 ± 6.1 × 107 | 3.6 × 105 ± 5.4 × 105 |
| Changes compared to Ti (log-levels/%)a,b | −0.1/−23.6 % | −2.5/−95.9 % | |
| p values | 0.213 | <0.05 | |
|
| |||
| | |||
| CFU ± SD | 1.6 × 106 ± 7.7 × 105 | 1.3 × 106 ± 5.7 × 105 | 3.8 × 100 ± 1.5 × 101 |
| Changes compared to Ti (log-levels/%)a,b | −0.09/−18.6 % | −5.6/−99.9 % | |
| p values | 0.533 | <0.05 | |
| | |||
| CFU/ml ± SD | 2.4 × 108 ± 3.8 × 107 | 2.1 × 108 ± 2.7 × 107 | 7.4 × 102 ± 1.6 × 103 |
| Changes compared to Ti (log-levels/%)a,b | −0.06/−12.5 % | −5.5/−99.9 % | |
| p values | 0.161 | <0.05 | |
CFU colony forming units, SD standard deviation
alog-levels = bacterial counts calculated as shown in following equation: log-levels = log10(CFU of Ag-DLC-Ti) − log10(CFU of untreated Ti)
bPositive values (log-levels/%) express increased bacterial growth on DLC-Ti/Ag-DLC-Ti compared to untreated Ti, negative values express reduced bacterial growth on DLC-Ti/Ag-DLC-Ti compared to untreated Ti
Fig. 3Bacterial growth of tested strains on the sample surfaces (Ti, DLC-Ti, and high concentrated Ag-DLC-Ti); t = 0: before incubation; t = 24 h: after incubation
Fig. 4Bacterial growth of tested strains in the nutrient solution (Ti, DLC-Ti, and high concentrated Ag-DLC-Ti); t = 0: before incubation; t = 24 h: after incubation
Fig. 5Bacterial growth of S. aureus on the surface and in the nutrient solution (Ti, DLC-Ti, and low concentrated Ag-DLC-Ti); t = 0: before incubation; t = 24 h: after incubation
Fig. 6Biofilm formation on different Ti surfaces. Homogenous biofilm grade 5 after incubation with S. epidermidis on native Ti (a), reduced biofilm grade 3 on high concentrated Ag-DLC-Ti (b)