Literature DB >> 26646636

Evaluation of success of alveolar cleft bone graft performed at 5 years versus 10 years of age.

Caroline Dissaux1, Frédéric Bodin2, Bruno Grollemund2, Thomas Bridonneau2, Isabelle Kauffmann3, Jean-François Mattern4, Catherine Bruant-Rodier2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Although alveolar cleft bone grafting is the most widely accepted approach, controversies remain on the operative timing.
METHODS: A consecutive retrospective series of 28 patients who received alveolar bone grafting was examined and divided into 2 groups depending on the age at the time of bone graft. Group A (14 patients) was operated at a mean age of 5.2 years [range, 4-7] and Group B (14 patients) at a mean age of 10 years [range, 8.5-13]. All the children were assessed clinically and by Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) before bone grafting and 6 months post-operatively. Cleft and bone graft dimensions, volumes were assessed using Osirix v.3.9.2. Residual bone graft coefficient (Bone Graft Volume on 6-months Postoperative CBCT/Alveolar Cleft Volume) was calculated. Complications, tooth movement or dental agenesis were also reported.
RESULTS: The sample was uniform within both groups, considering cleft forms, pre-surgical fistula rate and cleft volume. Residual bone graft coefficient reached 63.3% in Group A and 46.2% in Group B (p = 0.012). Results of residual bone graft are also influenced by tooth eruption through the graft (p = 0.007 in Group A and p = 0.02 in Group B).
CONCLUSIONS: This 3D analysis highlighted higher success of alveolar bone grafts when children are operated earlier around 5 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study. Level III/retrospective comparative study.
Copyright © 2015 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alveolar bone grafting; Cleft lip and palate; Treatment outcome measures

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26646636     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  6 in total

Review 1.  Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement.

Authors:  Anne Caroline Oenning; Reinhilde Jacobs; Ruben Pauwels; Andreas Stratis; Mihaela Hedesiu; Benjamin Salmon
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-11-15

2.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of alveolar cleft bone graft on the maxillofacial biomechanical stabilities of unilateral complete cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Tao Tian; Han-Yao Huang; Wei Wang; Bing Shi; Qian Zheng; Cheng-Hao Li
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.903

3.  Management of rare diseases of the Head, Neck and Teeth: results of a French population-based prospective 8-year study.

Authors:  Lisa Friedlander; Rémy Choquet; Eva Galliani; Myriam de Chalendar; Claude Messiaen; Amélie Ruel; Marie-Paule Vazquez; Ariane Berdal; Corinne Alberti; Muriel De La Dure Molla
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 4.123

4.  Secondary bone grafting for alveolar clefts: surgical timing, graft materials, and evaluation methods.

Authors:  Junhyung Kim; Woonhyeok Jeong
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2022-04-20

5.  Ischial tuberosity: new donor site for bone grafts in animal cleft research.

Authors:  Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich; Kristian Kniha; Zuzanna Magnuska; Felix Gremse; Florian Peters; Gholamreza Danesh; Frank Hölzle; Ali Modabber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A novel method for alveolar bone grafting assessment in cleft lip and palate patients: cone-beam computed tomography evaluation.

Authors:  Marcin Stasiak; Anna Wojtaszek-Słomińska; Bogna Racka-Pilszak
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 3.573

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.